Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 4;7(3):100041. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.100041

TABLE 4.

Association between diet quality indices and gestational weight gain, Tanzania 2001–2005 (N = 7025)

Severely inadequate weight gain
Inadequate weight gain
Excessive weight gain
Energy-adjusted RR (95% CI) Multivariable RR (95% CI) Energy-adjusted RR (95% CI) Multivariable RR (95% CI) Energy-adjusted RR (95% CI) Multivariable RR (95% CI)
Model 1: Diet diversity
 <2 Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
 2 to <3 0.67 (0.36, 1.26) 0.76 (0.40, 1.45) 0.54 (0.29, 1.00) 0.63 (0.33, 1.20) 0.88 (0.40, 1.92) 0.67 (0.31, 1.43)
 3 to <4 0.66 (0.35, 1.24) 0.87 (0.45, 1.66) 0.52∗∗ (0.27, 0.97) 0.68 (0.36, 1.31) 1.03 (0.47, 2.25) 0.69 (0.32, 1.50)
 ≥4 0.41∗ (0.20, 0.84) 0.61 (0.29, 1.27) 0.52 (0.26, 1.05) 0.73 (0.36, 1.51) 1.2 (0.52, 2.78) 0.82 (0.35, 1.93)
Model 2: Global Diet Quality Score
 Tercile 1 Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
 Tercile 2 0.89 (0.76, 1.04) 0.91 (0.78, 1.07) 0.82∗ (0.70, 0.96) 0.82∗∗ (0.70, 0.97) 1.08 (0.91, 1.29) 1.07 (0.89, 1.30)
 Tercile 3 0.86 (0.73, 1.00) 0.96 (0.81, 1.13) 0.93 (0.79, 1.09) 0.98 (0.83, 1.16) 1.05 (0.88, 1.25) 1.07 (0.88, 1.31)

Values are risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals from multinomial regressions adjusted for total energy intake, prepregnancy body mass index, maternal age, maternal education, maternal height, wealth quartile, alcohol use, and supplementation group: ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.