Lim‐Ashworth 2013.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Design: parallel trial Comparison: omega‐3 PUFA vs placebo vs omega‐3 PUFA plus social skills vs placebo plus social skills |
|
Participants |
Inclusion criteria: 1. children and adolescents aged 9 to 16 years; 2. who had been diagnosed with ADHD Exclusion criteria: not stated Number of participants: 39 Mean age: not stated Gender: not stated ADHD subtypes: not stated Using ADHD drugs at baseline: not stated Baseline scores: not stated Setting: Singapore, year/s not stated Funding: not stated |
|
Interventions |
Intervention
Control
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | Outcome data were not reported. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: not described |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: not described |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: not described |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: not described; loss to follow‐up: not stated (39 enroled) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: Outcome data were not reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Comment: inadequate information |