Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb;52(2):254–264. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i2.11879

Table 3:

Summary of demographic information of studies

Author/Year Purpose Task Results
Messier et al. 1990 (38) Relationships exist between selected biomechanical factors runners with PFP and healthy individuals Running The PFP group demonstrated that Fz1 were decreased and no significant difference was observed in the Fz2
Radin et al. 1991 (23) The kinematic and kinetic examined the behavior of the legs of young adult with PFP patients Walking The Fz1 and Fz2 tended to decreased and increased in PFP patients, respectively
Powers et al. 1999 (20) The determine if PFP patients demonstrate excessive lower limb loading Walking The Fz1 for the PFP group was decreased during both free and fast walking
Duffey et al. 2000 (37) The examine differences between a non-injured and runners with PFP according to selected training, anthropometric, rear foot motion and GRF Running The PFP group demonstrated that Fz1 were decreased. No significant difference was observed in the Fz2 but was a tendency toward decreased in PFP group
Levinger et al. 2007 (36) The measure rear foot and tibia motion and GRF in PFP patients compare to healthy individuals Walking There was no significant difference in the Fz1 and Fz2; but there is a tendency to decrease both peak forces in PFP patients.
Paoloni et al. 2010 (11) The investigate Kinematic and kinetic features of normal level walking in PFP patients Walking There was no significant difference in the Fz1 but there is a tendency to force decrease in PFP patients
Saad et al. 2011 (15) Evaluate the displacement area of the center of pressure, GRF in PFP patients compared to healthy individuals Step up and step down The PFP group show a Fz1 decrease in affected leg than not affected leg during the step-down activity, and Fz2 was increased in the step-up and decrease in the step down
Silva et al. 2015 (10) The investigate differences in Fz1 and Fz2 between recreational female athletes with PFP and pain-free Stair up The PFP group demonstrated that Fz1 were decrease. No significant difference was observed in the Fz2
Esculier et al. 2015 (35) The compare GRF during treadmill running in recreational runners with and without PFP Running Fz1 have a tendency toward decreased in PFP group

Abbreviations: PFP: patellofemoral pain, Fz1: impact/passive peak, Fz2: propulsive/active peak, GRF: Ground reaction force