Table I:
Comparison of fracture distribution in patients with high energy and low energy injury. Five patients in group-H and two patients in group-L had fracture at two sites
| Fracture Zone | Group-H | Group-L | P-Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | ||
| Pertrochantric | 13 | 24.1 | 29 | 23 | 0.85 |
| Distal radius | 7 | 13 | 44 | 34.9 | 0.0035 |
| Proximal humerus | 6 | 11.1 | 10 | 7.9 | 0.57 |
| Vertebral body | 5 | 9.3 | 9 | 7.1 | 0.76 |
| Proximal tibia | 4 | 7.4 | 1 | 0.8 | 0.03 |
| Metatarsal | 3 | 5.6 | 5 | 4 | 0.7 |
| Both bone leg | 3 | 5.6 | 1 | 0.8 | 0.08 |
| Neck of femur | 2 | 3.7 | 8 | 6.3 | 0.73 |
| Shaft of femur | 2 | 3.7 | 3 | 2.4 | 0.64 |
| Metacarpal | 2 | 3.7 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Distal tibia | 2 | 3.7 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Malleolar | 1 | 1.9 | 3 | 2.4 | 1.00 |
| Distal ulna | 1 | 1.9 | 1 | 0.8 | 0.51 |
| Distal femur | 1 | 1.9 | 1 | 0.8 | 0.51 |
| Forearm | 1 | 1.9 | 1 | 0.8 | 0.51 |
| Distal phalanx | 1 | 1.9 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Acetabulum | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2.4 | - |
| Metacarpal | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1.6 | - |
| Clavivle | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1.6 | - |
| Intercondylar humerus | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.8 | - |
| Patella | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.8 | - |
| Humerus shaft | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.8 | - |