Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 2;18(2):193–203. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09480822

Table 3.

Use of lasso logistic regression to select variables best at predicting the outcome of moderate-to-severe pruritus among 1668 Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort Study participants

Selected Predictors (Listed in Descending Order of Coefficient Magnitude) Method of Lasso Lambda (λ) Selectiona
Cross-Validation Minimize BIC Adaptive
Change in eGFR, absolute value
10% decrease in weight from baseline
Sex
10% increase in weight from baseline
Body mass index at baseline
BDI score ≥11
Baseline eGFR
Serum phosphate at baseline
New lung disease
New congestive heart failure
New peripheral vascular disease
New prescription opioid use
New hypertension
Prescription opioid use at baseline
Diabetes at baseline
Peripheral vascular disease at baseline
CRP at baseline
PTH at baseline
New diabetes
Urine protein
Race/ethnicity
New coronary artery disease

Variables are listed in order of the absolute values of their coefficients, with largest values first. All variables were standardized to facilitate comparisons of relative size of regression coefficients. Variables selected repeatedly by lasso regression models using different lambda tuning parameters demonstrate a more robust association with the outcome. In addition to comorbidities at baseline and baseline laboratory parameters, variables were created to represent a new diagnosis of diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, or new use of opioid medications during follow-up. A 10% increase or decrease in weight refers to the percent change in weight as compared with the weight at the baseline visit. The absolute change in eGFR was calculated by subtracting the eGFR at the time of the outcome or censoring event from the baseline value. Because we wanted to create variables to capture change in eGFR during follow-up, this analysis was restricted to the 1668 participants with at least two measurements of eGFR. BDI, Beck's Depression Inventory; CRP, C-reactive protein; PTH, parathyroid hormone.

a

Cross-validation chooses lambda on the basis of the model that minimizes the 10-fold cross-validation function. Minimize BIC refers to the lambda that results in the model with the smallest value for the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Adaptive lasso also uses cross-validation but uses a different penalization criterion in which coefficients receive different data-driven weights.