Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2022 Dec 20;23(8):1229–1242. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13418

ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Diabetes education in children and adolescents

Anna Lindholm Olinder 1,2,, Matthew DeAbreu 3, Stephen Greene 4, Anne Haugstvedt 5, Karin Lange 6, Edna S Majaliwa 7,8, Vanita Pais 9, Julie Pelicand 10,11, Marissa Town 12, Farid H Mahmud 13
PMCID: PMC10107631  PMID: 36120721

1. SUMMARY OF WHAT IS NEW OR DIFFERENT

This chapter has been updated with additional details and references on educational approaches for multidisciplinary teams, including cultural adaptation, as well as a section on type 2 diabetes (T2D) in youth. Diabetes education and digital technologies as well as telemedicine, with increased adoption of video or phone appointments, has also been expanded and enhanced.

2. RECOMMENDATIONS/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Education is the key to successful management of diabetes [E].

  • To maximize the effectiveness of diabetes treatment and the advances in diabetes management and technology, including continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), it is advisable that quality assured structured education is available to all young people with diabetes and their caregivers [E].

  • The content, curricula and delivery of structured education needs regular review to ensure it suits the needs of people with diabetes within the community, matches local practice, changes with the changing maturity, and needs of the child and then adolescent; and reflects contemporary diabetes management methodologies and technology [E].

  • Evaluation of structured educational programs should include a measurement of outcomes directly related to diabetes education such as the individual's achievement of self‐selected diabetes care goals; improved psychosocial adaptation; quality of life and enhanced self‐efficacy, in addition to measures of glycemic control. Adequacy of glycemic control should encompass not only HbA1c, but other measures such as time in range, if available, and frequency of hypoglycemia [E].

  • Educational interventions have a beneficial effect on glycemic and psychosocial outcomes in children and adolescents with diabetes [E].

  • Educational interventions shown to be effective include those:

  • Based on clear theoretical psychoeducational principles [E].

  • Integrated into routine clinical care (e.g., as an essential and integral part of care at diabetes onset and ongoing) [A].

  • Part of an ongoing process to provide education in individualized self‐management and psychosocial support [E].

  • Involve the continuing responsibility of parents and other caregivers throughout adolescence [B].

  • Making use of cognitive behavioral techniques most often related to problem solving, goal setting, communication skills, motivational interviewing, family conflict resolution, coping skills, and stress management [A].

  • Utilize new technologies in diabetes care as one of the vehicles for educational motivation [A].

  • Health care professionals require appropriate specialized training in the principles and practice of teaching and education to implement successfully person‐centered behavioral approaches to education, designed to empower young people and caregivers in promoting self‐management [E].

  • A multidisciplinary education team sharing the same philosophy and goals and speaking with “one voice” has beneficial effects on glycemic and psychosocial outcomes [B].

  • It is important that goals and targets for blood glucose and HbA1c align with recommended international guidelines. A major task during the first weeks and ongoing after diagnosis of diabetes is to get the family to agree to pursue the same targets [E].

  • Telemedicine, which encompasses the use of video or phone appointments, between a person seeking care and the health care professional, offers an important alternative to in‐person diabetes review for people who live in remote areas without access to professional counseling and diabetes education resources locally, as well as for routine diabetes care [B].

  • Advancements in technology, combined with widespread adoption of digital devices by people with diabetes and the diabetes team, have created an opportunity to leverage digital platforms to augment diabetes care [E].

  • Mobile and web‐based applications are useful tools for diabetes self‐management education to improve diabetes management [E].

  • Interactive web‐based educational resources are widely used for device‐specific training and education of people with diabetes [E].

  • Diabetes peers and/or diabetes youth leaders can reinforce the principles of living well with diabetes and support the learning of families, especially those living in remote or resource limited settings [E].

3. INTRODUCTION

To maintain quality diabetes management, families perform a multitude of self‐management tasks daily, responding to changes in activity, food, and physiology. The challenge for diabetes health care professionals is to deliver diabetes education that optimizes the family's knowledge and understanding of the condition and its treatment, while simultaneously assisting them to adjust to the impact of diabetes management on their everyday lives. In addition, parents need to combine managing their child's diabetes‐related tasks alongside their usual parenting responsibilities. This challenge is even greater in low‐ and middle‐income countries where limited resources may threaten access to insulin, food security, and the availability of the basic tools to manage diabetes such as glucose and ketone monitoring equipment. Diabetes education is a critical element of diabetes care, regardless of the intensity of the insulin regimen adopted. Diabetes management requires frequent and high levels of educational involvement at diagnosis and ongoing to support the children and adolescents as well as parents and other care givers. 1 , 2 This evidence informed guideline has been adapted and updated with the aim to describe universal educational principles, details regarding content, and organization of diabetes education in children and adolescents and provide consensus recommendations. 3 Many countries have developed their own set of guidelines, appropriate for their health services and cultural backgrounds. 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13

4. DIABETES EDUCATION—DEFINITION AND UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLES

4.1. Definition

A universal definition of diabetes education does not exist. However, the following definition has been proposed:

“Diabetes education is an interactive process that facilitates and supports the individual and/or their families, caregivers or significant social contacts to acquire and apply the knowledge, confidence, practical, problem‐solving and coping skills, needed to manage their life with diabetes to achieve the best possible outcomes within their own unique circumstances.” 14

4.2. Empowerment and person‐centered care

Regardless of insulin regimen used, the complexity of diabetes treatment requires that children with diabetes and their caregivers make numerous daily treatment decisions, necessitating empowerment of the child or adolescent and their caregivers. Empowerment in health care is defined as a motivational approach to assist people to make health‐promoting behavior choices and/or changes. 15 In the field of diabetes, empowerment is defined as the process of helping people discover and use their innate ability to gain mastery over their diabetes. 16 The approach is person‐centered with the health care providers facilitating and providing information and knowledge to assist people in making informed decisions. Persons with diabetes should be empowered to know that they ultimately influence their own lives in making informed decisions about their diabetes. Children and adolescents with diabetes need to have age‐appropriate understanding of diabetes and be empowered to participate in the management of their diabetes. 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 16 , 17

4.3. Accessibility

Every young person with diabetes should have access to comprehensive structured education to help empower them and their families to manage their diabetes in an age‐appropriate manner. 4 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 18 In addition to the child or adolescent and their primary caregivers, other care providers should have access to educational resources and staff and be included in the educational process. 8 , 19 Caregivers in nurseries or kindergarten and school teachers should have access to appropriate structured diabetes education. 20 , 21 , 22

4.4. Personalized education

Educational programs should utilize appropriate person‐centered, interactive teaching methods for all people involved in the management of diabetes. This approach must center around the child or adolescent with diabetes, 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 18 and be adaptable to meet the different needs, personal choices, individualized learning styles of young people with diabetes and their parents, in the context of local models of care. Diabetes education needs to be personalized to the individual's age, stage of diabetes, maturity and lifestyle, culture and learning pace. 4 , 6 , 11 , 12 The sharing of roles and responsibilities for the diabetes treatment tasks between the child or adolescent and their caregivers should be continuously clarified and considered in relation to the need for education. 23 , 24 This personalized diabetes educational approach remains an integral part of the psychosocial support for young people with diabetes and their families.

4.5. Multidisciplinary team

Diabetes education should be delivered by a multidisciplinary team of health care professionals who have a clear understanding of the special and changing needs of young people and their families as they transition through the different stages of life. 4 , 7 , 8 , 11 , 25 Multidisciplinary teams providing education should include, at a minimum, a pediatric endocrinologist/diabetologist or a physician trained in the care of children and adolescents with diabetes, a diabetes specialist nurse/diabetes educator/pediatric nurse, and a dietitian. Furthermore, a psychologist, a social worker or a team member trained in mental health are recognized as essential members of the multidisciplinary team. 6 In areas with limited resources, it is not always possible to have all members of a multidisciplinary team and additional details are provided in the chapter “Limited Care Guidance” (2022 Consensus Guidelines Chapter 25 on Management of diabetes in children and adolescents in limited resource settings).

4.6. Education of the educators

Educators in the multidisciplinary team must take responsibility for maintenance of their professional development to remain up to date with their knowledge and skills. They should have access to continuing specialized training in current principles of insulin therapy, new diabetes technologies, advances in diabetes education, and educational methods as well as client engagement. 4 , 6 , 8 , 11 , 12 , 26 , 27

4.7. Cultural adaptation

Cultural adaptation has been described as the modification of educational approaches to consider language, culture, and context in such a way that it is compatible with the client's cultural patterns, meaning, and values. 28 Due to increased mobility and migration, cultural and language differences may hinder communication and diabetes education. It is recommended that diabetes education is provided with professional translator services if appropriate, and educational material is offered in the family's native language where available. 29

4.8. Ongoing engagement

Diabetes education needs to be a continuous process and be repeated on a regular basis for it to be effective. 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 11 , 12 The priorities for health care professionals in diabetes education may not match those of the child and the family. Thus, diabetes education should be based on a thorough assessment of the person's attitudes, beliefs, learning style, learning ability, readiness to learn, existing evidence, knowledge, and goals. 30

Table 1 summarizes the philosophy of diabetes education in children, adolescents, and their parents. 4 , 8 , 31 , 32

TABLE 1.

Principles and practice of education in children, adolescents, and their parents/primary care givers

1. Motivation
  • The learner needs to and/or have a desire to learn

2. Context
  • Where is the learner now?

  • Where does the learner want to be later?

3. Environment
  • Learner‐centered, comfortable, trusting

  • Enjoyable/entertaining/interesting/“open”

4. Significance
  • Meaningful, important, links, or joins up

  • Reward or gain

5. Concepts
  • Simple to complex in gentle steps (short attention span)

6. Activity
  • Constantly interactive

  • Practical (fitting into real life)

  • Goal setting and problem solving

7. Reinforcement
  • Repetition, review, summarize

8. Reassess, evaluate, audit
9. Move forward (continuing education)

The knowledge base for some key universal principles is explained in the following sections.

5. PROVIDING DIABETES EDUCATION

5.1. Diabetes education and the diabetes health care service

All members of the multidisciplinary diabetes team take part in delivering diabetes education. In the initial phase this will encompass key messages that include; (1) informing young people and their families that they have developed diabetes; (2) initiating diabetes education to explain and/or answer the many questions that arise immediately after receiving the diagnosis; (3) informing the child, adolescent, and their primary caregivers about current “best practices” for the management of diabetes; (4) information about how the young person, their family and support network can promote self‐management of their diabetes after initial education and instruction.

To maximize the impact of education, a diabetes health care service must formally design what they need to teach and what the young person and family need to learn. A diabetes health care service for young people needs to develop their own, culturally appropriate:

Diabetes education curriculum: a detailed list of contents or subjects to be taught by the health professional and learnt by the young people with diabetes and their families.

Diabetes education syllabus: instructions on the delivery, depth of learning and learning outcomes, considering the needs of the person with diabetes, with content of different subjects and methods. Learning outcomes are “statements that describe the knowledge or skills students should acquire by the end of a particular assignment, class, course, or program, and help students understand why that knowledge and those skills will be useful to them.” 33

National and regional programs 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 can and often are adopted by local health services, with sharing of educational resources from other centers, reliable external sources, diabetes support group organizations, and medical societies.

Each Multidisciplinary Diabetes Team needs to construct its own approach to their diabetes education program, based on their health professional numbers, the scope of their health provision resources and social structure of their health environment (Table 2). A check‐list approach has been adopted at most diabetes centers, allowing aspects of the education program to be introduced at a manageable pace for the person with diabetes and with allocation of certain learning tasks to different members of the multidisciplinary team based upon their individual expertise.

TABLE 2.

Key education topics for review at diabetes diagnosis and ongoing engagement

At diagnosis Continuing curriculum
Simple explanation of how the diagnosis was made, the cause of symptoms and need for lifelong insulin replacement. Reassure that with insulin replacement the child will quickly regain health and energy. Pathophysiology, epidemiology, classification, and metabolism
Explore feelings of guilt or blame and discuss uncertainty about the cause of diabetes. Explore child's/adolescent's understanding as they mature
Normalize grief and loss reaction to the diagnosis Address psychological health and diabetes burnout
Discuss risk for siblings and interventions available to minimize risk Revise as needed
Simple explanation of glucose and the relationship between food, blood glucose value, and insulin. Explain other sources of glucose; that is, liver as a source of glucose
Simple explanation that insulin lowers the blood glucose value, rapid‐acting insulin lowers it quickly and long‐acting insulin lowers it slowly.

Insulin action and profile

Adjustment of insulin

Pump extended bolus functions

Introduction to diabetes technology (if available)

Discuss the role and responsibility of family in the delivery and supervision of self‐management tasks and the expectation for frequent follow‐up. Review who is doing what at each visit and encourage active parental involvement. Explore barriers to clinic attendance if missed appointments
Establish clear and consistent treatment targets and goals.

Revise frequently

Goal setting focus on goals that are SMART: specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and time‐based

Micro‐ and macro‐vascular complications, screening protocol, and prevention

Focus on basic survival skills needed to manage diabetes from day one. Accomplishment of these skills will increase the caregiver's and child's confidence in their ability to manage.

Assess competence in
  • SMBG and/or CGM, ketone monitoring
  • insulin devices: injection, pen, or pump
  • diabetes diary or downloading of data from pens, pump, glucose meters, and CGM
  • carbohydrate counting tools
  • insulin storage
Review these skills
  • As new devices or technologies are introduced

  • As child/adolescent takes on self‐management tasks

  • If diabetes needs stabilization

  • In response to episodes of DKA or severe hypoglycemia

  • On diabetes camps

  • When new caregivers are introduced to the family

  • When child/adolescent is planning school camp/excursion

  • During transition to adult service

  • Whenever there are admissions other than due to diabetes or DKA

Basic dietetic advice including carbohydrate counting, importance of healthy eating, and meal‐time routines.

Promotion of healthy body weight.

Clarification of myths about food and diabetes, as well as beliefs about cure in the honeymoon phase.

Explain effect on glucose levels of different food components including protein, fat, fiber, and glycemic index; and discuss insulin therapy management strategies to optimize postprandial glucose levels

Revise nutritional skills as the child grows and develops

Adapt nutritional interventions in response to new diagnosis, for example, celiac disease

Screen for disordered eating

Explanation of hypoglycemia (symptoms, prevention, management), identify cards, bracelet, necklace.

Explanation of hyperglycemia and diabetes ketoacidosis (symptoms, prevention, management).

Revise with introduction of new activities and new caregivers

Practice reconstitution of glucagon

Risk factors: hypoglycemia unawareness, young age

Precautions with alcohol, and driving

Diabetes during illnesses; advise not to omit insulin and to call the diabetes team for advice.

Effect of intercurrent illness, hyperglycemia, ketosis, and prevention and identification of DKA

Diet and fluids of sick days

Sick day management plan (see chapter: Sick day management)

Integration of diabetes self‐management tasks into family life, social activities, sports, and school.

Problem‐solving and adjustments to treatment in everyday life, motivation, and coping with unexpected glucose fluctuations

Review and revise school management plan annually

Exercise, camp, holiday planning, and travel

Address questions about impact on future risk behaviors and aspirations for the child/adolescent

Information to teenagers about alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, and other illegal recreational substances (see chapter about adolescents)

Information about contraception, sexuality, and pregnancy planning

Information about employment

Membership in a diabetes association and other available support services Explore opportunities for peer support and family support
Details of emergency telephone contacts and follow‐up arrangements. Update as required

A completed checklist does not necessarily mean that the young person with diabetes and the family have learned everything they need to know as diabetes education is not a “one off” process. Diabetes education requires constant review, depending on the needs of the person with diabetes and the family with ongoing maturation and adaptation. Many centers will give Education Updates at appropriate times that may include annual assessments with clinical review, starting or changing school, during the adolescent period, at the adoption of new diabetes technologies or with any dietary changes.

5.2. Structured diabetes education programs

There are three key criteria that should characterize a structured educational program 6 :

  • the program has a structured, written curriculum that is aligned with current clinical guidelines

  • uses trained diabetes educators

  • is quality assured

The evidence‐base for the effectiveness of structured education versus informal unstructured education in improving glycemic control 34 , 35 , 36 and preventing severe hypoglycemia and restoring awareness of hypoglycemia 37 comes mainly from studies involving adults with diabetes. These studies have been performed mainly in North America, Australia, and Europe and have been extensively reviewed in various publications. 6 , 8 , 34 Diabetes self‐management education programs are efficacious and cost‐effective in promoting and facilitating self‐management, improving children's diabetes knowledge, skills, and motivation, and have been shown to improve biomedical, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes. 38

There are few studies involving children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and their parents, and the evidence base for the effectiveness of structured education programs is limited. 6 , 8 , 39 , 40 Indirect evidence suggests that countries in which structured education are available for all have better outcomes with respect glycemic control. 41 , 42 , 43 Evidence to assess the impact of a structured education program in children with T1D, suggest that the structured education and support program in the year after diagnosis can improve short‐term glycemic outcomes, measured as HbA1c, but this effect may not persist after discontinuing intensive coaching. This highlights the need for ongoing person‐centered education. 44 A short‐term (1 year) evaluation of a structured initial education program improved child and parent‐reported outcomes. 40 Structured education should be available to all persons with diabetes at the time of diagnosis and reinforced with regular teaching sessions after diagnosis and then annually or more frequently as determined by formal, regular individual assessment of need. 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 A review of relevant qualitative studies in pediatric and adolescent services showed that providing skills training using structured education to people does not necessarily result in participants adopting and sustaining recommended changes in behavior. To sustain diabetes self‐management skills after attending structured education, it is recommended that support be provided over the longer‐term by appropriately trained health care professionals in response to individuals' needs. 6 , 27 , 45 A study of structured education during the pediatric to adult transition period highlighted the importance of carbohydrate counting in predicting glycemic control. 46 This study emphasized that many persons diagnosed and educated in childhood may be more knowledgeable in diabetes management, but their practical skill in matching insulin dose and carbohydrate content is often suboptimal. 46

Effective educational programs are carefully planned, have specific aims and age‐appropriate learning objectives, which are shared with people with diabetes, their families, and other care givers 4 , 6 , 8 , 17 , 47 and are integrated into routine care. Ways to improve access to and uptake of diabetes self‐management programs are needed globally in resource deficient regions. 38 Many less‐resourced countries, which have a high rates of morbidity and mortality, may only be able to provide minimal education and ongoing support. All young people with T1D and their caregivers deserve quality care, with structured diabetes education from a diabetes team or health care professional experienced in pediatric diabetes. 48

5.3. Support programs and diabetes education

The interpretation of educational research is complex relating to the intersection of interventions frequently combining education, psychosocial, and psychotherapeutic methods. 34 , 35 The outcomes most likely to be directly affected by diabetes education are knowledge and understanding, self‐management behaviors, and psychosocial adaptation. 4 , 14 These psychosocial and behavioral outcomes are key requirements for glycemic control. 14 Systematic reviews of psychoeducational interventions conclude that such measures have shown small to medium beneficial effects on glycemic control 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 and a somewhat greater effect on psychological outcomes. 35 , 56 , 57 The effects are more pronounced for children than for adults. 56

Recently, a variety of support methods have been tried in conjunction with defined education programs that include motivational interviewing, life coaching, and a guided self‐determination model. While all of these approaches appear to improve the psychological well‐being and coping strategies of young people, there is often minimal improvement in glycemic control, measured as HbA1c. In addition, the impact is often of short duration, requiring repeated interventions. 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 Because both high glycemic variability and low glycemic variability may be associated with the same HbA1c value it is important to evaluate frequency of hypoglycemia and time in range, if available, when evaluating glycemic control. 63 Education may be seen as an interface between clinical practice and research. Continuing research into diabetes and educational methods is important in improving clinical practice and should be prioritized by diabetes centers, individually as well as part of regional, national, and international networks and registries. 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 12 , 14

5.4. Delivery of diabetes education

Diabetes education is delivered by all members of the diabetes multidisciplinary team who complement each other by working within their scope of practice as guided by their subspecialty. All team members are responsible for assessing the educational needs of the family at each episode of contact and arranging referral to the most appropriate diabetes health care professional to address the family's identified learning needs. 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 11 , 12 , 25 The team should have a sound understanding of the principles governing teaching and learning.

The diabetes team should demonstrate skills consistent with the principles of teaching and structured education and also incorporate behavioral change management including counseling techniques into their therapeutic practice. 26 , 27 Tertiary level diabetes education and clinical management courses are available in some countries along with accreditation programs available to health care professionals wishing to achieve certification. Certified diabetes educators require proficiency in clinical practice, research, diabetes education, and counseling and frequently manage the coordination, delivery, and evaluation of education programs within their health facilities. 64 Guidelines should be developed and evaluated for core competencies for diabetes educators to help ensure quality education is provided to young people with diabetes and their caregivers. 26

Multidisciplinary teams providing education should include, at a minimum, a pediatric endocrinologist/diabetologist or a physician trained in the care of children and adolescents with diabetes, a diabetes specialist nurse/diabetes educator/pediatric nurse, a dietitian, a psychologist, and a social worker. 6 Other professionals such as a play therapist or a Child Life Specialist can play an important role in the diabetes team by providing pedagogical preparation of children and young people for procedures and examinations and support in the educational process for the child with diabetes, parents, and siblings. 65 Furthermore, an occupational therapist can provide pedagogical and practical support, especially to children and adolescents with neuropsychiatric diagnoses. 66 In addition, there is value in trained health or life coaches in helping people with diabetes meet self‐management goals. 59

5.5. Diabetes education—at diagnosis, settings, timing, and cultural considerations

5.5.1. Diabetes education at diagnosis

At diagnosis families may be unreceptive to education due to the emotional stress of the diagnosis or for practical reasons such as fatigue from sleep deprivation due to hospitalization. For this reason, the education program should be tailored to meet the pace dictated by the family's readiness to learn. The initial focus should be on the acquisition of the practical “survival skills” required to manage the diabetes at home and address the immediate concerns expressed by the family. Time should be given for the skills to be practiced and basic concepts should be reviewed within the first weeks of diagnosis. The family should be given a structured plan for education so that they can arrange dedicated time for the education. At diagnosis, concepts are new, and the child or adolescent will need consistent messages and support from parents and other primary care givers. To ensure this occurs both parents or other primary care givers should be encouraged to attend all education sessions.

Initial learning should be reinforced by written guidelines and curricula. It should be accompanied by quality assured education materials (books, booklets, leaflets, websites, social medias, smart phone/tablet applications, games, and other resources) appropriate to the child's and adolescent's age and maturity. 6 , 8 Educational (electronic or printed format) materials should use appropriate language and a style that is easily comprehensible. For parents with limited literacy and/or poor numeracy special materials using diagrams, drawings, video clips, and other visual media are recommended. 67 , 68 All material should follow common therapeutic goals and a shared holistic approach.

Table 2 lists suggestions for the basic initial content of diabetes education at diagnosis and the extension of this content to be delivered and revised at regular intervals over the course of the family's contact with diabetes services. These topics provide a comprehensive basis for successful therapy and positive emotional coping for youth with diabetes and their caregivers. The topics should be adapted to ensure the diabetes education is appropriate to each individual's age, maturity, learning needs, and local circumstances. ISPAD 2022 Consensus Guidelines Chapter 10 on “Nutritional management in children and adolescents with diabetes” has a detailed explanation of the content and methods of delivering nutritional education.

The number of appropriate education hours for a newly diagnosed child or adolescent may depend on the health care system and individual characteristics of the person with diabetes and family. Data from a study in Germany showed that an average of approximately 30 h of theoretical and practical instruction was provided for the parents and/or the child/adolescent with T1D. 69 A study from Canada revealed that certified diabetes educators spent a median of 10.5 h per person with diabetes during the first year after diabetes onset. 70 Interestingly, this study also showed that greater teaching time was needed for young people with diabetes from higher socioeconomic backgrounds as compared with a lower socioeconomic level. It is, however, important that the number of education hours is adapted to the individual needs of the person with diabetes and their family.

5.5.2. Settings, timing, and cultural background

Initial education and diagnosis

Due to the heterogeneity of health care systems and funding of diabetes care and education there is evidence supporting both inpatient and ambulatory approaches to diabetes stabilization and initial education at diagnosis, and studies have shown no difference across relevant outcomes. 32 , 62 , 69 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 A recently published study in the UK health system shows strong evidence that there is no difference between home‐based and hospital‐based initiation of care in children newly diagnosed with T1D across relevant outcomes. 62

Continuing education

Ongoing educational encounters most often take place in an ambulatory (outpatient, domiciliary, community) setting. 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 11 , 12 , 77 , 78 Where staffing levels, expertise and local circumstances do not permit this to occur, educational programs may be carried out in the hospital environment, either by individual teaching or in groups and whenever possible in a protected environment conducive to learning. 71 , 73 , 76 , 78 It is important to adapt the programs to families who may have low literacy and numeracy. 79 For families from different cultural backgrounds, the education needs to be adapted to their food habits and their health belief models. 29

Age‐appropriate, group education approaches directed at the specific needs of individuals can be at least equally effective as individual education and may be more cost effective. 6 In qualitative studies young persons with diabetes often report they appreciate group education. Adolescents also express that meeting others with the same condition and shared experiences can help mitigate the isolation of diabetes. 61 , 80 , 81 During the transition period from adolescence into adulthood there are specific education needs such as self‐management and decision support, and group clinics. 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 Young people also benefit from workshops to prepare for the transition. 86 During the transition, parents also may need support in changing their role. 22 , 87 , 88

The educational experience may be enhanced by peer group education or school friendships. 31 , 89 Diabetes residential and day camps organized by local and national diabetes organizations provide an additional opportunity for learning and review of diabetes management skills in a safe and supportive environment. From a diabetes education standpoint, diabetes camps appear to have an initial impact and are appreciated by young people with diabetes and their caregivers, which is mediated through psychosocial benefits. 90 , 91 , 92 The organization and aims of diabetes camps have been described in detail in the ISPAD Guideline for the delivery of ambulatory care (ISPAD 2022 Consensus Guidelines Chapter 7 on The delivery of ambulatory diabetes care to children and adolescents with diabetes). Educational activities at camp are most effective if they are matched to gender and age and embody empowerment principles. 93 Benefits include the opportunity for youth to foster relationships and share experiences in a safe environment. 94

Digital education, which includes use of technology to promote self‐management and support education, has become increasingly available in diabetes care and offers the ability to promote empowerment and self‐management to youth and their caregivers. 84 , 95

Type 2 diabetes

Youth with T2D may experience distinct challenges as compared with adolescents with T1D or adults with T2D. Treatment modalities that include oral medications differ from T1D treatment and there is often a need for major lifestyle changes, related to food and physical activities. Youth with T2D and their caregivers often reside in minority communities with lower socioeconomic status and experience challenges related to financial and or residential instability. Diabetes educators should be aware of these potential complex psychosocial and cultural environments, which can make the lifestyle changes difficult to implement and may result in decreased engagement by youth with T2D self‐managing their disease. 96 , 97 , 98 These adolescents may have a higher rate of psychological disorders, depression, stigmatization and eating disorders, and need psychological support and/or psychotherapy together with their parents. 99 The role of health care professionals and caregivers is to promote attendance at education sessions and encourage independent self‐management regimens and self‐care practices for optimal clinical outcomes. 96 , 97 , 100 Implementation of culturally specific education have shown improvements in self‐management behaviors, which can help to minimize long‐term risk of complications. 101 Studies also show that there is a lack of structured evidence‐based diabetes education for people with learning disabilities, literacy problems and for non‐English speakers. 97 See ISPAD 2022 Consensus Guidelines Chapter 3 on T2D in youth.

5.6. Diabetes education and intensive treatment methods

Matching and adjusting insulin profiles to quantified food intake and exercise levels is an important part of any intensified diabetes management plan. More complex therapeutic regimens with multiple daily injections, use of different insulins and insulin analogs, CSII, as well as using CGM devices require comprehensive education and practical training. Structured age‐specific education programs for adults, adolescents, or parents of younger children with T1D on the use of real‐time CGM systems and data interpretation have shown improvements in knowledge, satisfaction, glycemic control, and acceptance of real‐time CGM systems. 102 , 103 , 104 Using automated insulin delivery systems or hybrid‐closed loop systems requires comprehensive education and reeducation of all family members on nutrition and carbohydrate counting, safety behaviors, and an understanding of the integration of these elements into the daily activities of the child/adolescent using the system. 105 , 106 , 107 A key prerequisite for these diabetes technologies is that all team members are appropriately trained and able competently to manage these systems.

Higher levels of education, health literacy, and understanding are often required for these interventions to be successful, which require significant investments of time, skill, and resources from the education team. 4 , 8 , 11 , 108 In this context, simply changing from one form of insulin regimen to another as the only means of intervention may not be appropriate and may not improve glycemic control. 25 , 49 The appropriate educational approach to the implementation of diabetes technology is holistic and should address treatment and lifestyle goals that addresses barriers, optimizes glycemic management and is centered around the child with diabetes. In this way, an intensified management plan utilizing comprehensive structured education has a greater likelihood of success, especially if the educators are highly skilled and motivated. 109 , 110

5.7. Diabetes education and digital technologies

Advancements in technology combined with widespread adoption of digital devices by youths with diabetes, their caregivers and their clinicians have created an opportunity to leverage digital platforms to augment diabetes care. The available newer technologies include smart phone/web‐based applications, 55 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 computer games, 115 text messaging, 116 and telephone reminders and telemedical support. 117 These technologies are most effective when they include interactive modes and utilize social media. 34 , 53 , 118 Evidence from group discussions with young people suggests that education using these newer technologies is attractive, and there is further scientific data to support its widespread use. 114 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 However, there is still a lack of robust data on effectiveness in relation to key outcome parameters. 122 , 123

Technology‐based diabetes teaching systems are interactive and aim to engage the user by age specific, animated, and entertaining applications. They are designed to serve different purposes such as tracking and monitoring blood glucose, activity/exercise, healthy eating, medication adherence, monitoring for complications, annual screenings, and problem‐solving. Calorie/carbohydrate counting smart phone applications help people tackle the abstract concept of carbohydrate content in food. Smart phone applications have provided a comprehensive food database and easier access to nutrient data on less common foods including those found in restaurant chains. It can be important to check the source of the current application. Data from national nutrient databases can provide a more accurate carbohydrate content than data from open/crowd sourced information. 124

Digital diabetes tools have been designed for coaching people with diabetes by personalized diabetes education. 125 Users define long‐term goals, such as optimizing nutrition, decreasing blood glucose levels, and receive daily messages to attain specific goals and to reiterate essential concepts of diabetes education. The feedback loop sustained by two‐way communication, where both sender and receiver are engaged, facilitated by way of technology offers the greatest favorable impact on glycemic control. 126 Small studies in pediatric and adult persons with diabetes have shown the benefit of using technology‐based diabetes education on improving confidence, self‐management, quality of life, and glycemic control outcomes. 55 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 127 , 128

Telemedicine, that encompasses the use of video or phone appointments between a person with diabetes and their health care professional, has been particularly helpful for people with diabetes who live in remote areas and do not have access to professional counseling and diabetes education resources or were unable to visit clinics due to the COVID pandemic. 129 , 130 The communication and exchange of medical information are made possible through videoconferencing during a telemedicine session. Clinicians provide real‐time problem‐oriented education for young people with diabetes by using telemedicine to facilitate better decisions by youths with diabetes and health care providers. Telemedicine has been successfully integrated into diabetes management by many diabetes centers of excellence to extend the reach of diabetes education and support when access to care is limited. 131 Telemedicine care has proven to be an effective add‐on to regular out‐patient care, but not a complete replacement for in person face‐to‐face counseling. 132 , 133 , 134 , 135

There are some possible limitations to using high‐tech diabetes tools for education purposes that are being addressed with the collaboration of technology experts, scientists, clinicians, and people with diabetes. Clinicians should warn their youth with diabetes regarding the potential inaccuracies, potential breach of confidentiality, and the risk of being overwhelmed by web‐based information and guide their young people with diabetes and their caregivers to websites and mobile applications that are trustworthy. 122 , 124

6. AGE‐SPECIFIC CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES

The features of normal development common to various ages and stages present unique challenges to diabetes management. For this reason, specific curricula and appropriate education materials and tools are recommended for children and adolescents of different age groups as well as for their parents and other primary care givers. School age children have expressed dissatisfaction that health professionals talk to parents and not to them, and there is some evidence that focused age‐appropriate educational interventions are effective in children and families. 50 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 57 , 136 Table 3 identifies concerns, challenges, and learning opportunities common to the major developmental stages. The ISPAD guidelines chapters on caring for toddlers and preschool children and the chapter on adolescents with diabetes, provide more detailed information. (See ISPAD 2022 Consensus Guidelines Chapter 21 on Diabetes in Adolescence and Chapter 23 on Management of diabetes in very young children with diabetes).

TABLE 3.

Concerns, challenges, and learning opportunities for infants and toddlers, school age children and adolescents with diabetes

Group of children Concern/challenges Learning opportunities

Infant a toddlers

0–3 years

Total dependence on parents and caregivers for injections/management of pumps, food, and monitoring.

Parents may feel increased stress, diminished bonding, and depressive feelings.

Unpredictable erratic eating and activity levels.

Difficulties in distinguishing normal infant behavior from diabetes‐related mood swings, for example, due to hypoglycemia.

Injections, infusion set and sensor insertions, and BG checks seen as pain inflicted by caregivers.

Hypoglycemia is difficult for the child to communicate.

Long‐standing hyperglycemia may be even more harmful

Care in nursery and kindergarten

Requirement of a trusting attachment between infant and caregivers.

Support and education for parents

Education about technical devices

Education on prevention, recognition, risk, and management of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia.

Education for nursery and kindergarten staff

Engagement with dietitian, Psychologists, child life support as needed

Preschool age

3–6 years

Care in nursery and kindergarten

Need help to identify symptoms of high/low glucose values

Learning the meaning of high/low glucose values

Education for nursery and kindergarten staff

Family support

Education for parents, from the whole team

Age‐appropriate education for the child

Engagement with dietitian, psychologist, child life support as needed

School age

7–12 years

Adjusting to the change from home or kindergarten to school.

Developing self‐esteem and peer relationships.

Increasing understanding and learning to help with injections, pump use, and monitoring

Gradual development of the child's independence with progressive stepwise transfer of appropriate responsibilities

Adapting diabetes to school programs, school meals, exercise, and sports.

Not wanting to do self‐management task in public.

Negotiating supervision of diabetes management tasks.

Progressive recognition and awareness of hypoglycemia symptoms

Education for school personal and others.

Family support

Advising parents on the gradual development of the child's independence.

Age‐appropriate education for the child

Clarify the responsibility for self‐management.

Peer‐education

Engagement with dietitian, psychologist, and mental health support as needed

Adolescents

Accepting the critical role of continued parental involvement.

High risk behavior, tobacco, alcohol, legal, and illegal drugs

Importance of appropriate contraception

Promoting independent, responsible self‐management appropriate to level of maturity and understanding.

Emotional and peer group conflicts

Body image issues and weight gain and risk for disordered eating, insulin omission

Ability to prioritize one's health

Learning from each other/ accepting each other's responsibility

Psychologists on the team

Reproductive health education

Supportive technology tools

Assessment of potential risky behaviors using “HEADSSS” communication tool to ask about: home, education and eating, activities/employment, drugs tobacco, alcohol, suicidality, sex, and safety

Engagement with dietitian, psychologist and mental health support as needed Dietitian on the team

Readiness and preparation for transition to adult clinic

7. CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, effective management of diabetes requires time, commitment, effort, and motivation. Age‐appropriate, quality‐assured structured diabetes education must be available to all young people with diabetes and their caregivers to maximize the effectiveness of their treatment. Diabetes education should be delivered by a multidisciplinary team of health care professionals who complement each other by working within their scope of practice as guided by their subspecialty. Diabetes education, designed to empower young people and caregivers in promoting self‐management, starts at diagnosis and needs to be a continuous process, repeated regularly to ensure a positive long‐term outlook. When new diabetes technologies become available, comprehensive structured education for educators, parents and children is a prerequisite for success.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

PEER REVIEW

The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1111/pedi.13418.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

For this guideline all authors have contributed with planning, literature review, drafting and writing the mauscript.

Lindholm Olinder A, DeAbreu M, Greene S, et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Diabetes education in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes. 2022;23(8):1229‐1242. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13418

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

REFERENCES

  • 1. American Diabetes Association . Implications of the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(Suppl 1):S25‐S27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group . Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the development and progression of long‐term complications in adolescents with insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus: diabetes control and complications trial. J Pediatr. 1994;125(2):177‐188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Phelan H, Lange K, Cengiz E, et al. ISPAD clinical practice consensus guidelines 2018: diabetes education in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018;19(Suppl 27):75‐83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Haas L, Maryniuk M, Beck J, et al. National standards for diabetes self‐management education and support. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(Suppl 1):S144‐S153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. IDF . International curriculum for diabetes health professional education. International Diabetes Federation; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Martin D, Lange K, Sima A, et al. Recommendations for age‐appropriate education of children and adolescents with diabetes and their parents in the European Union. Pediatr Diabetes. 2012;13(Suppl 16):20‐28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Waldron S, Rurik I, Madacsy L, et al. Good practice recommendations on paediatric training programmes for health care professionals in the EU. Pediatr Diabetes. 2012;13(Suppl 16):29‐38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lange K, Klotmann S, Saßmann H, et al. A pediatric diabetes toolbox for creating centres of reference. Pediatr Diabetes. 2012;13(Suppl 16):49‐61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. NICE . Diabetes (type 1 and type 2) in children and young people: diagnosis and management. NICE guidelines; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. American Diabetes Association . 13. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes‐2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(Suppl 1):S180‐S199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Neu A, Bürger‐Büsing J, Danne T, et al. Diagnosis, therapy and follow‐up of diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2019;127(S 01):S39‐S72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Wherrett DK, Ho J, Huot C, Legault L, Nakhla M, Rosolowsky E. Type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents. Can J Diabetes. 2018;42(Suppl 1):S234‐S246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Whicher CA, O'Neill S, Holt RIG. Diabetes in the UK: 2019. Diabet Med. 2020;37(2):242‐247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Colagiuri R, Eigenmann CA. A national consensus on outcomes and indicators for diabetes patient education. Diabet Med. 2009;26(4):442‐446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ellis‐Stoll CC, Popkess‐Vawter S. A concept analysis on the process of empowerment. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1998;21(2):62‐68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Funnell MM, Anderson RM, Arnold MS, et al. Empowerment: an idea whose time has come in diabetes education. Diabetes Educ. 1991;17(1):37‐41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kolb L. An effective model of diabetes care and education: the ADCES7 Self‐Care Behaviors™. Sci Diabetes Self‐Manag Care. 2021;47(1):30‐53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. American Diabetes Association . Professional Practice Committee: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes‐2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(Suppl 1):S3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Sullivan‐Bolyai S, Bova C, Lee M, Gruppuso PA. Mentoring fathers of children newly diagnosed with T1DM. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2011;36(4):224‐231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Särnblad S, Åkesson K, Fernström L, Ilvered R, Forsander G. Improved diabetes management in Swedish schools: results from two national surveys. Pediatr Diabetes. 2017;18(6):463‐469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. American Association of Diabetes Educators . Management of children with diabetes in the school setting. Diabetes Educ. 2018;44(1):51‐56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Taha NA, Rahme Z, Mesbah N, et al. Evaluation of the impact of a diabetes education eLearning program for school personnel on diabetes knowledge, knowledge retention and confidence in caring for students with diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;139:348‐356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Olinder AL, Nyhlin KT, Smide B. Clarifying responsibility for self‐management of diabetes in adolescents using insulin pumps: a qualitative study. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(7):1547‐1557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Helgeson VS, Reynolds KA, Siminerio L, Escobar O, Becker D. Parent and adolescent distribution of responsibility for diabetes self‐care: links to health outcomes. J Pediatr Psychol. 2008;33(5):497‐508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Cameron FJ, de Beaufort C, Aanstoot HJ, et al. Lessons from the Hvidoere international study group on childhood diabetes: be dogmatic about outcome and flexible in approach. Pediatr Diabetes. 2013;14(7):473‐480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Alharbi T, Thomacos N, McLelland G. Core competencies for diabetes educators: a scoping review. Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev. 2019;13(4):2671‐2682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Kime NH, Waldron S, Webster E, et al. Pediatric diabetes training for healthcare professionals in Europe: time for change. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018;19(3):578‐585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Castro FG, Barrera M Jr, Holleran Steiker LK. Issues and challenges in the design of culturally adapted evidence‐based interventions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:213‐239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Iovane B, Cangelosi AM, Bonaccini I, et al. Effectiveness of a tailored medical support to overcome the barriers to education, treatment and good metabolic control in children with type‐1 diabetes from ethnic minorities. Acta Bio‐Med. 2018;88(4):477‐482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Cameron FJ, Russell E, McCombe J, O'Connell MA, Skinner T. The clinician factor: personality characteristics of clinicians and their impact upon clinical outcomes in the management of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018;19(4):832‐839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Knowles J, Waller H, Eiser C, et al. The development of an innovative education curriculum for 11‐16 yr old children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Pediatr Diabetes. 2006;7(6):322‐328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Lange K, Sassmann H, von Schütz W, Kordonouri O, Danne T. Prerequisites for age‐appropriate education in type 1 diabetes: a model programme for paediatric diabetes education in Germany. Pediatr Diabetes. 2007;8(Suppl 6):63‐71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Centre for Teaching Support & Innovation, University of Toronto . What Are Learning Outcomes? Accessed April 20, 2022. teaching.utoronto.ca/teaching‐support/course‐design/developing‐learning‐outcomes/what‐are‐learning‐outcomes/#:~:text=Learning%20outcomes%20are%20statements%20that,will%20be%20useful%20to%20them.
  • 34. Murphy HR, Rayman G, Skinner TC. Psycho‐educational interventions for children and young people with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2006;23(9):935‐943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Charalampopoulos D, Hesketh KR, Amin R, Paes VM, Viner RM, Stephenson T. Psycho‐educational interventions for children and young people with type 1 diabetes in the UK: how effective are they? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Mauri A, Schmidt S, Sosero V, et al. A structured therapeutic education program for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: an analysis of the efficacy of the "pediatric education for diabetes" project. Minerva Pediatr (Torino). 2021;73(2):159‐166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Yeoh E, Choudhary P, Nwokolo M, Ayis S, Amiel SA. Interventions that restore awareness of hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(8):1592‐1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Chatterjee S, Davies MJ, Heller S, Speight J, Snoek FJ, Khunti K. Diabetes structured self‐management education programmes: a narrative review and current innovations. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(2):130‐142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Skinner TC, Lange KS, Hoey H, et al. Targets and teamwork: understanding differences in pediatric diabetes centers treatment outcomes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018;19(3):559‐565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. D'Souza RS, Ryan M, Hawkes E, et al. Questionnaire‐based service evaluation of the efficacy and usefulness of SEREN: a structured education programme for children and young people diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus. BMJ Open Qual. 2021;10(3):e001337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Hermann JM, Miller KM, Hofer SE, et al. The transatlantic HbA(1c) gap: differences in glycaemic control across the lifespan between people included in the US T1D exchange registry and those included in the German/Austrian DPV registry. Diabet Med. 2020;37(5):848‐855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Sherr JL, Schwandt A, Phelan H, et al. Hemoglobin A1c patterns of youth with type 1 diabetes 10 years post diagnosis from 3 continents. Pediatrics. 2021;148(2):e2020048942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Charalampopoulos D, Hermann JM, Svensson J, et al. Exploring variation in glycemic control across and within eight high‐income countries: a cross‐sectional analysis of 64,666 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(6):1180‐1187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Hawkes CP, Willi SM, Murphy KM. A structured 1‐year education program for children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes improves early glycemic control. Pediatr Diabetes. 2019;20(4):460‐467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Campbell F, Lawton J, Rankin D, et al. Follow‐up support for effective type 1 diabetes self‐management (the FUSED model): a systematic review and meta‐ethnography of the barriers, facilitators and recommendations for sustaining self‐management skills after attending a structured education programme. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Baretić M, Matovinović Osvatić M, Pavić E, et al. Type 1 diabetes from adolescence to adulthood: is there a permanent need for nutrition education and re‐education? Minerva Endocrinol. 2018;43(1):27‐33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. American Association of Diabetes Educators . An effective model of diabetes care and education: Revising the AADE7 Self‐Care Behaviors(®). Diabetes Educ. 2020;46(2):139‐160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Ogle GD, von Oettingen JE, Middlehurst AC, Hanas R, Orchard TJ. Levels of type 1 diabetes care in children and adolescents for countries at varying resource levels. Pediatr Diabetes. 2019;20(1):93‐98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Rosenbauer J, Dost A, Karges B, et al. Improved metabolic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a trend analysis using prospective multicenter data from Germany and Austria. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(1):80‐86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Hampson SE, Skinner TC, Hart J, et al. Effects of educational and psychosocial interventions for adolescents with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(10):1‐79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Barry‐Menkhaus SA, Wagner DV, Riley AR. Small interventions for big change: brief strategies for distress and self‐management amongst youth with type 1 diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2020;20(1):3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Northam EA, Todd S, Cameron FJ. Interventions to promote optimal health outcomes in children with type 1 diabetes: are they effective? Diabet Med. 2006;23(2):113‐121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Couch R, Jetha M, Dryden DM, et al. Diabetes education for children with type 1 diabetes mellitus and their families. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2008;166:1‐144. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Gage H, Hampson S, Skinner TC, et al. Educational and psychosocial programmes for adolescents with diabetes: approaches, outcomes and cost‐effectiveness. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;53(3):333‐346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Grey M, Whittemore R, Jeon S, Murphy K, Faulkner MS, Delamater A. Internet psycho‐education programs improve outcomes in youth with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(9):2475‐2482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Winkley K, Ismail K, Landau S, Eisler I. Psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2006;333(7558):65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Peyrot M, Rubin RR. Behavioral and psychosocial interventions in diabetes: a conceptual review. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(10):2433‐2440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Winkley K, Upsher R, Stahl D, et al. Systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in children and adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2020;37(5):735‐746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Ammmentorp J, Thomsen J, Kofoed PE, Gregersen TA, Bassett B, Timmermann C. Understanding how different mechanism of life coaching offered to young adults with type 1 diabetes can improve their ability to see opportunities and overcome barriers. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103(3):544‐548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Brorsson AL, Leksell J, Andersson Franko M, Lindholm OA. A person‐centered education for adolescents with type 1 diabetes‐a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Diabetes. 2019;20(7):986‐996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Brorsson AL, Lindholm Olinder A, Viklund G, Granström T, Leksell J. Adolescents' perceptions of participation in group education using the guided self‐determination‐Young method: a qualitative study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017;5(1):e000432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Gregory JW, Townson J, Channon S, et al. Effectiveness of home or hospital initiation of treatment at diagnosis for children with type 1 diabetes (DECIDE trial): a multicentre individually randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019;9(12):e032317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Riddlesworth TD, et al. Validation of time in range as an outcome measure for diabetes clinical trials. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(3):400‐405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. AoDCE Specialists . Education & CE Opportunities. Associations of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Ortiz La Banca R, Butler DA, Volkening LK, Laffel LM. Play‐based interventions delivered by child life specialists: teachable moments for youth with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr Health Care. 2020;34(4):356‐365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Shen X, Shen X. The role of occupational therapy in secondary prevention of diabetes. Int J Endocrinol. 2019;2019:3424727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Janisse HC, Naar‐King S, Ellis D. Brief report: Parent's health literacy among high‐risk adolescents with insulin dependent diabetes. J Pediatr Psychol. 2010;35(4):436‐440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Kerr D. Poor numeracy: the elephant in the diabetes technology room. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4(6):1284‐1287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Lange K, Kleine T, Danne T. Initial education for parents of children with diabetes: effort and outcomes in children and parents. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2011;136(21):1106‐1110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Clarke ABM, Ahsan H, Harrington J, Mahmud FH. Assessing allied health‐care professional time in pediatric type 1 diabetes: associations with clinical factors, technology and social determinants. Can J Diabetes. 2020;44(5):387‐393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Boren SA, Fitzner KA, Panhalkar PS, Specker JE. Costs and benefits associated with diabetes education: a review of the literature. Diabetes Educ. 2009;35(1):72‐96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Clapin H, Hop L, Ritchie E, et al. Home‐based vs inpatient education for children newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2017;18(7):579‐587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Forsander GA, Sundelin J, Persson B. Influence of the initial management regimen and family social situation on glycemic control and medical care in children with type I diabetes mellitus. Acta Paediatr. 2000;89(12):1462‐1468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Jasinski CF, Rodriguez‐Monguio R, Tonyushkina K, Allen H. Healthcare cost of type 1 diabetes mellitus in new‐onset children in a hospital compared to an outpatient setting. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Lawson S, Redel JM, Smego A, et al. Assessment of a day hospital management program for children with type 1 diabetes. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(3):e200347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Tiberg I, Katarina SC, Carlsson A, Hallström I. Children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial comparing hospital versus home‐based care. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101(10):1069‐1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. American Diabetes Association . 12. Children and adolescents: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes‐2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(Suppl 1):S126‐S136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. von Sengbusch S, Müller‐Godeffroy E, Häger S, Reintjes R, Hiort O, Wagner V. Mobile diabetes education and care: intervention for children and young people with type 1 diabetes in rural areas of northern Germany. Diabet Med. 2006;23(2):122‐127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Sherifali D, Berard LD, Gucciardi E, MacDonald B, MacNeill G. Self‐management education and support. Can J Diabetes. 2018;42(Suppl 1):S36‐S41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Taha N, Mesbah N, Rahme Z, Omar D, Sukkar F. Piloting a culturally adapted Arabic structured small‐group education program for adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Med Princ Pract. 2020;29(2):142‐149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Sanders T, Elliott J, Norman P, Johnson B, Heller S. Experiences of self‐management among young adults with type 1 diabetes in the context of a structured education programme: a qualitative study. Diabet Med. 2018;35(11):1531‐1537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Markowitz B, Pritlove C, Mukerji G, Lavery JV, Parsons JA, Advani A. The 3i conceptual framework for recognizing patient perspectives of type 1 diabetes during emerging adulthood. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(7):e196944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Papoutsi C, Colligan G, Hagell A, et al. Promises and perils of group clinics for Young people living with diabetes: a realist review. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(5):705‐712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Hermanns N, Ehrmann D, Finke‐Groene K, Kulzer B. Trends in diabetes self‐management education: where are we coming from and where are we going? A narrative review. Diabet Med. 2020;37(3):436‐447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Ng AH, Pedersen ML, Rasmussen B, Rothmann MJ. Needs of young adults with type 1 diabetes during life transitions ‐ an Australian‐Danish experience. Patient Educ Couns. 2021;105:1338‐1341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Markwart H, Bomba F, Menrath I, et al. Assessing empowerment as multidimensional outcome of a patient education program for adolescents with chronic conditions: a latent difference score model. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0230659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Strand M, Broström A, Haugstvedt A. Adolescents' perceptions of the transition process from parental management to self‐management of type 1 diabetes. Scand J Caring Sci. 2019;33(1):128‐135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Yi‐Frazier JP, Senturia K, Wright DR, Lind C, Malik FS. The clock is ticking: parental stress around emerging adulthood for adolescents with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr Nurs. 2021;62:164‐170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Edraki M, Zarei A, Soltanian M, Moravej H. The effect of peer education on self‐care behaviors and the mean of glycosylated hemoglobin in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2020;8(3):209‐219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Weissberg‐Benchell J, Rychlik K. Diabetes camp matters: assessing families' views of their diabetes camp experience. Pediatr Diabetes. 2017;18(8):853‐860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Weissberg‐Benchell J, Vesco AT, Rychlik K. Diabetes camp still matters: relationships with diabetes‐specific distress, strengths, and self‐care skills. Pediatr Diabetes. 2019;20(3):353‐360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Bultas MW, Schmuke AD, Moran V, Taylor J. Psychosocial outcomes of participating in pediatric diabetes camp. Public Health Nurs. 2016;33(4):295‐302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Barone MT, Vivolo MA, Madden PB. Are diabetes camps effective? Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016;114:15‐22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Fegan‐Bohm K, Weissberg‐Benchell J, DeSalvo D, Gunn S, Hilliard M. Camp for youth with type 1 diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2016;16(8):68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Clement M, Filteau P, Harvey B, et al. Organization of Diabetes Care. Can J Diabetes. 2018;42:S27‐S35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Eva JJ, Kassab YW, Neoh CF, et al. Self‐care and self‐management among adolescent T2DM patients: a review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Winkley K, Upsher R, Keij SM, Chamley M, Ismail K, Forbes A. Healthcare professionals' views of group structured education for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2018;35(7):911‐919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Nadeau KJ, Anderson BJ, Berg EG, et al. Youth‐onset type 2 diabetes consensus report: current status, challenges, and priorities. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(9):1635‐1642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Guideline Development Panel for Treatment of Obesity, American Psychological Association . Summary of the clinical practice guideline for multicomponent behavioral treatment of obesity and overweight in children and adolescents. Am Psychol. 2020;75(2):178‐188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Mc Sharry J, Dinneen SF, Humphreys M, et al. Barriers and facilitators to attendance at type 2 diabetes structured education programmes: a qualitative study of educators and attendees. Diabet Med. 2019;36(1):70‐79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Kellow NJ, Palermo C, Choi TS. Not scared of sugar™: outcomes of a structured type 2 diabetes group education program for Chinese Australians. Health Soc Care Community. 2020;28(6):2273‐2281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Schlüter S, Freckmann G, Heinemann L, Wintergerst P, Lange K. Evaluation of the SPECTRUM training programme for real‐time continuous glucose monitoring: a real‐world multicentre prospective study in 120 adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2021;38(2):e14467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Smith MB, Albanese‐O'Neill A, Yao Y, Wilkie DJ, Haller MJ, Keenan GM. Feasibility of the web‐based intervention designed to educate and improve adherence through learning to use continuous glucose monitor (IDEAL CGM) training and follow‐up support intervention: randomized controlled pilot study. JMIR Diabetes. 2021;6(1):e15410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Pemberton JS, Kershaw M, Dias R, et al. DYNAMIC: Dynamic glucose management strategies delivered through a structured education program improves time in range in a socioeconomically deprived cohort of children and young people with type 1 diabetes with a history of hypoglycemia. Pediatr Diabetes. 2021;22(2):249‐260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Bergenstal RM, Nimri R, Beck RW, et al. A comparison of two hybrid closed‐loop systems in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes (FLAIR): a multicentre, randomised, crossover trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10270):208‐219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Giménez M, Conget I, Oliver N. Automated insulin delivery systems: today, tomorrow and user requirements. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021;15(6):1252‐1257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Phillip M, Bergenstal RM, Close KL, et al. The digital/virtual diabetes clinic: the future is now‐recommendations from an international panel on diabetes digital technologies introduction. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021;23(2):146‐154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Dos Santos TJ, Rodrigues TC, Puñales M, Arrais RF, Kopacek C. Newest diabetes‐related technologies for pediatric type 1 diabetes and its impact on routine care: a narrative synthesis of the literature. Curr Pediatr Rep. 2021;9(4):142‐153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Desrochers HR, Schultz AT, Laffel LM. Use of diabetes Technology in Children: role of structured education for Young people with diabetes and families. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2020;49(1):19‐35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Cristello Sarteau A, Crandell J, Seid M, et al. Characterization of youth goal setting in the self‐management of type 1 diabetes and associations with HbA1c: the flexible lifestyle empowering change trial. Pediatr Diabetes. 2020;21(7):1343‐1352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Mulvaney SA, Anders S, Smith AK, Pittel EJ, Johnson KB. A pilot test of a tailored mobile and web‐based diabetes messaging system for adolescents. J Telemed Telecare. 2012;18(2):115‐118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Pinsker JE, Nguyen C, Young S, Fredericks GJ, Chan D. A pilot project for improving paediatric diabetes outcomes using a website: the pediatric diabetes education portal. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(5):226‐230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. El‐Gayar O, Timsina P, Nawar N, Eid W. Mobile applications for diabetes self‐management: status and potential. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(1):247‐262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Hanberger L, Ludvigsson J, Nordfeldt S. Use of a web 2.0 portal to improve education and communication in young patients with families: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(8):e175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Sparapani VC, Fels S, Kamal N, Ortiz La Banca R, Nascimento LC. A video game for Brazilian T1D children about knowledge of disease and self‐care: a methodological study. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021;28:19322968211017555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Franklin VL, Waller A, Pagliari C, Greene SA. A randomized controlled trial of Sweet talk, a text‐messaging system to support young people with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2006;23(12):1332‐1338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Howells L, Wilson AC, Skinner TC, Newton R, Morris AD, Greene SA. A randomized control trial of the effect of negotiated telephone support on glycaemic control in young people with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2002;19(8):643‐648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Hieftje K, Edelman EJ, Camenga DR, Fiellin LE. Electronic media‐based health interventions promoting behavior change in youth: a systematic review. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(6):574‐580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Jain SR, Sui Y, Ng CH, Chen ZX, Goh LH, Shorey S. Patients' and healthcare professionals' perspectives towards technology‐assisted diabetes self‐management education. A qualitative systematic review. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0237647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Muijs LT, de Wit M, Knoop H, Snoek FJ. Feasibility and user experience of the unguided web‐based self‐help app ‘MyDiaMate’ aimed to prevent and reduce psychological distress and fatigue in adults with diabetes. Internet Interv. 2021;25:100414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Huang Z, Lum E, Jimenez G, Semwal M, Sloot P, Car J. Medication management support in diabetes: a systematic assessment of diabetes self‐management apps. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Zhang S, Hamburger E, Kahanda S, Lyttle M, Williams R, Jaser SS. Engagement with a text‐messaging intervention improves adherence in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: brief report. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018;20(5):386‐389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Lee SWH, Ooi L, Lai YK. Telemedicine for the Management of Glycemic Control and Clinical Outcomes of type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled studies. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Fleming GA, Petrie JR, Bergenstal RM, Holl RW, Peters AL, Heinemann L. Diabetes digital app technology: benefits, challenges, and recommendations. A consensus report by the European Association for the Study of diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) diabetes technology working group. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(1):250‐260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Boren SA, Gunlock TL, Peeples MM, Krishna S. Computerized learning technologies for diabetes: a systematic review. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2(1):139‐146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Greenwood DA, Gee PM, Fatkin KJ, Peeples M. A systematic review of reviews evaluating technology‐enabled diabetes self‐management education and support. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11(5):1015‐1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Peña NV, Torres M, Cardona JA, Iniesta R. Impact of telemedicine assessment on glycemic variability in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013;15(2):136‐142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Lehmkuhl HD, Storch EA, Cammarata C, et al. Telehealth behavior therapy for the management of type 1 diabetes in adolescents. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4(1):199‐208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Giani E, Laffel L. Opportunities and challenges of telemedicine: observations from the wild west in pediatric type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016;18(1):1‐3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Predieri B, Leo F, Candia F, et al. Glycemic control improvement in Italian children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes followed through telemedicine during lockdown due to the COVID‐19 pandemic. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:595735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Wood CL, Clements SA, McFann K, Slover R, Thomas JF, Wadwa RP. Use of telemedicine to improve adherence to American Diabetes Association standards in pediatric type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016;18(1):7‐14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Frielitz FS, Dördelmann J, Lemke S, et al. Assessing the benefits and challenges of video consultations for the treatment of children with type 1 diabetes ‐ a qualitative study among diabetes professionals. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2020;129:831‐836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. von Sengbusch S, Doerdelmann J, Lemke S, et al. Parental expectations before and after 12‐month experience with video consultations combined with regular outpatient care for children with type 1 diabetes: a qualitative study. Diabet Med. 2021;38(6):e14410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. von Sengbusch S, Eisemann N, Mueller‐Godeffroy E, et al. Outcomes of monthly video consultations as an add‐on to regular care for children with type 1 diabetes: a 6‐month quasi‐randomized clinical trial followed by an extension phase. Pediatr Diabetes. 2020;21(8):1502‐1515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Danne T, Limbert C, Puig Domingo M, et al. Telemonitoring, telemedicine and time in range during the pandemic: paradigm change for diabetes risk Management in the Post‐COVID future. Diabetes Ther. 2021;12(9):2289‐2310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Laffel LM, Vangsness L, Connell A, Goebel‐Fabbri A, Butler D, Anderson BJ. Impact of ambulatory, family‐focused teamwork intervention on glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr. 2003;142(4):409‐416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Pediatric Diabetes are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES