Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 23;53(5):1759–1769. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721003378

Table 3.

Predictive value of PRS-Sz and cannabis use on CAPE-42 subscales

Independent variable β Std. error p R2
IMAGEN
Depressive sub-scale 0.065
PRS-Sz 0.018 0.007 1.12 × 10−2
Cannabis use 0.010 0.004 2.47 × 10−2
Negative sub-scale 0.020
PRS-Sz 0.014 0.007 5.28 × 10−2
Cannabis use 0.013 0.005 3.84 × 10−3
Positive sub-scale 0.021
PRS-Sz 0.011 0.005 2.76 × 10−2
Cannabis use 0.004 0.003 1.68 × 10−1
Utrecht
Depressive sub-scale 0.065
PRS-Sz 0.022 0.007 1.10 × 10−3
Cannabis use 0.010 0.004 7.17 × 10−3
Negative sub-scale 0.033
PRS-Sz 0.023 0.007 1.85 × 10−3
Cannabis use 0.019 0.004 7.17 × 10−6
Positive sub-scale 0.039
PRS-Sz 0.011 0.006 5.88 × 10−2
Cannabis use 0.017 0.003 9.24 × 10−8

β, main effect size; std. error, standard error. Bold values indicate p < 0.05.

This table shows results of the effects of the independent variables in linear regression models on the various sub-scales of the CAPE-42. Dependent variable is log-transformed CAPE-42 scores for each subscale. We considered the first six PC and sex as covariates for all analyses and age is included for all analyses of the Utrecht cannabis cohort.