Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 6;4(1):163–173. doi: 10.1007/s42761-022-00140-7

Table 2.

Intervention effects on depressive mood, positive emotion, negative emotion, and emotion flexibility

Baseline
(n=602)
mean (SD)
Post
(n=353)
mean (SD)
Follow-up 1
(n=320)
mean (SD)
Follow-up 2
(n=328)
mean (SD)
Overall effect
(intervention × time)
Depressive mood Past week (assessment) Intervention 32.544 (0.57) 23.598 (0.62) 19.826 (0.68) 21.227 (0.78)

βtime=−10.211*

βtime×time=1.879*

Control 32.191 (1.61) 27.819 (1.75)* 24.862 (1.91)* 23.321 (2.22)
Positive emotion Past week (assessment) Intervention 3.994 (0.06) 4.332 (0.06) 4.669 (0.08) 5.007 (0.10) βtime=0.058
Control 3.620 (0.18) 3.900 (0.18)* 4.180 (0.22)* 4.460(0.28)
Past day (daily diary) Intervention 3.902 (0.06) 4.112 (0.07) 4.322 (0.08) 4.531 (0.10) βtime=0.056
Control 3.469 (0.18)* 3.622 (0.19)* 3.776 (0.22)* 3.929 (0.27)*
Reactivity to stress (daily diary) Intervention 0.007 (0.01) 0.009 (0.01) 0.011 (0.02) 0.013 (0.02) βtime=0.0005
Control −0.071 (0.04) −0.070 (0.04) −0.069 (0.04) −0.067 (0.05)
Negative emotion Past week (assessment) Intervention 4.726 (0.07) 3.467 (0.08) 2.990 (0.08) 3.293 (0.10)

βtime=−1.115*

βtime×time=0.201*

Control 4.881 (0.20) 4.133 (0.2)* 3.766 (0.24)* 3.776 (0.28)
Past day (daily diary) Intervention 3.545 (0.07) 3.007(0.07) 2.802 (0.08) 2.933 (0.09)

βtime=−0.949*

βtime×time=0.162*

Control 3.493 (0.20) 3.418 (0.21) 3.353 (0.21)* 3.298 (0.25)
Reactivity to stress (daily diary) Intervention 0.002 (0.02) −0.0002 (0.01) −0.001 (0.04) −0.005 (0.02) βtime=−0.038*
Control −0.0003 (0.04) 0.035 (0.04) 0.070 (0.04) 0.105 (0.05)*
Emotional flexibility Association of positive and negative emotion on stress vs. non-stress days (daily diary) Intervention 0.113 (0.02) 0.112 (0.01) 0.110 (0.02) 0.110 (0.02) βtime=0.039
Control 0.154 (0.05) 0.114 (0.04) 0.074 (0.05) 0.033 (0.07)

Note: Age was significant in models of: negative reactivity, negative emotion at daily burst, negative emotion at assessment level, and emotion flexibility but estimates were robust to the inclusion of the age covariate. *p < .05 for within-time point comparison