Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 17;29(4):950–962. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02268-w

Extended Data Fig. 2. Two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis between putative risk factors and extensive PVS burden.

Extended Data Fig. 2

Two-sample Mendelian randomization was conducted using European PVS GWAS summary statistics (N = 38,598 (WM-PVS), N = 38,903 (BG-PVS) and N = 38,871 (HIP-PVS)), combined with summary statistics for lacunes (N = 1,715 cases / N = 15,096 controls) and WMH volume (N = 48,454) in MTAG, for the outcomes and European GWAS summary statistics for blood pressure traits (N = 757,601) to generate instruments for exposures (Supplementary Tables 1 and 29). Only significant associations after multiple testing correction (p < 1.19×10−3) in GSMR are shown. Each dot (or triangle if p < 1.19×10−3) represents the beta estimate from Mendelian randomization with lines representing the 95% confidence interval. Two-sided p-values of GSMR are reported. PVS indicates perivascular spaces; WM, white matter; BG, basal ganglia; HIP, hippocampus; MTAG, multi-trait analysis of genome-wide association summary statistics; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; PP, pulse pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; NS, not significant; GSMR, Generalised Summary-data-based Mendelian Randomisation; IVW, Inverse variance weighted; 2SMR, Two-SampleMR.