Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 17.
Published in final edited form as: Res Aging. 2022 Mar 24;44(9-10):734–746. doi: 10.1177/01640275221075739

Table 2.

Participant Sociocultural and Clinical Predictors of Study Partner (SP) Relationship (N = 730).

Bivariate Model OR (95%CI) Full Model OR (95%CI)
Spousal SP (N = 323) (N = 323)
Spouse self-rated healtha 0.61 (0.40–0.95)*** 0.68 (0.41–1.13)
Age 1.35 (1.14–1.60)*** 1.19 (1.00–1.41)*
Woman 0.83 (0.32–2.16)
Years of education 1.11 (1.00–1.23) 1.01 (0.88–1.16)
IADLb 0.98 (0.75–1.29)
BADLc 0.89 (0.70–1.15)
Brother 0.12 (0.04–0.32)*** 0.49 (0.15–1.58)
Sister 0.09 (0.03–0.26)*** 0.27 (0.08–0.93)*
Number of children 0.85 (0.77–1.08)* 0.87 (0.72–1.04)
Adult Child SP (N = 675) (N = 616)
No spouse 17.40 (6.97–43.43)*** 11.96 (2.07–69.16)**
Age youngest childd 0.97 (0.89–1.06)
Living daughter 0.12 (0.06–0.24)*** 0.95 (0.15–6.19)
Living son 0.13 (0.07–0.26)*** 1.28 (0.24–6.75)
Number of children in <10 milese 1.22 (1.08–1.37)*** 1.13 (0.96–1.33)
Number of children 1.08 (1.02–1.15)* 1.21 (1.10–1.33)***
Age 1.11 (1.09–1.14)*** 1.07 (1.04–1.11)***
Woman 3.37 (2.42–4.70*** 2.74 (1.81–4.15)***
Years of education 0.93 (0.90–0.97)*** 0.97 (0.92–1.02)
IADLb 1.38 (1.28–1.50)*** 1.25 (1.10–1.42)***
BADLc 1.26 (1.17–1.36)*** 1.02 (0.91–1.15)
Other SP (N = 730) (N = 664)
No spouse 0.37 (0.20–0.68)*** 0.22 (0.05–0.86)*
Living childrenf 1.29 (1.16–1.43)*** 1.41 (1.28–1.56)***
Age youngest childd 0.92 (0.85–0.99)*
Living daughter 1.92 (0.09–3.38)* 0.25 (0.06–0.94)*
Age 0.97 (0.95–0.998) 1.02 (0.97–1.03)
Woman 0.48 (0.34–0.68)*** 0.67 (0.45–0.99)*
Years of education 1.05 (1.01–1.08)* 1.07 (1.02–1.13)**
IADLb 0.99 (0.92–1.08)
BADLc 0.94 (0.87–1.01) 1.00 (0.92–1.09)

Note. All predictors found to be statistically significant (p < .05) in bivariate analyses were included in full models; OR = odds ratio; 95%CI = 95% confidence interval; IADL = Instrumental Activities of Daily Living; BADL = Basic Activities of Daily Living; SP = Study Partner.

a

1 to 5 with higher rankings being better.

b

IADL = Informant rating of participant’s functioning on five IADLs, where higher scores reflect greater impairment.

c

BADL = Informant rating of participant ‘s functioning on six BADLs, where higher scores reflect greater impairment.

d

Two missing observations.

e

6.5% missing data (n=44).

f

9.0% missing data (n=66).

*

<0.05

**

<0.01

***

<0.001.