Table 3.
Echocardiogram performed in the visit: basic analysis
| Echocardiogram: basic analysis | Patients (N = 31) | Controls (N = 31) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| LV and LA basic measurements | |||
| LVED diameter (MM), mean(SD) | 45.8(4.8) | 45.2(4.7) | p = 0.471 |
| LVES diameter (MM), mean(SD) | 29.9 (4.2) | 29.1(4.1) | p = 0.378 |
| IVS diameter (MM), mean(SD) | 9.4(1.3) | 8.7(1.8) | p = 0.097 |
| LV posterior wall diameter (mm), mean(SD) | 8.3(1.2) | 8.2(1.4) | p = 0.696 |
| LVED volume (ml/m2), median(IQR) | 43.8(15.5) | 40.8(11.0) | p = 0.905 |
| LVES volume (ml/m2), mean(SD) | 17.3(5.7) | 15.9(4.3) | p = 0.310 |
| LV stroke volume (ml/m2), median(IQR) | 28.0(13.6) | 27.0(8.8) | p = 0.387 |
| LV ejection fraction (%), mean(SD) | 62.0(7.0) | 64.1(6.0) | p = 0.154 |
| TAPSE (mm), mean(SD) | 24.2(2.8) | 24.8(2.8) | p = 0.408 |
| LA diameter (mm), mean(SD) | 35.5(4.8) | 34.2(5.2) | p = 0.313 |
| LA area (cm2), mean(SD) | 19.0(4.3) | 18.0(3.9) | p = 0.230 |
| LA volume (ml/m2), mean(SD) | 28.8(7.9) | 27.5(7.6) | p = 0.45 |
| LA appendage | |||
| LAA ostium maximum (mm), mean(SD) | 15.3(3.6) | 16.2(2.9) | p = 0.279 |
| LAA ostium minimum (mm), mean(SD) | 8.6(3.2) | 7.6(1.9) | p = 0.158 |
| LAA ostium variation (mm), median(IQR) | 6.5(2.9) | 8.7(2.3) | p < 0.001 |
| LAA ostium relative variation (%), mean(SD) | 45.1(12.0) | 53.0(7.7) | p = 0.002 |
| Diastolic function | |||
| E/E′, mean(SD) | 7.8(3.3) | 7.5(2.4) | p = 0.549 |
| E′ septal (m/s), mean(SD) | 0.08(0.04) | 0.09(0.03) | p = 0.169 |
| E′ lateral (m/s), mean(SD) | 0.12(0.04) | 0.11(0.03) | p = 0.779 |
| Tricuspid regurgitation (m/s), mean(SD) | 2.2(0.9) | 2.0(0.6) | p = 0.200 |
| Diastolic dysfunction, N(%) | 0.0(0.0) | 0.0(0.0) | – |
Statistically significant results are shown in bold
IQR Interquartile range, IVS interventricular septum, LA left atrium, LAA Left atrium appendage, LV left ventricle, LVED left ventricle end-diastole, LVES left ventricle end-systole, SD standard deviation, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion