Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 2;2(1):zpab011. doi: 10.1093/sleepadvances/zpab011

Table 4.

Analysis of LEM change from baseline in average SOL by M-MSLT (full analysis set)

Placebo (n = 68) LEM5 (n = 69) LEM10 (n = 68)
Treatment difference in change from baseline in average SOL, min
LSM change from baseline (SE) –3.44 (0.56) –4.58 (0.56) –6.92 (0.56)
LSM difference vs. placebo (lower bound of 95% CI) –1.15 (–2.12) –3.48 (–4.46)
1-sided p-valuea 0.0262 <0.0001

ap-Value vs. placebo using a mixed effects model, including treatment, period, and sequence as fixed effects, baseline (pre-dose) measurement as a covariate where applicable, and subject nested within-treatment sequence as a random effect.

If the lower bound of the one-sided 95% CI was –6.0 min or more, the dose was considered to have a clinically meaningful effect.

CI, confidence interval; LEM5, lemborexant 5 mg; LEM10, lemborexant 10 mg; LSM, least squares mean; M-MSLT, Modified Multiple Sleep Latency Test; SE, standard error; SOL, sleep onset latency.