Skip to main content
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes logoLink to Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
. 2023 Apr 17;21:36. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02117-x

Health-related quality of life among patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional survey

Mignote Hailu Gebrie 1,, Hussen Mekonnen Asfaw 2, Workagegnehu Hailu Bilchut 3, Helena Lindgren 4,5, Lena Wettergren 4,6
PMCID: PMC10111728  PMID: 37069562

Abstract

Background

Measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) enables identification of treatment-related side effects of a disease. Such aspects may negatively impact on patients’ lives and should be taken into consideration in medical decision-making. In sub-Saharan Africa, research from the perspective of patients with chronic kidney disease is scarce, and it is almost non-existent in patients undergoing hemodialysis. We aimed to determine HRQOL among end-stage renal disease patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis in Ethiopia and to identify factors associated with HRQOL.

Methods

A multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia directed to all patients receiving hemodialysis due to kidney failure at 11 randomly-selected government and private hospitals/dialysis centers in the capital of Ethiopia. Data were collected by trained nurses using the KDQOL-36 instrument with five subscales measuring generic and disease-specific HRQOL. Study-specific items were used to collect socio-demographic and clinical data. Factors associated with HRQOL were examined using multivariable linear regression models.

Results

Four hundred eighty-one patients completed the survey through face-to-face interviews (response rate 96%; mean age 45.34 ± 14.67). The mean scores of the subscales ranged from 25.6 to 66.68 (range 0–100), with higher scores reflecting better health. Factors associated with low HRQOL included older age, female sex, no formal education, poor medication adherence, > 2 hemodialysis sessions/week, lower body mass index (< 18.5), longer duration of hemodialysis treatment (≥ 12 months), and poor social support.

Conclusion

Patients with kidney failure undergoing hemodialysis in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, had low HRQOL across all subscales compared to previous studies. Therefore, the implementation of guidelines is crucial to improve patients’ adherence to their prescribed medications. Furthermore, establishing patient support groups and encouraging patients to use the available support resources from family members, neighbors, and friends have the potential to improve patients’ HRQOL.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12955-023-02117-x.

Keywords: End-stage renal disease, Hemodialysis, Health-related quality of life, KDQOL-36, Kidney failure, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a public health problem worldwide, and the number of people who require renal replacement therapy is increasing [1, 2]. CKD is defined as either kidney damage or a glomerular filtration rate below 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 that lasts for ≥ 3 months [3, 4]. End-stage renal disease (ESRD), lately suggested to be labelled as “kidney failure” [5], is the final stage of CKD, and a serious health condition which has progressive and debilitating effects on a patient’s life [2, 6]. According to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Working Group on the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease’s revised 2012 classification [7], CKD is classified based on cause, glomerular filtration rate (G1, G2, G3a, G3b, G4, and G5), and albuminuria category (A1, A2, and A3).

The leading cause of CKD is diabetes mellitus, followed by hypertension, glomerulonephritis, polycystic kidney disease, tubule–interstitial diseases, and genetic disorders [8, 9]. A systematic analysis conducted for the Global Burden of Disease Study reported that the burden of CKD in 2017 was much higher in sub-Saharan Africa than would be expected for its level of development [10].

The incidence and prevalence of ESRD continue to increase worldwide [2, 6]. However, the burden in Africa is not established due to inadequate registration systems, with the highest registered prevalence in Tunisia and Egypt, at 713 and 669 per million population, respectively [11]. Although the true burden of ESRD in Sub-Saharan Africa is unknown, it is assumed to be high, with risk factors including both communicable and non-communicable diseases [12].

Renal replacement therapy—including hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and renal transplantation—is the primary treatment for patients with ESRD [13]. Renal transplantation is the best form of therapy for most patients [2]. Hemodialysis is the most commonly utilized treatment method in low-resource countries, although its provision is challenging [2, 14]. Moreover, while hemodialysis has improved patient survival, patients undergoing hemodialysis suffer from a range of health problems, including sleep disorders, peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, stress, emotional distress, cognitive impairment, pain, and sexual dysfunction [15, 16]. It is also time-intensive, expensive, and often results in loss of freedom, dependence on caregivers, disruption of family and social life, and reduced or complete loss of financial income [17].

According to the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017, [10], Ethiopia had close to 5 million estimated cases of CKD and approximately 9000 deaths. The age-standardized rate of CKD was reported to be 9376 per 100,000 population. The incidence of CKD is increasing in Ethiopia, due to the rising prevalence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, which are well-known risk factors for CKD [18]. Currently, hemodialysis is the only type of dialysis offered to ESRD patients in Ethiopia. The vast majority of ESRD patients receive palliative care because they cannot afford or access a dialysis facility. Excluding the cost of medications for comorbidities, and other ancillary costs, the average cost of a single hemodialysis session in the private sector is 2300 Ethiopian birr (equivalent to USD 51) [19]. Dialysis for the treatment of ESRD has been available for less than two decades in Ethiopia. It is mainly accessible to rich people who are living in Addis Ababa and other large cities who can afford the high cost of dialysis and other ESRD-related care [20].

In patients with ESRD for whom curative treatment is not a realistic goal, the primary objective of care is often enhancing health-related quality of life, which is emphasized in the current care provision [14, 21]. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is a broad multidimensional concept including at least three domains: physical, psychological, and social functioning [22]. HRQOL is subjective and focuses on the impact of a perceived health state on a patient’s ability to live a fulfilling life. Its measurement has significance for the evaluation and follow-up of chronic patients involved in lifelong intervention services like hemodialysis [14, 23]. In order to provide holistic care, and in keeping with World Health Organization’s (WHO) definition of health as not only the absence of disease and infirmity but also the presence of physical, mental, and social well-being, HRQOL has become increasingly important [24].

Globally, several studies have reported that ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis have poor HRQOL [2530]. Several factors, clinical, socio-demographic and behavioural, have shown to be associated to HRQOL including age, sex, educational status, employment status and comorbidities. However, few studies have investigated HRQOL in patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis in Africa [3133] and only three in Ethiopia [3436]. Two of them included all patients with CKD (stage 1 to 5) [35, 36]. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine HRQOL, and factors associated with HRQOL, among patients with ESRD undergoing maintenance hemodialysis in Ethiopia.

Methods

Study design and setting

A multi-center institution-based cross-sectional study was employed during a three-month period from February to April 2021. The study was conducted in both governmental and private hospitals and dialysis centers located in Addis Ababa. According to data obtained from Addis Ababa’s city health bureau, there were 4 governmental and 16 private hospitals providing hemodialysis service in the city. Data were collected from 11 randomly selected (2 governmental and 9 private) hospitals and dialysis centers.

Sample

A probability sampling strategy was applied by randomly selected 11 (2 governmental and 9 private) hospitals/dialysis centers in the larger area of the capital in Ethiopia. The study covered all eligible patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis in the 11 selected hospitals/dialysis centers. Inclusion criteria were patients ≥ 18 years with ESRD (according to medical records) who had been on regular maintenance hemodialysis for at least three months. Patients with a documented diagnoses of Alzheimer’s disease, dementia or other cognitive impairments were excluded from the study (n = 3).

Measures

The KDQOL-36 instrument

The KDQOL-36 is an established self-report instrument that was developed for individuals with kidney disease and those on dialysis [37]. KDQOL-36 includes the Medical Outcomes Study’s 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), one of the most widely used generic measures of HRQOL, and 24 disease-specific items related to kidney disease. The SF-12 includes two domains: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). The disease-specific items encompass three domains, which assess Burden of Kidney Disease (BKD), Symptoms and Problems of Kidney Disease (SPKD), and Effects of Kidney Disease (EKD). The BKD scale has four items (e.g., “I feel like a burden to my family”), with five response options that range from “definitely true” to “definitely false”. The SPKD scale has 12 items, each representing a symptom or side effect of kidney disease (e.g., “muscle soreness”), with five response options ranging from “not at all bothered” to “extremely bothered”. The EKD scale has eight items (e.g., “fluid restriction”), with the same response options as the Symptoms/Problems subscale. Each scale’s raw scores are converted to a possible range of 0–100, with higher scores reflecting better health and fewer symptoms. Mean scores for the five main domains were generated using the Hays algorithm [38]. The original English version of the KDQOL-36 has been shown to be reliable and valid for assessing hemodialysis patients’ HRQOL in various nations [29, 37]. The original KDQOL-36 instrument was translated into the local language (Amharic), and the preliminary Amharic version was psychometrically evaluated and found to be reliable and valid for an Ethiopian context [39]. Cronbach alpha in the present study ranged from 0.78 (Burden of kidney disease) to 0.91 (Symptoms of kidney disease).

The simplified medication adherence questionnaire

Adherence to medication was assessed using the six-item Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire [40]. A total score of 12 is considered to reflect adherence to medication, while scores < 12 indicate non-adherence. The tool has demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability in an Amharic-speaking population [40]. Cronbach alpha in the present study was 0.82.

The oslo social support scale

The Oslo Social Support Scale was used to measure the participants’ perceived social support [41]. The scale consists of three items assessing the patient’s number of close contacts, their sense of concern from other people, and their relationship with their neighbors, with a focus on the accessibility of practical help. The responses are scored from 3 to 14, with higher values reflecting a stronger level of social support. The level of social support is classified into three groups based on the total score (poor = 3–8, moderate = 9–11, and strong = 12–14). The Oslo Social Support Scale has been used in a number of studies and found to be practicable, with strong predictive and convergent validity [42]. Cronbach alpha in the present study was 0.71.

Study-specific items were used to collect socio-demographic data (age, sex, education, residence, marital status, family size, occupation, and monthly family income). Clinical characteristics were extracted from patients’ medical records. Behavioral factors were assessed using 17 study-specific items (supplementary material).

Procedure

Data were collected after obtaining permission from each hospital’s administrative body. Patients were identified through patient lists generated by the head nurse of each dialysis unit. Potential participants were approached during treatment and given written and oral information about the study’s aims and procedures. Participants were informed that non-participation would not affect care or treatment in any way. Data were collected by face-to-face interviews by nurses with baccalaureate degrees working outside the individual hospital where data were collected. Data collectors and supervisors were trained on study procedures, questionnaires, data collection techniques, and study ethics for three days. Clinical data were extracted from individual patients’ medical records.

Data processing and analysis

STATA version 14 software was used for statistical analysis [43], and the KDQOLTm-36 Excel scoring program (version 2.0) was used to compute the scale scores (http://www.rand.org/health/surveys_tools/kdqol.html). Mean scores and standard deviations of the five subscales were calculated [38]. Multivariable linear regression was conducted to identify associations between socio-demographic factors (age, sex, marital status, education, occupation, monthly family income, family size, funding/sponsor, and distance from hospital/dialysis center), clinical factors (comorbidities, number of hemodialysis sessions per week, vascular access type, duration of hemodialysis, family history of CKD, medication adherence, anemia, and body mass index [BMI]), behavioral factors (khat chewing, cigarette smoking, and alcohol use) and social support for each HRQOL domain. We performed a model fitness test to look for any clustering effects at the hospital level, but there were none in any of the KDQOL-36 instrument’s domains. We checked the regression model’s assumptions by inspecting the plots of residuals versus predicted values to check the normality, linearity, and homoscedasticity of our data. Multicollinearity was checked by calculating the mean VIF (variance inflation factor). All variables were entered one at a time, and a stepwise backward model building technique was used where variables with the largest p-value were removed step-by-step to construct the final model. Results are reported as the estimated regression coefficient ‘β’. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics

A total of 502 patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis were approached, and 481 patients completed the survey (for a response rate of 96%). The age range of the participants was between 18 and 70 years (mean 45.34 ± 14.67). About one fourth of the patients lacked formal education (16.2%) or had completed primary school (10.4%), while a majority had undergone secondary school (27.7%) or at least reached a certificate level (45.7%). Almost half of the participants were unemployed 239 (49.7%). Only 93 (19.3%) of the study participants had funding for their dialysis treatment (Table 1).

Table 1.

Socio-demographic characteristics of patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (n = 481)

Variables Category Numbers (n) Percent (%)
Sex Men 307 63.8
Women 174 36.2
Age (years), Mean (SD) 45.34 (SD ± 14.67)
Residence In Addis Ababa 391 81.3
Outside Addis Ababa 90 18.7
Marital status Ever married 358 74.4
Single 123 25.6
Educational status No formal education 78 16.2
Primary 50 10.4
Secondary 133 27.7
Certificate and above 220 45.7
Monthly family income ≤ 6500 birr (123 USD) 252 52.4
> 6500 birr (123 USD) 229 47.6
Occupation Employed 242 50.3
Unemployed 239 49.7
Funding/Sponsor Yes 93 19.3
No 388 80.7
Family Size Single household 8 1.7
2–4 177 36.8
≥ 5 296 61.5
Distance to hospital/center, km ≤ 10 280 58.2
> 10 201 41.8
Hospital type Governmental 63 13.1
Private 418 86.9

Clinical characteristics

In this study, hypertension 167 (34.7%) and diabetes mellitus 160 (33.3%) were the most common underlying diseases of ESRD patients on hemodialysis. The duration of hemodialysis ranged from 4 to 96 months. Approximately half of the respondents were adherent to their medication, and one-third of respondents’ ratings indicated that they had strong social support (Table 2).

Table 2.

Clinical characteristics of patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (n = 481)

Variables Category Numbers (n) Percent (%)
Comorbidities Yes 445 92.5
No 36 7.5
Number of hemodialysis sessions per week 1–2 295 61.3
3 186 38.7
Vascular access type AV fistula 395 82.1
AV graft 35 7.3
Permanent catheter 43 8.9
Temporary catheter 8 1.7
Duration of hemodialysis < 12 months 216 44.9
12–36 months 172 35.8
 37 months 93 19.3
Family history of CKD Yes 25 5.2
No 456 94.8
Medication adherence a Adhered 255 53.0
Not adhered 226 47.0
Anemia (serum hemoglobin < 12 g/dl) Yes 409 85.0
No 72 14.9
BMI Underweight 104 21.6
Normal weight 307 63.8
Overweight 57 11.9
Obese 13 2.7

CKD: chronic kidney disease, AV: Arterio-venous, BMI: body mass index

aSimplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire ≥ 12 = adherent, < 12 = non-adherent to medication

Behavioral factors

Regarding behavioral factors, 57 (11.9%), 74 (15.4%), and 145 (30.1%) of participants had ever smoked cigarettes, ever chewed khat, or ever consumed alcohol, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3.

Behavioral factors among patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (n = 481)

Variables Category Numbers (n) Percent (%)
Ever smoked cigarettes Yes 54 11.9
No 427 88.1
Current smoker Yes 2 3.6
No 52 96.4
Family member smokes cigarette Yes 44 9.1
No 437 90.9
Ever chewed khat Yes 74 15.4
No 407 84.6
Current chewer Yes 3 0.6
No 71 14.8
Ever consumed alcohol Yes 145 30.1
No 336 69.9
Alcohol consumption less than once a month Yes 3 0.6
No 8 1.7

Health-related quality of life

The mean scores of the five domains of the KDQOL-36 instrument ranged from 25.6 for the BKD scale to 66.68 for the SPKD scale (Table 4). Itchy skin (pruritus) was one of the most prevalent symptoms in our study (SPKD subscale), with 84% of patients reporting at least a moderate level followed by the symptoms “fainting or dizziness” (83.7%) and feeling “washed out or drained” (81%).

Table 4.

Mean scores of the domains of the KDQOL-36 rated by patients undergoing hemodialysis in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (n = 481)

Subscales Mean (SD) 95% CI
Symptom/problem list 66.68 (20.31) 64.72–68.43
Effects of kidney disease 51.93 (20.53) 50.11–53.80
Burden of kidney disease 25.60 (23.16) 23.55–27.81
SF-12 Physical Component Summary 35.45 (8.08) 34.76–36.17
SF-12 Mental Component Summary 37.48 (11.34) 36.49–38.54

CI, Confidence interval

Factors associated with health-related quality of life

This study found that higher age, female sex, a lack of formal education, poor medication adherence, hemodialysis sessions three times a week, lower BMI, longer duration of hemodialysis treatment (≥ 12 months), and poor social support were associated with poor HRQOL (Table 5) (Additional file 1). Accordingly, the coefficients of age in the physical component summary and effects of the kidney disease subscales were β = − 0.15 and − 0.17, respectively; indicating that a unit increase in age decreases the mean scores of the physical component summary and effects of kidney disease subscales by 0.15 and 0.17, respectively. Patients who had certificate-level and above education had higher PCS (better physical health) scores and rated their kidney disease burden as lower.

Table 5.

Socio-demographic characteristics associated with health-related quality of life domains among haemodialysis patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (n = 481)

Factors PCS
βa (95% CI)
MCS
βa (95%CI)
Symptoms
βa (95%CI)
Effects
βa (95%CI)
Burden
βa (95%CI)
Age -0.15 (-0.21– -0.09)* -0.001 (-0.1–0.08) -0.03 (-0.19–0.13) -0.21 (-0.37– -0.05)* 0.10 (-0.08–0.28)
Sex
Male Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
Female -0.29 (-1.89-1.29) -3.9(-6.26- -1.55)* -4.08(-8.26–0.09) -3.58(-7.73–0.57) -3.67(-9.50–2.20)
Educational status
No formal education Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
Primary school 0.58 (-2.12–3.29) 2.91 (-1.1–6.92) 1.48 (-5.6–8.57) 3.98 (-3.08–11.03) -0.51(-8.69–7.68)
Secondary school 1.30 (-0.93–3.54) 2.87 (-0.39–6.14) 3.46 (-2.38–9.3) 7.01(1.19–12.84)* 6.07 (0.57–12.72)
Certificate and above 3.0 (0.830–5.17)* 2.64 (-0.49–5.76) 4.59 (-1.07–10.25) 5.58 (-0.07–11.22) 8.05 (1.83–14.28)*
Marital status
Single Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
Ever married 0.05 (-1.89–2.00) -0.36 (-3.23–2.52) 3.32 (-8.6–1.95) -2.26 (-7.34–2.83) -3.85 (-9.70–2.01)
Family monthly income
6500 Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
> 6500 -0.49 (1.93–0.94) 0.26 (-1.85–2.36) 1.78 (-1.97–5.54) -1.13 (-4.87–2.59) -2.53 (-6.84–1.77)

*p-value < 0.05; Ref.: reference category; PCS: physical component summary; MCS: mental component summary score

Clinical characteristics associated with lower HRQOL in the EKD and SPKD subscales included longer duration of hemodialysis treatment (≥ 12 months, see Table 6) (Additional file 2). Moderate social support was strongly associated with better HRQOL in physical health domains. Adherence to subscribed medication was significantly associated with a higher HRQOL in the EKD domain. A significant negative association was found between the number of hemodialysis sessions (three times a week) and the physical health domain. A higher BMI ( 18.5) was strongly and consistently associated with better HRQOL across all domains. However, no statistically significant associations were found between HRQOL domains and behavioral factors, or the remaining socio-demographic and clinical variables.

Table 6.

Associations between clinical characteristics and social support, and health-related quality of life domains among patients undergoing haemodialysis in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (n = 481)

Factors PCS
βa (95% CI)
MCS
βa (95%CI)
Symptoms
βa (95%CI)
Effects
βa (95%CI)
Burden
βa (95%CI)
Comorbidities
Yes Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
No 0.84 (-1.83–3.51) -2.87 (-6.8–1.06) -0.22(-7.24–6.8) 3.35(-3.6–10.33) -6.21(-14.2–1.82)
Haemodialysis sessions per week
1–2 Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
3 -2.17(-3.64– -0.70)* 0.97(-1.18–3.12) 2.15(-1.65–5.95) -2.80(-6.59–0.98) -2.79(-7.18–1.60)
Duration of haemodialysis treatment
<12 months Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
12–36 months 0.47(-1.17–2.10) 0.13(-2.29–2.55) -5.79(-10.08– -1.49)* -5.65(-9.91– -1.38)* -9.08(-14.03– -4.13)
37 months -1.19(-3.144–0.76) -2.53(-5.42–0.37) -10.48(-15.6– -5.36)* -11.9(-16.9– -6.8)* -9.06(-14.97– -3.15)
Medication adherence
Adhered Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
Not adhered -0.99(-2.36–0.38) -0.91(-2.94–1.11) -3.56(-7.14-0.03) -4.6(-8.17– -1.03)* -1.78(-5.92–2.36)
BMI
Under weight Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
Normal weight 3.34(1.59–5.08)* 2.15(-0.43–4.73) 5.82(1.26–10.38) * 8.04(3.5–12.59)* 3.06(-2.22–8.34)
Overweight 3.51(0.96–6.07)* 3.45(-0.31–7.2) 4.64(-2.11–11.39) 7.78(1.11–14.44)* 2.43(-5.25–10.11)
Obese 0.07(4.39–4.53) 9.87(3.28–16.47)* 17.47(5.71–29.24)* 15.48(3.84–27.11)* 20.15(6.67–33.62)*
Social support
Poor Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
Moderate 1.84(0.24–3.43)* -0.67(-3.03–1.69) 0.62(-3.56–4.81) -0.58(-4.75–3.58) 0.15(-4.67–4.97)
Strong 1.68(-0.20–3.57) -3.67(-6.46–1.87) -3.76(-8.74–1.22) 2.67(-2.26–7.59) 4.09(-1.62–9.8)

*p-value < 0.05; Ref.: reference category; PCS: physical component summary; MCS: mental component summary score; BMI: body mass index; a Multivariable linear regression

Discussion

A multi-center institution-based cross-sectional study was carried out among patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis in both governmental and private hospitals/dialysis centers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The study demonstrated that patients undergoing hemodialysis rated their HRQOL as poor. Several socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of hemodialysis patients were found to be associated with both generic and kidney disease-related components of HRQOL.

The average age of the patients in our study (45 years) was broadly comparable to that of patients undergoing hemodialysis in other African countries [17, 32] and close to the mean age of patients in south-Asian countries [44, 45]. This could be explained by the fact that, in Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia, ESRD affects younger populations due to the influence of established risk factors, such as diabetes, hypertension and kidney infection [46, 47]. In support of this explanation, our data showed that 67% and 76% of diabetes and hypertensive patients, respectively, were younger than 60 years of age.

Our results showed that patients undergoing hemodialysis in Ethiopia struggle with poor physical and mental health (subscales PCS and MCS, respectively). This is in line with previous reports [3032, 34, 4850]; however, our mean scores (PCS and the MCS) were slightly lower than most other studies when taking the confidence intervals into account. A study from Malawi [32] with a small sample (n = 22) found higher scores of both PCS and MCS, and a single center study carried out in Colombia [30] reported higher ratings of PCS. Additionally, a large study from the US [25] reported better physical and mental health in a large sample of patients with all types of dialysis (in center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis, and nocturnal dialysis). Differences in sampling strategies, sample size, and response rates limit the possibility to conclude that our results are worse than previously reported. Our results underscore that this group of patients not only have serious limitations regarding physical health, but also mental health issues that merit concern.

Regarding the kidney disease-targeted part of the instrument, the BKD subscale was rated low, indicating that patients on maintenance hemodialysis experienced a huge disease burden. This finding is in line with two previous studies conducted in Ethiopia and Malawi but higher compared to a study performed in Kenya [49]. Our results were lower reflecting more frustration and interference, than those from the US, Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom), and Japan [25, 48] or those studies performed in Colombia and Egypt [30, 31]. A possible explanation of this discrepancy might be related to differences in healthcare systems. The healthcare system in Ethiopia requires lengthy procedures and numerous diagnostic tests, which may frustrate the patient. In addition, restrictions on mobility, daily activities, and the risk of losing one’s job due to dialysis therapy can result in a feeling of frustration and cause dialysis patients to perceive themselves to be a burden on their families. “Itchy skin (pruritus)”, “fainting or dizziness” and feeling “washed out or drained” were the most prevalent symptoms recorded in the SPKD subscale. These symptoms have been previously reported in systematic reviews [51, 52]. Additionally, in support of this observation, a US study reported the negative effects of pruritus on the HRQOL of patients on maintenance hemodialysis beyond the discomfort caused by the condition [53].

Patients’ ratings of effects of the disease, as measured with the subscale EKD, reached a similar level as a study performed in Colombia [30]. However, it is lower than the scores reported by other studies conducted in different parts of the world [31, 32, 34, 48, 54]. Hemodialysis patients must visit medical facilities three times a week for a total of three to five hours; this interferes with their ability to carry out their daily lives independently including work which may contribute to low HRQOL.

Our findings demonstrated that mean PCS and EKD scores decrease as age increases. This finding is supported by previous studies [27, 28, 31, 55] and may be explained by the reduced physical function, strength, energy and self-care ability of elderly patients that occurs with increased age. Complications including heart disease, anemia, high blood pressure, pulmonary edema, and decreased immune response that leads to infection, are also more likely to occur as age increases, which in turn increases pain and leads to further declines in energy and physical functioning [28]. Conversely, the shorter disease duration among younger patients might explain their higher HRQOL scores.

Female sex was associated with lower ratings of mental health (MCS), in line with previous reports [27, 28, 31]. This could be explained by the various roles women play in society that contribute to physical and mental stress, which have a significantly negative influence on the HRQOL of CKD patients [56]. This finding draws attention to the need to support women, who have more roles and responsibilities at home. Thus, a multidisciplinary team of nephrologists, nurses, social workers, and psychologists must work together to support patients undergoing hemodialysis; particularly women.

Consistent with previous studies [27, 28, 31], our data showed that participants with a higher educational levels scored their physical health (PCS) as better and perceived fewer burdens and effects of their kidney disease. This might be because higher education enhances individuals’ understanding of the value and importance of hemodialysis. In addition, higher educational levels are usually associated with higher income and the ability to afford treatment costs, which improves HRQOL.

Technically, patients’ HRQOL is supposed to improve with more frequent dialysis treatments; however, the opposite was found to be true in this study. This study demonstrated that attending hemodialysis sessions three times a week—which is the standard recommendation—was associated with poorer ratings of physical health (PCS subscale). A similar result was found in a Brazilian study [57], which found that attending hemodialysis sessions was associated with a higher prevalence of symptoms, worsening burdens of kidney disease, and lower PCS scores. Similarly, AlSalmi et al. reported that the HRQOL scores of hemodialysis patients decreased with increasing dialysis frequency [58]. This may be due to the patients’ health condition; severely ill patients may undergo hemodialysis three times a week.

The current study showed a positive relationship between adherence to medication and HRQOL with regard to the EKD subscale, consistent with previous findings [59]. This may indicate that non-adherence to medication prevents ESRD patients from gaining the full benefits of the prescribed medications, which has been associated with increased mortality and hospitalisation, leading to poorer HRQOL [60]. The health care team working in the dialysis unit should emphasise health education and counselling regarding medication adherence to improve patients’ HRQOL.

Social support plays a significant role in improving the HRQOL of hemodialysis patients. In line with other studies, we found that having social support was associated with better HRQOL regarding physical health [6163]. Dialysis treatment should consider the role of family members’, friends’, and neighbors’ participation by welcoming relatives and inviting family members to the dialysis unit. Additionally, due to the gaps they may fill in patients’ support requirements and the shared experiences of the group members, support groups that include patient’s relatives may prove helpful.

In the present study, normal or high BMI were associated with better HRQOL in all domains. About 20% of the respondents had a BMI > 24 kg/m2, which is the recommended BMI for hemodialysis patients [64]. Similarly, Kalantar-Zadeh et al. reported that a higher BMI was protective against cardiovascular disease among hemodialysis patients, in contrast to the general healthy population [65]. This may decrease the risk of having a cardiovascular comorbidity, which in turn contributes to better HRQOL for the patient. Healthcare professionals working in the dialysis unit should be aware of the recommended BMI for ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis and provide counselling, as needed, to help them maintain it.

The duration of hemodialysis treatment had a significant impact on patients’ HRQOL. According to this study, a duration of one year and above was associated with low SPKD and EKD scores, which is consistent with a previous study [66]. A similar observation was also made by a group in the US, who found that patients who had been on hemodialysis for a longer duration had lower functional status, more hospital readmissions, and worse HRQOL [56]. This is likely explained by the negative feelings brought by the lifelong nature of the treatment, monotonous living, feeling exhausted and fed up, and an inability to deal with the symptoms of dialysis [54]. Thus, as the duration of hemodialysis increases, patients will continue to experience these adverse effects, which may lower their HRQOL.

Strengths and limitations

The present study has several strengths. First, it assessed HRQOL using a standardized measure (KDQOL-36) that has been used extensively around the world and validated in Ethiopian patients with ESRD, allowing for comparisons with data from other settings. Second, to the best of our knowledge, this study had the largest sample size (481 participants) in sub-Saharan Africa, including both private and governmental facilities, where the cost of hemodialysis varies greatly. This study has limitations. As it is a cross-sectional study, causal inferences cannot be made between HRQOL and the independent variables. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews, which might have introduced interviewer and social desirability bias into the results. Another limitation could be the use of an already-changed terminology (“ESRD” changed to “kidney failure”) for the purpose of continuity with our previous work.

Conclusion

The results of the present study show that the HRQOL of hemodialysis patients in Ethiopia is low with regard to physical and mental health as well as kidney-related symptoms. Those reporting worse HRQOL were more likely female, older, lacked education, had poor medication adherence, underwent hemodialysis three times a week, had lower BMI, had undergone hemodialysis treatment for at least one year and had poor social support. The intricacies of hemodialysis therapy, as well as the wide range of factors that affect HRQOL, demand comprehensive multidisciplinary care. Therefore, development of clinical guidelines is recommended to improve patients’ adherence to their prescribed medications. Furthermore, establishing patient support groups and encouraging patients to use the available support resources from family members, neighbors, and friends have the potential to improve patients’ HRQOL. Continued research is recommended for a deeper understanding of how patients with ESRD in Ethiopia experience their treatment and life situation.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

12955_2023_2117_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16.4KB, docx)

Additional. file 1: Table 5. Additional. file 2: Table 6

Acknowledgements

We offer our heartfelt gratitude to the University of Gondar for providing financial support. Additionally, the authors would like to thank the respective hospitals and study participants.

List of abbreviations

BKD

Burden of kidney disease

EKD

Effect of kidney disease

ESRD

End-stage renal disease

HRQOL

Health-related quality of life

KDQOL-36

Kidney Disease Quality of Life − 36

MCS

Mental Component Summary

PCS

Physical Component Summary

SF-12

Short Form-12

UAE

United Arab Emirates

SPKD

Symptoms/problem lists of kidney disease

WHO

World Health Organisation

Biographies

Mignote Hailu Gebrie

is assistant professor of adult health nursing at the School of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Ethiopia. She has a Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) and a Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) in adult health nursing.

Hussen Mekonnen

is an associate professor of public health in the College of Health Sciences, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Department of Nursing, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Workagegnehu Hailu

is an associate professor of medicine in the department of Internal Medicine, University of Gondar, Ethiopia. He is an internist and nephrologist with over 10 years of experience in teaching, research and clinical practice.

Helena Lindgren

Helena Lindgren is a professor at the Sophiahemmet University and associated to Karolinska Institutet, Sweden. She is also a visiting professor at the University of Gondar, Ethiopia.

Lena Wettergren

Lena Wettergren is a professor at Uppsala University, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences and is associated to Karolinska Institutet, Sweden. She is also a visiting professor at the University of Gondar, Ethiopia.

Author’ contributions

MH together with LW conceived and planned the study. MH was the principal investigator of the project, who led the data collection, performed the statistical analyses and wrote the original draft of the manuscript. LW, HL, HM, and WH participated in the analysis phase and revised subsequent drafts of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the University of Gondar. The funder had no role in the design of the study, data collection, analysis, interpretation of the data or in writing the manuscript.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to disclose.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the University of Gondar and the City Government of Addis Ababa Health Bureau (reference numbers V/P/RCS/05/2271/2020 and A/A/H/5676/227, respectively) before the initiation of the study. Permission was obtained from each hospital administrative body. Written informed consent was collected from all participants. All potential participants were informed about the purpose, method and expected benefits of the study. The potential participants were informed that there were no financial rewards for participating in the research. They were informed of their full right to refuse to participate in this research without any effects on existing or future health care services. Confidentiality was maintained by ensuring anonymity and presenting the data on a group level.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all of the individual participants included in the study.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Mignote Hailu Gebrie, Email: elatman.hailu86@gmail.com.

Hussen Mekonnen Asfaw, Email: hussen_mk@yahoo.com.

Workagegnehu Hailu Bilchut, Email: workhailu@yahoo.com.

Helena Lindgren, Email: helena.lindgren@ki.se.

Lena Wettergren, Email: lena.wettergren@ki.se.

References

  • 1.Alebiosu OC, Ayodele OE. The global burden of chronic kidney disease and the way forward. Ethn Dis. 2005;15(3):418–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Liyanage T, Ninomiya T, Jha V, Neal B, Patrice HM, Okpechi I et al. Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: A systematic review. Lancet [Internet]. 2015;385(9981):1975–82. Available from: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61601-9 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Yeates K, Ghosh S, Kilonzo K. Developing nephrology programs in very low-resource settings: challenges in sustainability. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3(2):202–5. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2013.14. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Chronic Kidney Disease Evaluation, clasification and stratification [Internet] Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39:1–266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Levey AS, Eckardt KU, Dorman NM, Christiansen SL, Cheung M, Jadoul M et al. Nomenclature for kidney function and disease: executive summary and glossary from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) consensus conference. J Nephrol [Internet]. 2020;33(4):639–48. Available from: 10.1007/s40620-020-00773-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 6.Halle MP, Takongue C, Kengne AP, Kaze FF, Ngu KB. Epidemiological profile of patients with end stage renal disease in a referral hospital in Cameroon. BMC Nephrol. 2015;16(59):4–11. doi: 10.1186/s12882-015-0044-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Levin A, et al. Kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) CKD work group. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3(1):136–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Van Den Brand JAJG. Diabetes mellitus as a cause of end-stage renal disease in Europe: signs of improvement. Clin Kidney J. 2016;9(3):454–6. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfw029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Imig JD, Ryan MJ. Immune and inflammatory role in renal disease. Compr Physiol. 2013;3(2):957–76. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c120028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bikbov B, Purcell CA, Levey AS, Smith M, Abdoli A, Abebe M, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):709–33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30045-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schena FP. Epidemiology of end-stage renal disease: International comparisons of renal replacement therapy. Kidney Int [Internet]. 2000;57(Suppl.74):S39–45. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0085253815470395
  • 12.Arogundade FA, Omotoso BA, Adelakun A, Bamikefa T, Ezeugonwa R, Omosule B, et al. Burden of end-stage renal disease in sub-saharan Africa. Clin Nephrol. 2020;93(1):3–7. doi: 10.5414/CNP92S101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mactier R, Hoenich N, Breen C. Renal association clinical practice guideline on haemodialysis. Nephron - Clin Pract. 2011;118(SUPPL 1):241–87. doi: 10.1159/000328072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Barbosa JBN, Moura ECSC, Lira CLOBMP. Quality of life and duration of hemodialysis in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD): a cross-sectional study. Fisioter Mov. 2017;30(4):781–8. doi: 10.1590/1980-5918.030.004.ao13. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ayoub AM, Hijjazi KH. Quality of life in dialysis patients from the United Arab Emirates. J Fam Community Med. 2013;20(2):106–13. doi: 10.4103/2230-8229.114772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Abdel-Kader K, Unruh ML, Weisbord SD. Symptom burden, depression, and quality of life in chronic and end-stage kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4(6):1057–64. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00430109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kamal NN, Kamel EG, Eldessouki KH, Ahmed MG. Health-related quality of life among hemodialysis patients at El-Minia University Hospital, Egypt. J Public Heal. 2013;21(2):193–200. doi: 10.1007/s10389-012-0538-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fiseha T, Kassim MYT. Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease and Associated Risk Factors among Diabetic Patients in Southern Ethiopia. Am J Heal Res [Internet]. 2014;2(4):216–21. Available from: http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/journal/paperinfo.aspx?journalid=656&doi=10.11648/j.ajhr.20140204.28
  • 19.Yewondwossen Mengistu and Addisu Ejigu. Global Dialysis Perspective: Ethiopia. Kidney360. 2022;10.34067/KID.0006902021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Shibiru T, Gudina EK, Habte B, Derbew A, Agonafer T. Survival patterns of patients on maintenance hemodialysis for end stage renal disease in Ethiopia: summary of 91 cases. BMC Nephrol [Internet]. 2013;14(127). Available from: BMC Nephrology [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 21.Rawat KJ, Joshi KS, Arora RD. Quality of life in patients on hemodialysis: a quasi-experiment with review of literature. Int J Med Sci Public Heal. 2017;6(4):786–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Megari K. Quality of life in chronic disease patients.Heal Psychol Res. 2013;1(27). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 23.Kalantar-Zadeh K, Unruh M. Health related quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease. Int Urol Nephrol. 2005;37(2):367–78. doi: 10.1007/s11255-004-0012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ayanda KA, Abiodun OA, Ajiboye PO. Quality of life of chronic kidney disease patients in a nigerian teaching hospital. J Biol Agric Healthc [Internet] 2014;4(5):17–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fukuhara S, Lopes AA, Bragg-Gresham JL, Kurokawa K, Mapes DL, Akizawa T, et al. Health-related quality of life among dialysis patients on three continents: the Dialysis Outcomes and practice patterns study. Kidney Int. 2003;64(5):1903–10. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00289.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Thenmozhi P. Quality of life of patients undergoing hemodialysis. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2018;11(4):219–23. doi: 10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i4.24007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zyoud SH, Daraghmeh DN, Mezyed DO, Khdeir RL, Sawafta MN, Ayaseh NA et al. Factors affecting quality of life in patients on haemodialysis: a cross-sectional study from Palestine. BMC Nephrol [Internet]. 2016;17(44):1–12. Available from: 10.1186/s12882-016-0257-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 28.Zhou X, Xue F, Wang H, Aiao Y, Liu G, Huang L, Li D, Wang S, Wang Q, Li L, LR. &. The quality of life and associated factors in patients on maintenance hemodialysis – a multicenter study in Shanxi province. Ren Fail [Internet]. 2017;0(0):707–11. Available from: 10.1080/0886022X.2017.1398095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 29.Yang F, Griva K, Lau T, Vathsala A, Lee E, Ng HJ, et al. Health-related quality of life of asian patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Singapore. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(9):2163–71. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-0964-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Higuita-Gutierrez LFV-CJ. Health-Related Quality of Life in patients with chronic kidney disease in Hemodialysis in Medellín (Colombia) Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019;2019(13):2061–70. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S229670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wassef OM, El–Gendy MF, El–Anwar RM, ES& HB Assessment of health-related quality of life of hemodialysis patients in Benha City, Qalyubia Governorate. Menoufia Med J. 2019;31(1):1414–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Masina T, Chimera B, Kamponda M, Dreyer G. Health related quality of life in patients with end stage kidney disease treated with haemodialysis in Malawi: a cross sectional study. BMC Nephrol [Internet]. 2016;17(61):4–11. Available from: 10.1186/s12882-016-0292-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 33.Kane Y, Biao Hermann B, Faye M, Hamat I, Lemrabott AT, Faye M, et al. Quality of life in Chronic Hemodialysed Patients: Observational Study in three hemodialysis units in semi-urban areas of Senegal (West Africa) J Clin Nephrol Ren Care. 2019;5(2):1–6. doi: 10.23937/2572-3286.1510045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kim S, Nigatu Y, Araya T, Assefa Z, Dereje N. Health related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) on hemodialysis in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol. 2021;22(1):1–6. doi: 10.1186/s12882-021-02494-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kefale B, Alebachew M, Tadesse Y, Engidawork E. Quality of life and its predictors among patients with chronic kidney disease: a hospital-based cross sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(2):1–16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Berhe T, Tsighe A, November BA. 2019 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Addis Ababa Univ institutional Repos. 2019
  • 37.Hays ARD, Kallich JD, Mapes DL, Coons SJ, Carter WB. Development of the kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOLTM) Instrument. Qual Life Res. 2018;3(5):329–38. doi: 10.1007/BF00451725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hays RD, Kallich JD, Mapes DL, Coons SJ, Amin N, CW& KC. Kidney diseaase quality of Life Short Form (KDQOL-SF), version 1.3: a Manual for Use and Scoring. RAND; 1997.
  • 39.Gebrie MH, Asfaw HM, Bilchut WH, Lindgren H, Wettergren L. Psychometric properties of the kidney disease quality of life-36 (KDQOL-36) in Ethiopian patients undergoing hemodialysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes [Internet]. 2022;20(1):1–9. Available from: 10.1186/s12955-022-01932-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 40.Al Matari RA, Maneno MK, Daftary MN, Wingate LMEE. Development and validation of Amharic Version of the simplified medication adherence questionnaire among literate Amharic speaking persons an urban Teaching Hospital in Washington DC Region. Int J Case Reports Short Rev. 2019;5(1):1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kocalevent R, Berg L, Beutel ME, Hinz A, Zenger M, Härter M. Social support in the general population: standardization of the Oslo social support scale (OSSS-3) BMC Psychol. 2018;6(31):4–11. doi: 10.1186/s40359-018-0249-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bøen et al. The importance of social support in the associations between psychological distress and somatic health problems and socio-economic factors among older adults living at home: a cross sectional study. BMC Geriatr 2012, [Internet]. 2012;12(27). Available from: ??? [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 43.Stata Corp. StataSE. College Station. TX: Stata Corp LP.; 2017.
  • 44.Butt MD, Ong SC, Butt FZ, Sajjad A, Rasool MF, Imran I, et al. Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life, Medication Adherence, and prevalence of depression in kidney failure patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(22):15266. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yapa HE, Purtell L, Chambers S. Alterations in symptoms and health-related quality of life as kidney function deteriorates: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Nurs. 2021;30(11–12):1787–96. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Krzesinski JM, Sumaili KE, Cohen E. How to tackle the avalanche of chronic kidney disease in sub-saharan Africa: the situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo as an example. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22(2):332–5. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Arogundade FA, Barsoum RS. CKD Prevention in Sub-Saharan Africa: a call for Governmental, nongovernmental, and Community Support. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;51(3):515–23. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cohen DE, Lee A, Sibbel S, Benner D, Brunelli SM, Tentori F. Use of the KDQOL-36™ for assessment of health-related quality of life among dialysis patients in the United States (BMC Nephrology (2019) 20:1 (112) DOI: 10.1186/s12882-019-1295-0). BMC Nephrol. 2019;20(112):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 49.Kamau E, Kayima J, Otieno C. Health related quality of life of patients on maintenance haemodialysis at kenyatta national hospital.East Afr Med J. 2014;91(10). [PubMed]
  • 50.Yusop NB, Mun CY, Shariff ZM, Huat C. Factors Associated with Quality of Life among Hemodialysis Patients in Malaysia. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12):1–11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Almutary H, Bonner A, Douglas C. Symptom burden in chronic kidney disease: a review of recent literature. J Ren Care. 2013;39(3):140–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6686.2013.12022.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yapa HE, Purtell L, Chambers S, Bonner A. The Relationship Between Chronic Kidney Disease, Symptoms and Health-Related Quality of Life: A Systematic Review. J Ren Care [Internet]. 2020;46(2):74–84. Available from: 10.1111/jorc.12303 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 53.Ramakrishnan K, Bond TC, Claxton A, Sood VC, Kootsikas M, Agnese W, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of end-stage renal disease patients with self-reported pruritus symptoms. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2013;7:1–12. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S52985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mollaoğlu M, Deveci G. Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Renal Failure and Some Affecting Factors.Arch Ren Dis Mana. 2017;3(1).
  • 55.Yapa HE, Purtell L, Chambers S, Bonner A. Factors influencing health-related quality of life in people with chronic kidney disease: A structural equation modelling approach.Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2022. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 56.Weisbord SD. Patient-centered Dialysis Care: Depression, Pain, and Quality of Life. Semin Dial. 2016;29(2):158–64. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Pereira CV, Leite ICG. Health-related quality of life of patients receiving hemodialysis therapy. ACTA Paul Enferm. 2019;32(3):267–74. doi: 10.1590/1982-0194201900037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Al Salmi I, Kamble P, Lazarus ER, D’Souza MS, Al Maimani Y, Hannawi S. Kidney Disease-Specific Quality of Life among Patients on Hemodialysis. Int J Nephrol. 2021;2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 59.Nabolsi MM, Wardam L. & A-HJ. Quality of life, depression, adherence to treatment and illness perception of patients on haemodialysis.Int J ofNursing Pract. 2013 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 60.Ghimire S, Castelino RL, Lioufas NM, Peterson GM. Nonadherence to Medication Therapy in Haemodialysis Patients: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(12):1–19. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Alexopoulou M, Giannakopoulou N, Komna E, Alikari V, Polikandrioti M. The effect of percieved social support on hemodialysis patients’ quality of life. Mater Sociomed. 2016;28(August):338–42. doi: 10.5455/msm.2016.28.338-342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Alshraifeen A, Al-Rawashdeh S, Alnuaimi K, Alzoubi F, Tanash M, Ashour A, et al. Social support predicted quality of life in people receiving haemodialysis treatment: a cross-sectional survey. Nurs Open. 2020;7(5):1517–25. doi: 10.1002/nop2.533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jung HM, Kim HY. A health-related quality of life model for patients undergoing haemodialysis. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(3–4):613–25. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Medical Nutrition Therapy. Medical nutrition therapy guidelines for chronic kidney disease [Internet]. Malaysian Dietitians’ Association. 2005. p. 1–56. Available from: http://dietitians.org.my/for-members/resources-for-practice/guidelines-for-dietetic-practice
  • 65.Kalantar-Zadeh K, Ikizler TA, Block G, Avram MM, Kopple JD. Malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome in Dialysis Patients: causes and consequences. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42(5):864–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajkd.2003.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Anees M, Hameed F, Mumtaz A, Ibrahim M, Khan MNS. Dialysis-related factors affecting quality of life in patients on hemodialysis. Iran J Kidney Dis. 2011;5(1):9–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

12955_2023_2117_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16.4KB, docx)

Additional. file 1: Table 5. Additional. file 2: Table 6

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES