Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 12;2012(12):CD004950. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004950.pub3

Codipietro 2008.

Methods Randomised controlled trial 
 I. Masking of randomisation ‐ low risk 
 II. Masking of intervention high risk 
 III. Masking of outcome assessment ‐ low risk 
 IV. Completeness of follow‐up ‐ low risk
Participants 101 full‐term infants at more than 60 hours of age undergoing heel lance for metabolic screening 
 Exclusion criteria: at‐risk pregnancy, medical instability, birth in general anaesthesia, maternal use of opioids, administration of naloxone or phenobarbital in the previous 48 hours and artificial feeding 
 Group 1: 51 neonates 
 Mean (range) GA ‐ 39.3 (+/‐ 1.2) weeks 
 Mean (range) BW ‐ 3318 (+/‐ 402) grams 
 Group 2: 50 neonates 
 Mean (range) GA ‐ 39.4 (+/‐ 1.1) weeks 
 Mean (range) BW ‐ 3308 (+/‐ 430) grams
Interventions Group 1: Breastfeeding
Group 2: 1ml of 25% sucrose
Infants in group 1 were held by mother and breast fed until there was a continuous active suction prior to heel lance. Group 2 infants were laid on a changing table and a bolus of 1 ml of 25% sucrose solution was administered through syringe in the mouth 2 minutes before the heel lance
Outcomes PIPP scale, changes in heart rate and saturation 30 seconds after the procedure, duration of first cry, percentage of crying in the first 2 minutes after the procedure
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation was done by using a computer random number generator. Allocation was concealed using opaque, sealed envelopes, which were opened sequentially by the paediatric nurse who performed blood sampling
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Incomplete blinding as breastfeeding group was held by mother while group 2 infants were laid on a changing table. Assessment of one of the outcomes (cry behaviour) was masked as it was assessed by 2 assistants who listened to tape recordings
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All infants were accounted for in the analysis of outcomes
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All prespecified outcomes were reported on
Other bias Low risk Protocol available. All prespecified outcomes addressed