Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 14;20:68. doi: 10.1186/s12985-023-02033-y

Table 2.

The correspondence among results by three genotyping methods

S M L
Yun et al. (A–F) Liu et al. (A–E) Lv et al. (C–J) Yun et al. (A–F) Liu et al. (A–E) Lv et al. (C–J) Yun et al. (A–F) Liu et al. (A–E) Lv et al. (C–J)
A (48) B (48) C4 (48) A (46) B (46) C4 (47) A (46) B (46) C4 (46)
B-1 (32) E (32) J2 (32) B-1 (22) E (22) J2 (22) B-1 (22) E (22) J2 (22)
B-2 (90) E (90) J1 (90) B-2 (92) E (92) J1 (92) B-2 (86) E (86) J1 (86)
B-3 (47) E (47) J3 (38)/J4 (9) B-3 (55) E (55) J3 (55) B-3 (55) E (55) J3 (35)
C (2) B (2) C4 (2) C (1) B (1) C5 (1) C (3) B (3) C5 (3)
D (32) D (32) C3 (32) D (27) D (27) C3 (26) C5 (1) D (32) D (32) C3 (32)
E (2) C (2) C1 (2) E (2) C (2) C1 (2) E (2) C (2) C1 (2)
F (81) A (81) C2 (81) F (87) A (87) C2 (87) F (82) A (82) C2 (82)
Unassigned (1) E (1) * Unassigned (7) E (2) C6(5)

The data in parentheses are cited from Yun et al. [10]. These numbers denote the number of cases in every genotype.* means that there is no correspondence