Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 13;52(2):577–588. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac142

Table 3.

Associations of behavioural patterns with adiposity at 6–8 years

Method Behaviour pattern groups (CA/LPA)/scores (PCA)b BMI z-score
Waist circumference
β (95% CI) P-value β (95% CI) P-value
CAa Active healthy eaters pattern group vs unhealthy pattern group −0.07 (−0.36, 0.22) 0.64 −0.08 (−0.39, 0.23)
0.61
Active sleepers, non-sedentary, unhealthy eaters pattern group vs unhealthy pattern group −0.12 (−0.34, 0.11) 0.30 −0.20 (−0.48, 0.08)
0.16
Active healthy eaters pattern group vs active, sleepers, non-sedentary, unhealthy eaters pattern group −0.05 (−0.25, 0.15) 0.63 −0.12 (−0.36, 0.12)
0.32
LPAa Active healthy eaters pattern group vs unhealthy pattern group −0.05 (−0.28, 0.18) 0.70 0.00 (−0.24, 0.25)
0.97
Active, non-sedentary, unhealthy eaters pattern group vs unhealthy pattern group 0.04 (−0.17, 0.25) 0.70 −0.00 (−0.24, 0.23)
0.97
Active healthy eaters pattern group vs active non-sedentary, unhealthy eaters pattern group 0.09 (−0.15, 0.32) 0.47 −0.01 (−0.26, 0.24)
0.95
PCAb ‘Mixed’ active, high sleep, non-sedentary, unhealthy eating pattern score −0.01 (−0.08, 0.06) 0.73 −0.04 (−0.13, 0.05)
0.38
‘Healthy’, active healthy eating pattern score 0.02 (−0.05, 0.09) 0.56 0.06 (−0.02, 0.13)
0.14
‘Unhealthy’, low sleep, sedentary, high snacks pattern score 0.09 (0.02, 0.16) 0.015 0.07 (0.01, 0.14)
0.028
‘Mixed’ inactive, sedentary, high sleep pattern score −0.10 (−0.19, −0.02) 0.021 −0.03 (−0.13, 0.07)
0.53

BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CA, cluster analysis; LPA, latent profile analysis; PCA, principal component analysis.

Bold values indicate significant P-values.

a

Pairwise comparisons for patterns derived using CA and LPA.

b

Patterns identified by PCA comprise behavioural scores for all sample members, patterns from CA and LPA comprise groups of individuals.