TABLE 3.
Results of the hyper-viscoelastic properties of breast tissues, reported in the literature.
| Experiment | Tissue types | Experimental protocol | Results/Conclusions | Authors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ex vivo | Adipose Fibroglandular | Indentation tests Preload = 0.5 g 1.0mm and 0.1 Hz Preconditioning: 25 cycles + Test: 5 cycles + Inverse FEM Polynomial strain energy function (N = 2) | Hyperelastic parameters | Samani and Plewes (2004) |
| (C 10, C 01, C 11, C 20, C 02) x 10−4 Nmm-2 | ||||
| Adipose (3.1 ± 0.3, 3.0 ± 0.2, 22.5 ± 3, 38.0 ± 6, 47.2 ± 7) | ||||
| Fibroglandular (3.3 ± 0.4, 2.8 ± 0.3, 44.9 ± 8, 77.2 ± 11, 94.5 ± 13) | ||||
| Adipose (breast and abdominal) | Compression tests Preconditioning: 20 cycles: 10% at 1 Hz Test: 50% at 50%/s + hold for 15 min + Internal variable viscoelastic model elastic part (first-order Ogden - μ and α) + viscous part (superposition of exponentially decreasing functions - β 1, β 2, β 3, β 4, β 5) | Breast deep tissue | Calvo-Gallego et al. (2020) | |
| μ = 0.058, α = 8.875 | ||||
| β 1 = 67.286, β 2 = 20.520, β 3 = 5.584, β 4 = 3.160, β 5 = 2.824 | ||||
| Breast superficial tissue | ||||
| μ = 0.057, α = 7.949 | ||||
| β 1 = 65.934, β 2 = 16.891, β 3 = 3.446, β 4 = 1.861, β 5 = 1.623 | ||||
| Adipose Fibroglandular Mixed Tissues | Indentation tests 0.5–1.0mm and 0.1 Hz Preconditioning: 25 cycles + Test: 5 cycles + FEM models 3rd order Ogden, Veronda-Westman, 2nd order Polynomial and Yeoh models | No statistically significant differences among stress distributions | Dempsey et al. (2021) | |
| IDC | Ramp-relaxation tests 2, 4, 6% strain at 0.1s-1 + hold 180s + FEM model Maxwell model | Long-term shear moduli = 0.31–17.03 kPa | Mojra and Hooman (2021) | |
| Instantaneous shear moduli = 6.03–55.13 kPa | ||||
| Human DAT (breast and abdominal) | Indentation tests | Mean difference (9 points) of displacements between | Haddad et al. (2016) | |
| Preload = 0.1 g | “normal breast” and post-mastectomy(1)/post-lumpectomy(2) | |||
| 1.5 mm and 0.1 Hz | breast reconstructed using various DAT materials for a | |||
| Preconditioning: 20 cycles + Test: 5 cycles | prone-to-supine(3)/prone-to-upright(4) body position change | |||
| + | ||||
| FEM models | Yeoh: (1,3) 5.5 mm; (1,4) 5.4 mm; (2,3) −4.0 mm; (2,4) −0.6 mm | |||
| Yeoh and Ogden models | Ogden: (1,3) 0.8 mm; (1,4) 0.8 mm; (2,3) −5.4 mm; (2,4) −0.7 mm | |||
| Human DAT (breast) | Indentation tests | EDAT = 3.460 ± 1.210 kPa | Omidi et al. (2014) | |
| Preload = 0.1 g | First-order polynomial: (C01, C10) x 10−2 | |||
| 0.5 mm and 0.1 Hz | 3.917 ± 2.653, 9.997 ± 4.671 | |||
| Preconditioning: 20 cycles + Test: 5 cycles | Yeoh: (C10, C20, C30) | |||
| + | 0.1554 ± 3.728 × 10−2, (1.575 ± 0.440)x10−2, (8.820 ± 2.901)x10−8 | |||
| FEM models | Ogden: (μ, α) | |||
| First-order polynomial, Yeoh, Ogden, | 0.3306 ± 8.109 × 10−2, 3.780 ± 0.5431 | |||
| and Arruda–Boyce models | Arruda–Boyce: (μ, λ) | |||
| 0.1813 ± 0.1026, 1.028 ± 0.1655 | ||||
| In vivo | Cancer cases Fibroadenoma Mastopathy cases | MR Elastography | Shear modulus, kpa | Sinkus et al. (2005) |
| Breast cancer = 2.9 ± 0.3; Fibroadenoma = 1.3 ± 0.7 | ||||
| Mastopathy = 1.2 ± 0.4, Surrounding tissue = 0.87 ± 0.15 | ||||
| Shear Viscosity, Pa.s | ||||
| Breast cancer = 2.4 ± 1.7, Fibroadenoma = 2.1 ± 1.4 | ||||
| Mastopathy = 0.8 ± 0.3, Surrounding tissue = 0.55 ± 0.12 |