Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 4;35(3):275–281. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.02.003

Table 4.

Distribution of reasons for restorations replacement on associated factors.

N = 318 Amalgam
Composite
n = 261 (82%)
n = 57 (18%)
AOR
PI
OR
AOR
PI
OR
greater than10 poor bruxism greater than10 poor bruxism
Secondary caries 29 30 5 9
Fracture (tooth/restoration) 28 4 5 1 2
Ditching/marginal discoloration 25 11 7 6
Proximal overhang/open contact 4 7 3 1
Loss of anatomy 2 2 1 1
Pain/sensitivity 10 4 1
Aesthetics 49 18 3 5
Total 147 74 10 18 21 3
56% 28% 4% 32% 37% 5%