Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 3;14:1144290. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1144290

Table 3.

Ranking probability of interventions.

Intervention Clinical effective rate Visual acuity Visual field gray value Microaneurysm volume Hemorrhage area Macular thickness
SUCRA (%) Rank SUCRA (%) Rank SUCRA (%) Rank SUCRA (%) Rank SUCRA (%) Rank SUCRA (%) Rank
CXC+CD 54.02 6 98.51 1 56.74 4 73.19 2 55.29 5 86.23 1
CDDP+CD 88.58 1 41.8 4 59.74 3 36.45 4 59.2 3 80.94 2
QG+CD 66.98 3 49.27 3
SDMUC+CD 60.63 4 86.24 1 49.94 4
MMDHP+CD 43.56 8 67.47 2 45.87 3 72.29 2 57.05 3
HXMMT+CD 40.01 9 23.7 5 94.48 1 18.67 6 48.82 5
CXC 39.97 10
CDDP 69.27 2 70.34 2 91.83 1 58.3 4
QG 57.18 5 23.91 6
SDMUC 47.47 7
DHHYK 30.04 11 33.85 5
CD 2.27 12 6.25 6 0.51 6 0 5 0 7 3.11 7

CD, calcium dobesilate; CXC, Compound Xueshuantong Capsule; CDDP, Compound Danshen Dripping Pill; SDMUC, Shuangdan Mingmu Capsule; QG, Qiming Granule; HXMMT, Hexuemingmu Tablet; DHHYK, Danhong Huayu Koufuye; MMDHP, Mingmu Dihuang Pill, -: no value.