Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 20;29(2):185–191. doi: 10.1177/02601060221132922

Table 2.

Intervention studies on protein intake and testosterone. a

Study Study type Sample size Duration of diet 1 (days) Macronutrients, % of TEI (protein/fat/carbohydrate) Protein intake (g/kg/day) Change in total testosterone (diet 1 vs. 2) b
Diet 1 Diet 2 Diet 1 Diet 2 nmol/L %
Anderson et al., 1987 Crossover 7 10 44/21/35 10/20/70 3.9 0.9 −3.36 −20.7
Jaffe, 2013 Crossover 10 7 55/39/7 25/20/55 3.7 1.8 −14.46 −29.8
Langfort et al., 2001 Crossover 9 3 45/50/5 20/30/50 3.5 1.6 −3.44 −15.5
Michalczyk et al., 2019 Crossover 15 28 31/59/10 15/31/54 3.2 1.5 + 3.32 + 17.5
Toma, 2009 Parallel 17 49 30/39/31 14/25/58 2.6 1.1 −4.23 −19.4
Pourabbas et al., 2021 c Parallel 30 42 25/30/45 17/32/50 2.3 1.4 + 0.49 + 1.6
Volek et al., 2002 Parallel 20 42 30/61/8 16/26/58 2.2 0.9 −0.2 −1
Tsai et al., 1993 d Crossover 4 3 25/60/15 15/30/55 2.2 1.3 + 3.2 + 14.2
Hoffman et al., 2007 c Parallel 21 84 25/30/46 15/29/56 2 1.2 −0.73 −2.6
Haun et al., 2018 c , e Parallel 32 84 24/35/41 16/35/50 1.8 1.3 + 5.48 + 25.4

g/kg/day: g/kg of bodyweight/day; TEI: total energy intake.

a

Diets one and two were isocaloric, defined as within 10% of the total energy intake of each other, taking into account differences in energy intake requirements between groups. All samples were healthy, non-obese, young to middle-aged men.

b

Change from baseline scores used where possible, and in these studies, the percentage change in testosterone was calculated using the starting value for diet one (Haun et al., 2018; Hoffman et al., 2007; Jaffe, 2013; Pourabbas et al., 2021; Toma, 2009; Volek et al., 2002).

c

These studies used a protein vs carbohydrate supplement intervention, to increase protein intake. The unmarked studies used a higher protein diet; although often including protein supplements as well.

d

‘F’ and ‘CHO’ diets were used.

e

‘PLA’ and ‘WPC’ diets were used.