Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 22;68(4):1426–1434. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07740-0

Table 5.

Treatment outcomes and adverse events after propensity score matching

Sedation Nonsedation P value
Number of patients (N) 133 133
Successful endoscopic hemostasis 123 (92.5%) 123 (92.5%) 1.00
Mean procedure time (min) 17.6 ± 10.0 20.2 ± 10.2 0.04
Time to emergency endoscopy ≤ 3 h 88 (66.2%) 86 (64.7%) 0.90
Main modality of hemostasis
 Soft coagulation 63 (47.4%) 63 (47.4%) 1.00
 EVL 23 (17.3%) 14 (10.6%) 0.16
 Thrombin spraying 17 (12.8%) 14 (10.6%)
 Hemoclips 12 (9.0%) 16 (12.0%)
 APC 3 (2.3%) 4 (3.0%)
 HSE 1 (0.8%) 3 (2.2%)
 EMR 2 (1.5%) 0 (0%)
 EIS 2 (1.5%) 0 (0%)
Operator of hemostasis
 Trainees 77 (57.9%) 89 (66.9%) 0.16
 Specialists 56 (42.1%) 44 (33.1%)
Surgery performed 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1.00
IVR performed 3 (2.3%) 0 (0%) 0.25
Adverse events
 Hypotension 4 (3.0%) 7 (5.3%) 0.54
 Bradycardia 3 (2.3%) 3 (2.3%) 1.00
 Hypoxia 2 (1.5%) 4 (3.0%) 0.68
 Aspiration pneumonia 10 (7.5%) 7 (5.3%) 0.62
 Rebleeding 10 (7.5%) 10 (7.5%) 1.00
 30-Day mortality 12 (9.0%) 9 (6.8%) 0.65

EVL endoscopic variceal ligation, APC argon plasma coagulation, HSE hypertonic saline-epinephrine, EMR endoscopic mucosal resection, EIS endoscopic injection sclerotherapy, IVR interventional radiology

Results are presented as mean ± SD or number of patients