Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 17;220(7):e20210567. doi: 10.1084/jem.20210567

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

B. abortus induces PU.1 upregulation in an Omp25/CD150-dependent manner. (a) Experimental scheme: Pu.1+/GFP and CD150−/− Pu.1+/GFP mice were intraperitoneally injected with PBS (Mock, unfilled circle) or inoculated with 1 × 106 CFU of Ba WT (black square), Ba ∆omp25 (gray square). 2 d later, the percentage of GFP expression in HSC (lin, Sca+, cKit+, CD48, CD135 CD34) was assessed by flow cytometry. (b) GFP expression in BM HSC (lin, Sca+, cKit+, CD48, CD135, CD34) assessed by flow cytometry at day 2 after infection. Data (b) were obtained from distinct samples (from left to right, n = 5, 10, 5, 5, 6) from three independent experiments. Mean ± SD is represented by a horizontal bar. Significant differences from mock are shown. ***, P < 0.001; * P < 0.05. Absence of P value or ns, non-significant. Since data did not follow a normal distribution, P values were generated using Kruskal–Wallis followed by Dunn’s test. (c) Experimental scheme: HSC (lin, Sca+, cKit+, CD48, CD135, CD34) from Pu.1+/GFP or CD150−/− Pu.1+/GFP mice were sorted, then stimulated ex vivo with PBS or B. abortus WT OMVs, B. abortusomp25 OMVs. After 16 h, the level of GFP in cells was assessed by flow cytometry. (d) Percentage of GFP + HSC 16 h after ex vivo stimulation with B. abortus WT OMV (black square), B. abortusomp25 OMV (gray square) compared to mock (Mock, unfilled circle) assessed by flow cytometry (from left to right: n = 6, 6, 6, 5, 5). (e) Percentage of GFP+ HSC assessed by flow cytometry 0 h (Mock, unfilled circle, n = 4) or 16 h after ex vivo stimulation with B. abortus WT (black square, n = 4), B. abortus WT OMV and the control peptide (100 µg/ml; black square, n = 2), and blocking peptide of CD150 (100 µg/ml; gray square, n = 2). Data (d and e) were obtained from HSC of a pool of three to four mice, and the pool of cells has been divided by the number of tested conditions. Each dot is a replicative experiment. Mean ± SD is represented by a horizontal bar. Significant differences from mock are shown. **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05. P values were generated using Mann–Whitney test.