Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 4;10(4):484–496. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51736

Table 1.

Clinical studies on parkinsonism in autism spectrum disorders.

Study Design Population Sample size Criteria for ASD diagnosis Method of parkinsonism assessment Age, years Female, N (%) Quality a
Croen et al, 2015 b Case–control Adults with ASD 1507/15,070 ICD‐9 codes in the electronic medical record system of Kaiser Permanente in Northern California 29 + 12.2/29.4 + 12.1 405 (26.9%)/4050 (26.9%) 10/10
FitzGerald et al, 1990 Cross‐sectional Rett syndrome 32 Motor‐behavioral assessment scale and assessment of ≥2 videotapes Assessment of ≥1 videotape over 2‐year follow‐up Range 30 months to 28 years 32 (100%) 8/9
Geurts et al, 2022 Cross‐sectional ASD adults without suspected intellectual disability

Netherlands sample: 296

US sample: 209

DSM‐4 or DSM‐5 Parkinsonism Screening Questionnaire (parkinsonism defined as ≥7)

Netherlands sample: 58.4 + 5.9

US sample: 59.35 + 7.15

Netherlands sample: 113 (38%)

US sample: 109 (52%)

9/9
Hand et al, 2020 b Case–control Older adults (ages ≥65 years) with ASD 4685/46,850 ICD‐10 codes from Medicare Standard Analytic Files

65–69 years

2,442 (52.1%)/24,420 (52.1%)

70–74 years

1190 (25.4%)/11,900 (25.4%)

≥75 years

1053 (22.5%)/10,530 (22.5%)

1510 (32.2%)/15,100 (32.2%) 10/10
Humphreys and Barrowman, 2016 Cross‐sectional Rett syndrome 51 Standardized historical questionnaire and neurologic examination Rett Syndrome Rigidity Distribution score c Range 2 years 5 months to 54 years 51 (100%) 8/9
Mostert‐Kerckhoffs et al, 2020 b Case–control Children and adolescents with ASD

6–12 years: 22/22

13–26 years: 23/26

ADI‐R and ADOS UPDRS and mechanical assessment

6–12 years: 10.4 + 1.7/10.3 + 1.8

13–26 years: 18.7 + 4.6/20.2 + 4.1

6–12 years: 5 (22.7%)/5 (22.7%)

13–26 years: 6 (26.1%)/6 (23.1%)

8/10
Starkstein et al, 2015 d Cross‐sectional Adults with autism

Study 1: 19

Study 2: 37

DSM‐5, ADI‐R, and ADOS UPDRS and MDS‐UPDRS

Study 1: 57 + 6.7

Study 2: 51.2 + 8.5

Study 1: 0

Study 2: 5 (13.5%)

8/9
Young et al, 2020 Cross‐sectional Rett syndrome 14 Revised diagnostic criteria by Neul et al Videotapes assessed by ≥2 independent assessors 9.2 + 5.4 14 (100%) 8/9

ADI‐R, Autism Diagnostic Interview‐Revised; ADOS, Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule; ASD, autism spectrum disorders; DSM, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; ICD, International Classification of Diseases; MDS, Movement Disorder Society; UPDRS, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale; US, United States.

a

The quality of cross‐sectional studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Checklist for Prevalence Studies (rated out of 9 points), and case–control studies using the Checklist for Case–Control Studies (rated out of 10 points).

b

Relevant variables (i.e., sample size, age, and proportion of females) were reported as cases/controls for these case–control studies.

c

The Rett Syndrome Rigidity Distribution score is an investigator‐developed survey evaluating the extent of rigidity in Rett syndrome.

d

The authors first conducted a hypothesis‐generating pilot study of 19 adults with ASD, followed by a second study of 37 individuals with ASD to confirm their findings.