Table 2.
Bivariate Model OR (95%CI) | Full Model OR (95%CI) | |
---|---|---|
Spousal SP | (N = 323) | (N = 323) |
Spouse self-rated healtha | 0.61 (0.40–0.95)*** | 0.68 (0.41–1.13) |
Age | 1.35 (1.14–1.60)*** | 1.19 (1.00–1.41)* |
Woman | 0.83 (0.32–2.16) | |
Years of education | 1.11 (1.00–1.23) | 1.01 (0.88–1.16) |
IADLb | 0.98 (0.75–1.29) | |
BADLc | 0.89 (0.70–1.15) | |
Brother | 0.12 (0.04–0.32)*** | 0.49 (0.15–1.58) |
Sister | 0.09 (0.03–0.26)*** | 0.27 (0.08–0.93)* |
Number of children | 0.85 (0.77–1.08)* | 0.87 (0.72–1.04) |
Adult Child SP | (N = 675) | (N = 616) |
No spouse | 17.40 (6.97–43.43)*** | 11.96 (2.07–69.16)** |
Age youngest childd | 0.97 (0.89–1.06) | |
Living daughter | 0.12 (0.06–0.24)*** | 0.95 (0.15–6.19) |
Living son | 0.13 (0.07–0.26)*** | 1.28 (0.24–6.75) |
Number of children in <10 milese | 1.22 (1.08–1.37)*** | 1.13 (0.96–1.33) |
Number of children | 1.08 (1.02–1.15)* | 1.21 (1.10–1.33)*** |
Age | 1.11 (1.09–1.14)*** | 1.07 (1.04–1.11)*** |
Woman | 3.37 (2.42–4.70*** | 2.74 (1.81–4.15)*** |
Years of education | 0.93 (0.90–0.97)*** | 0.97 (0.92–1.02) |
IADLb | 1.38 (1.28–1.50)*** | 1.25 (1.10–1.42)*** |
BADLc | 1.26 (1.17–1.36)*** | 1.02 (0.91–1.15) |
Other SP | (N = 730) | (N = 664) |
No spouse | 0.37 (0.20–0.68)*** | 0.22 (0.05–0.86)* |
Living childrenf | 1.29 (1.16–1.43)*** | 1.41 (1.28–1.56)*** |
Age youngest childd | 0.92 (0.85–0.99)* | |
Living daughter | 1.92 (0.09–3.38)* | 0.25 (0.06–0.94)* |
Age | 0.97 (0.95–0.998) | 1.02 (0.97–1.03) |
Woman | 0.48 (0.34–0.68)*** | 0.67 (0.45–0.99)* |
Years of education | 1.05 (1.01–1.08)* | 1.07 (1.02–1.13)** |
IADLb | 0.99 (0.92–1.08) | |
BADLc | 0.94 (0.87–1.01) | 1.00 (0.92–1.09) |
Note. All predictors found to be statistically significant (p < .05) in bivariate analyses were included in full models; OR = odds ratio; 95%CI = 95% confidence interval; IADL = Instrumental Activities of Daily Living; BADL = Basic Activities of Daily Living; SP = Study Partner.
1 to 5 with higher rankings being better.
IADL = Informant rating of participant’s functioning on five IADLs, where higher scores reflect greater impairment.
BADL = Informant rating of participant ‘s functioning on six BADLs, where higher scores reflect greater impairment.
Two missing observations.
6.5% missing data (n=44).
9.0% missing data (n=66).
<0.05
<0.01
<0.001.