Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 13;21:28–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2022.12.002

Table 3.

Risk of bias assessment for publications eligible for evaluation of the ERP (n = 21).

Anthelmintic(s) Study design Selection bias Performance bias Detection bias Attrition bias Reporting bias Risk of bias judgement Reference
IVM Comparative N/A N/A No information Low Low Low Borgsteede et al. (1993)
IVM Comparative N/A N/A No information Low Some concerns Some concerns von Samson-Himmelstjerna et al. (2007)
IVM Comparative N/A N/A No information Low Low Low McFarlane et al. (2010)
IVM Randomised controlled Low No information No information Low Low Low Larsen et al. (2011)
IVM Comparative N/A N/A No information Low High High Zak et al. (2017)
IVM Comparative N/A N/A No information High Some concerns High Rosanowski et al. (2017)
IVM Comparative N/A N/A No information Low Low Low Molena et al. (2018)
IVM Comparative Some concerns Low No information High No information High Butler et al. (2021)
IVM, MOX Comparative Some concerns No information No information Low Low Some concerns Johnson and Biddle (2021)
MOX Comparative Low Some concerns No information Low Some concerns Some concerns Abbas et al. (2021)
IVM, MOX Randomised controlled No information No information No information Low Some concerns Some concerns (van Doorn et al., 2014)
IVM, MOX Retrospective N/A Some concerns No information No information Low Some concerns Daniels and Proudman (2016)
IVM, MOX, ABM Comparative No information No information No information Low Low Low Beasley et al. (2017)
IVM, MOX, PYR, FBZ Comparative No information No information No information Low Some concerns Some concerns Relf et al. (2014)
IVM, MOX Randomised comparative Low No information Low Low Low Low Geurden et al. (2014)
IVM, MOX, PYR, FBZ Comparative Low No information Low Low Low Low Sanna et al. (2016)
IVM, MOX Comparative Low No information No information Low Low Low Kooyman et al. (2016)
MOX Comparative N/A N/A No information Low Low Low Tzelos et al. (2017)
MOX, ABM Randomised controlled Low No information No information Some concerns Low Some concerns Holm-Martin et al. (2005)
MOX, FBZ Observational field N/A High High Low Some concerns High Rossano et al. (2010)
PYR Comparative N/A N/A No information Low No information Low Boersema et al. (1995)

Abbreviations: ERP, egg reappearance period; N/A, not applicable; ALB, albendazole; ABM, abamectin; FBZ, fenbendazole; IVM, ivermectin; MOX, moxidectin; PYR, pyrantel.