Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 22;9(4):e14630. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14630

Table 1.

Sensitivity and specificity of investigated oral fluid screening tests compared to laboratory reference tests of THC in blood or serum at positivity thresholds ranging from 0 to 5 ng/mL THC, as reported by 2 experimental studies of roadside tests for cannabis use.

Screening Test (positivity threshold, ng/mL THC) Study (sample) Laboratory Reference Test (n tests; n reference test positives) Sensitivity and specificity (% [95% CI]) at varying positivity thresholds (ng/mL THC)
0–0.5
1.0
2.0
5.0
SENS SPEC SENS SPEC SENS SPEC SENS SPEC
Alere DDS
 Alere DDS 2 Mobile Test System (25) Newmeyer 2017 (adult occasional and frequent cannabis users) LC-MS/MS in blood (134; 1.0: 78, 2.0: 41, 5.0: 21) - 43.6 (33.1–54.6) 82.1 (70.2–90.0) 65.9 (50.6–78.4) 81.7 (72.7–88.3) 85.7 (65.4–95.0) 77.0 (68.4–83.8)
Draeger DrugTest
 DrugTest 5000 (5) Newmeyer 2017 (adult occasional and frequent cannabis users) LC-MS/MS in blood (103; 1.0: 72, 2.0: 53, 5.0: 19) 34.7 (24.8–46.2) 87.1 (71.2–94.9) 43.4 (31.0–56.7) 88.0 (76.2–94.4) 73.7 (51.2–88.2) 82.1 (72.6–88.9)
Securetec DrugWipe
 DrugWipe 5S (15) Wille 2015 (adult regular cannabis users) GC-MS in serum (72; 1.0: 42, 5.0: 26) 50.0 (35.5–64.5) 90.0 (74.4–96.5) 80.8 (62.1–91.5) 93.5 (82.5–97.8)

CI = confidence interval; DDS = Drug Detection System; GC-MS = gas chromatography mass spectrometry; LC-MS/MS = liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry; THC = delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol.

Comparative studies are demarcated in bold.