Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 29;9(4):e14982. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14982

Table 1.

Parameter settings of the model.

Subjects Parameter Description
Local government RG The government's profits when choosing the strategy of “active supervision"
k The ratio of the profit the government receives when it opts for the “passive supervision” strategy to the profit received when it opts for the “active supervision” strategy.
CG The cost for the local government when choosing an “active supervision” strategy.
CGA The financial subsidy given by the government when leading enterprises to choose the strategy of “positive participation”.
CGB The financial subsidy given by the government when leading enterprises to choose the strategy of “negative participation".
T The punishment imposed by the government on enterprises when the latter choose the strategy of “negative participation".
Leading enterprises RA Initial return of leading enterprises.
CA The cost when only leading enterprises choose the “active participation” strategy.
cA The cost for leading enterprises when both types of enterprises choose the strategy of “active participation".
RA1 The innovation benefit brought by leading enterprises when they improve their innovation capability.
RA2 The excess profit brought by leading enterprises when they improve the level of organization construction.
Following enterprises RB Initial return of following enterprises.
CB The cost when only following enterprises choose the “active participation” strategy.
cB The cost for following enterprises when both types of enterprises choose the strategy of “active participation".
RB1 The innovation benefit brought by following enterprises when they improve their innovation capability.
RB2 The excess profit brought by following enterprises when they improve the level of organization construction.
Variables Description
α Innovation capability coefficient
β Organization construction coefficient
γ Industry resources coefficient
x The probability of local government choosing the “active supervision” strategy
y The probability of leading enterprises choosing the “positive participation " strategy
z The probability of following enterprises choosing the “positive participation " strategy