TABLE 2.

Delphi process results for statements rewritten and resurveyed (n = 12)

Question	Round	Question/statement	Consensus (% agree, disagree [all others neutral])	Accepted (yes/no)
1	1	Steroid‐eluting stent placement should only be considered in sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps	14%, 57%
	2	Steroid‐eluting stent placement should primarily be considered in sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps	67%, 16%	No
2	1	Steroid‐eluting stent placement could be considered in sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps	92%, 8%
	2	Steroid‐eluting stent placement could be considered in sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps	92%, 0%	Yes
6	1	No more than 2 steroid‐eluting stents should be placed in each sinonasal cavity	50%, 0%
	2	Only one steroid‐eluting stent should generally be used in each sinonasal cavity	58%, 25%	No
8	1	Propel should never be placed in an acutely infected field	25%, 21%
	2	PROPEL can be considered for placement in an acutely infected field if the surgeon believes it is in the best interest of the patient	58%, 25%	No
11	1	SINUVA should only be placed if a total ethmoidectomy has been performed	71%, 14%
	2	SINUVA is most optimally positioned only if total ethmoidectomy has been performed	83%, 17%	Yes

Note: Question 2 was resurveyed despite reaching agreement as it was directly correlated with question 1.