Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 17;23:352. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10778-6

Table 3.

Percentage of patients with a high (≥50%), low (1–49%) or negative (< 1%) PD-L1 status by treatment type among aNSCLC patients (A) or those with known PD-L1 status (B) receiving 1L CIT alone, combination chemotherapy and CIT, or chemotherapy

A.
PD-L1a category KRAS G12C KRAS WT

1L CIT alone patients

(N = 72)

1L combination chemotherapy + CIT patients

(N = 101)

1L Chemotherapy patients (N = 281)

1L CIT alone patients

(N = 145)

1L combination chemotherapy + CIT patients

(N = 262)

1L Chemotherapy patients (N = 937)
High (≥50%) 43 (59.7) 18 (17.8) 22 (7.8) 65 (44.8) 27 (10.3) 47 (5.0)
Low (1–49%) 10 (13.9) 24 (23.8) 35 (12.5) 23 (15.9) 63 (24.0) 122 (13.0)
Negative (< 1%) 2 (2.8) 21 (20.8) 23 (8.2) 7 (4.8) 74 (28.2) 147 (15.7)
Missing/unknown 17 (23.6) 38 (37.6) 201 (71.5) 50 (34.5) 98 (37.4) 621 (66.3)
B.
PD-L1a category excluding unknown KRAS G12C KRAS WT

1L CIT alone patients

(N = 55)

1L combination chemotherapy + CIT patients

(N = 63)

1L chemotherapy patients (N = 80)

1L CIT alone patients

(N = 95)

1L combination chemotherapy + CIT patients

(N = 164)

1L chemotherapy patients (N = 316)
High (≥50%) 43 (78.2) 18 (28.6) 22 (27.5) 65 (68.4) 27 (16.5) 47 (14.9)
Low (1–49%) 10 (18.2) 24 (38.1) 35 (43.8) 23 (24.2) 63 (38.4) 122 (38.6)
Negative (< 1%) 2 (3.6) 21 (33.3) 23 (28.8) 7 (7.4) 74 (45.1) 147 (46.5)

1L first line; aNSCLC advanced non-small cell lung cancer; CIT cancer immunotherapy; PD-L1 programmed death-ligand 1; WT wild type

aPD-L1 high was defined as Tumor Proportion Score ≥ 50%, low 1–49% and negative < 1%