Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 10;29(5):508–520. doi: 10.1002/lt.26574

TABLE 4. Outcome.

n 14
Utilization rate Discarded 4 (29)
Transplanted 10 (71)
Outcome Discarded 4 (29)
EAF 2 (14)
Functioning 8 (57)
Outcomes in patients who received transplants
n 10
 AST peak, IU/L 2292 (983, 6330)
 ALT peak, IU/L 697 (402, 1831)
 EAD 5 (50)
 L‐GrAFT scorea −1.9 (−2.4, −1.0)
 L‐GrAFT score, risk %a 13.6 (8.5, 26.7)
 EASE scorea −3.7 (−4.0, −2.8)
 EASE score, risk %a 2.6 (2.0, 6.0)
 AKI stage 0 4 (40)
1 2 (20)
2 1 (10)
3 3 (30)
 Dialysis after LT 2 (20)
 Clavien‐Dindo classification ≥3b 4 (40)
 CCI at discharge 35.5 (29.9, 38.8)
 ICU stay, days 5.0 (2.2, 10.8)
 Hospital stay, days 16.5 (13.2, 24.2)

Note: Data are presented as counts (percentage) or median (IQR).

Abbreviations: AKI, acute kidney injury; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CCI, Comprehensive Complication Index; EAD, early allograft dysfunction; EAF, early allograft failure; EASE, Early Allograft Failure Simplified Estimation; ICU, intensive care unit; IQR, interquartile range; L‐GrAFT, Liver Graft Assessment Following Transplantation; LT, liver transplantation.

a

L‐GrAFT and EASE scores could be calculated only in patients not suffering from EAF.