Table 5.
The level of importance (LI), numerical values (NV), group weights (GW), and group importance (GI) of all criteria in decision makers' viewpoint.
| ES-based Criteria | Experts |
GI | GW | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Expert |
Second Expert |
Third expert |
Forth expert |
|||||||
| LI | NV | LI | NV | LI | NV | LI | NV | |||
| NCULR | ||||||||||
| Reliability | Highb | 0.8 | a | 1.0 | b | 0.8 | c | 0.5 | 0.78 | 0.22 |
| Traditional Resilience | b | 0.8 | b | 0.8 | b | 0.8 | c | 0.5 | 0.74 | 0.22 |
| Vulnerability | b | 0.8 | a | 1.0 | b | 0.8 | c | 0.5 | 0.78 | 0.21 |
| NPP | Lowd | 0.2 | b | 0.8 | c | 0.5 | c | 0.5 | 0.44 | 0.04 |
| APES* | b | 0.8 | d | 0.2 | d | 0.2 | d | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.08 |
| EI⁎⁎ | Very higha | 1.0 | a | 1.0 | b | 0.8 | a | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.18 |
| AP⁎⁎⁎ | Averagec | 0.5 | c | 0.5 | c | 0.5 | c | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.04 |
| IRWC | ||||||||||
| Reliability | a | 1.0 | a | 1.0 | a | 1.0 | a | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.16 |
| Traditional Resilience | a | 1.0 | a | 1.0 | a | 1.0 | a | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.16 |
| Vulnerability | a | 1.0 | a | 1.0 | a | 1.0 | b | 0.8 | 0.96 | 0.16 |
| NPP | d | 0.2 | d | 0.2 | d | 0.2 | Very lowe | 0.0 | 0.16 | 0.09 |
| PESA | c | 0.5 | d | 0.2 | d | 0.2 | c | 0.5 | 0.38 | 0.11 |
| EC | b | 0.8 | b | 0.8 | b | 0.8 | b | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.21 |
| AP | d | 0.2 | d | 0.2 | d | 0.2 | d | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.11 |
| IMAJ | ||||||||||
| Reliability | a | 1.0 | c | 0.5 | c | 0.5 | b | 0.8 | 0.82 | 0.15 |
| Traditional Resilience | a | 1.0 | c | 0.5 | c | 0.5 | b | 0.8 | 0.76 | 0.14 |
| Vulnerability | a | 1.0 | c | 0.5 | c | 0.5 | b | 0.8 | 0.76 | 0.14 |
| NPP | c | 0.5 | b | 0.8 | a | 1.0 | b | 0.8 | 0.72 | 0.13 |
| PESA | a | 1.0 | a | 1.0 | a | 1.0 | a | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.18 |
| EC | c | 0.5 | c | 0.5 | c | 0.5 | c | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.09 |
| AP | a | 1.0 | a | 1.0 | a | 1.0 | a | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.18 |
a) Very high; b) High; c) Average; d) Low; e) Very low.
⁎
APES= Agricultural Provisioning Ecosystem Services.
⁎⁎
EI= Ecological Index.
⁎⁎⁎
AP= Agricultural productivity.