Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cornea. 2022 Oct 17;42(11):1408–1413. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003159

Table 3.

Results of linear mixed effects models estimating the effect of clinician characteristics and microbial keratitis (MK) scenarios on the reported risk threshold to always or never treat with targeted medication.

“Never” Treat “Always” Treat
Term Contrast Effect 95% CI Holm-adjusted P-value Effect 95% CI Holm-adjusted P-value
Experience (Years) - 0.1 −0.01, 0.3 0.072 −0.2 −0.7, 0.3 0.46
Gender Male vs Female −0.6 −4.0, 2.9 0.754 −7.1 −18.5, 4.3 0.216
MK Size & Location <2mm2 Central vs >8mm2 Central 1.2 0.2, 2.6 0.043 6.8 4.5, 9.2 <0.001
<2mm2 Peripheral vs >8mm2 Central 2.9 1.4, 4.3 <0.001 12.1 9.7, 14.4 <0.001
<2mm2 Peripheral vs <2mm2 Central 1.6 0.2, 3.1 0.012 5.2 2.8, 7.6 <0.001
MK Type x Practice Location Comparison between MK Type in US
 F vs B 8.4 2.1, 14.7 0.001 26.2 10.9, 41.5 <0.001
 H vs B 5.4 −0.3, 11.1 0.078 9.3 −1.1, 19.7 0.097
 H vs F −3.0 −8.4, 2.5 1 16.9 31.0,2.8 0.005
 A vs B 10.9 3.3, 18.4 <0.001 37.3 22.1, 52.6 <0.001
 A vs F 2.5 −3.5, 8.5 1 11.1 2.1, 20.2 0.004
 A vs H 5.4 −0.7, 11.6 0.131 28.0 14.4, 41.6 <0.001
Comparison between MK Type for Intl.
 F vs B 1.8 −5.9, 9.4 1 4.6 −14.0, 23.2 1
 H vs B 3.6 −3.3, 10.6 1 2.8 −9.8, 15.5 1
 H vs F 1.9 −4.7, 8.5 1 −1.7 −18.9, 15.4 1
 A vs B 4.2 −4.9, 13.4 1 7.2 −11.4, 25.7 1
 A vs F 2.5 −4.8, 9.7 1 2.6 −8.4, 13.6 1
 A vs H 0.6 −6.9, 8.1 1 4.4 −12.2, 20.9 1
Comparison of Intl. vs US for each MK Type
 B 2.5 −4.2, 9.2 1 20.5 −3.5, 44.5 0.133
 F −4.1 −15.3, 7.1 1 −1.1 −27.1, 24.9 1
 H 0.7 −9.9, 11.3 1 14.0 −10.3, 38.4 0.978
 A −4.1 −17.7, 9.5 1 −9.7 −35.1, 15.8 1
Remaining Comparison
 B Intl. vs F US −5.9 −14.5, 2.8 0.736 −5.7 −30.2, 18.8 1
 B Intl. vs H US −2.9 −11.3, 5.5 1 11.2 −12.8, 35.2 1
 B Intl. vs A US −8.4 −18.3, 1.6 0.198 −16.8 −41.1, 7.5 0.483
 F Intl. vs B US 4.3 −5.3, 13.8 1 25.1 0.2, 50.0 0.037
 F Intl. vs H US −1.1 −12.0, 9.7 1 15.8 −9.3, 40.9 0.735
 F Intl. vs A US −6.6 −18.7, 5.5 1 −12.3 −37.9, 13.4 1
 H Intl. vs B US 6.1 −3.0, 15.3 0.736 23.3 −0.7, 47.4 0.05
 H Intl. vs F US −2.2 −13.0, 8.5 1 −2.9 −27.6, 21.9 1
 H Intl. vs A US −4.7 −16.5, 7.1 1 −14.0 −38.6, 10.6 0.983
 A Intl. vs B US 6.7 −4.5, 18.0 1 27.7 3.1, 52.3 0.011
 A Intl. vs F US −1.6 −14.2, 11.0 1 1.5 −24.1, 27.0 1
 A Intl. vs H US 1.3 −11.1, 13.7 1 18.4 −6.4, 43.2 0.343
Practice Type Private vs Academic −2.8 −9.4, 3.8 0.49 2.2 −19.3, 23.6 1
Hybrid vs Academic −5.7 −12.7, 1.3 0.119 −15.9 −38.7, 7.0 0.377
Other vs Academic 8.7 −3.0, 20.5 0.14 3.6 −34.6, 41.8 1
Hybrid vs Private −2.9 −11.0, 5.2 0.49 −18.0 −44.4, 8.4 0.377
Other vs Private 11.6 −1.0, 24.2 0.075 1.4 −39.6, 42.5 1
Other vs Hybrid 14.5 2.3, 26.6 0.012 19.5 −20.3, 59.2 0.746

B=Bacterial; F=Fungal; H= Herpetic; A=Acanthamoeba; Intl=International; US = United States; CI, Confidence Interval