Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 9;12(6):e027881. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027881

Table 3.

Associations of Parental History of HF, CVD, and Risk Factors With Cardiac Structure and Function in Offspring

Parental history β estimate SE P value* Interaction with PHx of HF P value
Outcomes
LAD HF 0.06 0.01 <0.001
Smoking 0.02 0.01 0.14 0.01
Hypertension 0.01 0.01 0.26 0.05
Diabetes −0.001 0.01 0.94 0.98
Obesity 0.01 0.01 0.19 1.00
Hypercholesterolemia 0.002 0.01 0.83 0.54
LVEDD HF 0.02 0.01 0.23
Smoking −0.01 0.01 0.39 0.26
Hypertension −0.02 0.01 0.10 0.84
Diabetes −0.01 0.01 0.34 0.58
Obesity 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.10
Hypercholesterolemia −0.004 0.01 0.67 0.44
LVWT HF 0.016 0.007 0.04
Smoking 0.001 0.006 0.85 0.52
Hypertension −0.006 0.005 0.25 0.37
Diabetes −0.015 0.007 0.04 0.89
Obesity 0.005 0.005 0.38 0.03
Hypercholesterolemia −0.011 0.005 0.04 0.51
LV mass HF 2.91 1.22 0.02
Smoking −0.65 0.91 0.47 0.76
Hypertension −1.44 0.86 0.09 0.34
Diabetes −2.45 1.16 0.03 0.73
Obesity 1.54 0.88 0.08 0.02
Hypercholesterolemia −1.38 0.86 0.11 0.96
LVFS HF 0.04 0.15 0.77
Smoking −0.16 0.12 0.18 0.58
Hypertension 0.04 0.11 0.68 0.98
Diabetes −0.08 0.15 0.59 0.53
Obesity −0.14 0.11 0.20 0.64
Hypercholesterolemia −0.06 0.11 0.59 0.40
GLS HF 0.12 0.13 0.35
Smoking 0.03 0.10 0.79 0.64
Hypertension 0.15 0.09 0.11 0.46
Diabetes 0.16 0.12 0.20 0.38
Obesity 0.09 0.09 0.32 0.27
Hypercholesterolemia 0.13 0.09 0.16 0.21
CAC HF 0.24 0.08 0.002
Smoking −0.06 0.08 0.48 0.09
Hypertension 0.05 0.08 0.55 0.13
Diabetes 0.25 0.09 0.008 0.01
Obesity 0.03 0.08 0.69 0.06
Hypercholesterolemia 0.11 0.07 0.12 0.79

CAC indicates coronary artery calcification; CVD, cardiovascular disease; GLS, global longitudinal strain; HF, heart failure; LAD, left atrial diameter; LVEDD, left ventricular end‐diastolic dimension; LVFS, left ventricular fractional shortening; LVWT, left ventricular wall thickness; and PHx, parental history.

*

Multivariable analyses adjusted for age, sex, cohort, systolic blood pressure, hypertension treatment, body mass index, diabetes, smoking status, and total cholesterol/high‐density lipoprotein ratio.

Models for GLS were adjusted additionally for heart rate. β estimate represents between‐group differences in each outcome.

CAC scores were natural log‐transformed.