Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2024 Feb 5:2023.03.27.534286. [Version 4] doi: 10.1101/2023.03.27.534286

Table 1: Performance metrics for napari-MM3.

Processing times were measured on an iMac with a 3.6 GHz 10-Core Intel Core i9 processor with 64 GB of RAM and an AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT 8 GB GPU. Tensorflow was configured to use the AMD GPU according to [40]. The GPU was used in U-Net training and segmentation steps. The dataset analyzed is from [10] and consists of 26 GB of raw image data (12 hours, 262 time frames, 2 imaging planes, 34 FOVs, and ~35 growth channels per FOV). Note that while the Otsu segmentation method is slightly faster than the U-Net, it also requires a background subtraction step, such that the total runtimes of the two methods are comparable.

Channel detection Background subtraction Segmentation (Otsu) Segmentation (U-Net) Tracking Total (Otsu) Total (U-Net)
Frame processing time N/A 2 ms 4 ms 5.3 ms N/A N/A N/A
Channel stack processing time (262 time frames) N/A 0.54 sec 1.14 sec 1.4 sec 0.7 sec 3.1 sec 2.1 sec
FOV processing time (35 channels) 14.1 sec 17.5 sec 36.5 sec 46 sec 46.7 sec 2 min 1.7 min
Exp. processing time (26 GB, 34 FOVs, ~20,000 cells) 3.2 min 9.9 min 20.6 min 26 min 26.4 min 60 min 55 min