Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Apr 22;45(7):958–969. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03139-6

Table 1.

Propensity-score matched pairs of patients treated using resin versus glass 90Y microspheres.

Characteristic Resin
(57 patients)
Glass
(57 patients)
p
Age 61 ± 12 61 ± 12 0.88
Female 36 (63%) 39 (68%) 0.69
Pathology 0.99
 HCC 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
 Cholangiocarcinoma 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
 Colorectal 22 (39%) 23 (40%)
 NET, grade 1 1 (2%) 2 (4%)
 NET, grade 2 3 (5%) 3 (5%)
 NET, grade 3 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
 Breast 14 (25%) 16 (28%)
 Sarcoma 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
 Other 11 (19%) 9 (16%)
Liver function
 Child-Pugh score 0.24
  A5 41 (72%) 43 (75%)
  A6 15 (26%) 10 (18%)
  B7 1 (2%) 4 (7%)
 Albumin 3.88 ± 0.45 3.79 ± 0.42 0.29
 Bilirubin 0.71 ± 0.50 0.64 ± 0.29 0.40
Tumor burden
 % tumor volume in treated liver 22% ± 26% 18% ± 16% 0.36
 Extrahepatic disease 39 (68%) 38 (67%) 1.0
 CEA (for colorectal) 520 ± 1100 870 ± 2400 0.53
Prior chemotherapy 48 (84%) 47 (82%) 1.0
Lung shunt fraction 5.1% ± 3.7% 4.8% ± 3.3% 0.68
Treatment volume (cm3) 1200 ± 600 1100 ± 500 0.17
T:N ratio (MAA scan) 3.0 ± 3.2 3.6 ± 3.7 0.31