Skip to main content
. 2014 May 7;2014(5):CD005062. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005062.pub4

Shi 2001.

Methods Randomised controlled trial, parallel groups
Participants Setting: hospital inpatients and outpatients
Treatment group (males): 45 (20)
 Control group (males): 35 (16)
 Age: Treatment group: mean 9 (range 5 to 14) years; Control group: mean 10 (range 6 to 13) years
 Inclusion: childhood absence epilepsy
 Exclusion: none
 Seizure type: childhood absence epilepsy
 Duration of epilepsy: Treatment group: 10 months to 4 years; Control group: 6 months to 5 years
Aetiology of epilepsy: not available
 Baseline seizure frequency: not available
 Number of AEDs taken: not available
Interventions Treament group: acupuncture at 6 acupoints (including injection of diazepam to 2 acupoints) alternate day
 Control group: Na valproate 200 mg tds + piracetam 800 mg tds
 Duration of treatment: 80 days
Outcomes Seizure freedom
 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency
Notes Duration of follow‐up: 1 year
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Random sequence generation was not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation concealment was not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk The participants and personnel and outcome assessors were not blinded
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk The participants and personnel and outcome assessors were not blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk The outcome assessors were not blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk There were no dropouts
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes were reported
Other bias High risk Comparability of groups at baseline was uncertain since there were no data on aetiology of epilepsy, current AED treatments, and frequency of seizures at baseline. There was no sham or placebo control and hence there might be placebo effect which causes bias