TABLE 2.
Summary table listing the current challenges and future directions to improve HER2-low scoring.
| Phase | Current challenges | Possible solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-analytical | Variables influencing the IHC staining intensity: fixation, antigen retrieval, reaction time, temperature, and substrate concentration | Implementation and follow-up of strict SOPs, describing precisely the workflow |
| Repeating the test for equivocal results may help to exclude technical problems | ||
| The availability of different antibody clones with varying specificity | Updated guidelines that assess the reliability of commonly used HER2 IHC testing methods | |
| Analytical | The subjective mode of HER2 assessment, observer variability | Rigorous quality control procedures and well-defined guidelines based on amplified clinical trials and patient recruitment to further educate pathologists for higher concordance in scoring |
| Implementation of methodologies to improve HER2 assessment including machine learning approaches | ||
| The heterogeneity of HER2 expression and/or amplification | Recruitment of further diagnostic approaches with a more precise cut-off | |
| Further investigation on whether the presence of intratumor heterogeneity may affect the efficacy of ADCs |
Abbreviations: IHC, immunohistochemistry; SOPs, standard operating procedures; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; ADC, antibody drug conjugate.