Abstract
Nipah virus (NiV) is a zoonotic virus that can pose a serious threat to human and livestock health. Old-world fruit bats (Pteropus spp.) are the natural reservoir hosts for NiV, and Pteropus lylei, Lyle’s flying fox, is an important host of NiV in mainland Southeast Asia. NiV can be transmitted from bats to humans directly via bat-contaminated foods (i.e., date palm sap or fruit) or indirectly via livestock or other intermediate animal hosts. Here we construct risk maps for NiV spillover and transmission by combining ecological niche models for the P. lylei bat reservoir with other spatial data related to direct or indirect NiV transmission (livestock density, foodborne sources including fruit production, and human population). We predict the current and future (2050 and 2070) distribution of P. lylei across Thailand, Cambodia, and Vietnam. Our best-fit model predicted that central and western regions of Thailand and small areas in Cambodia are currently the most suitable habitats for P. lylei. However, due to climate change, the species range is predicted to expand to include lower northern, northeastern, eastern, and upper southern Thailand and almost all of Cambodia and lower southern Vietnam. This expansion will create additional risk areas for human infection from P. lylei in Thailand. Our combined predictive risk maps showed that central Thailand, inhabited by 2.3 million people, is considered highly suitable for the zoonotic transmission of NiV from P. lylei. These current and future NiV transmission risk maps can be used to prioritize sites for active virus surveillance and developing awareness and prevention programs to reduce the risk of NiV spillover and spread in Thailand.
Keywords: Climate change, Ecological niche model, Emerging infectious disease, Lyle’s flying fox, Pteropuslylei
Introduction
Nipah virus (NiV) encephalitis is an emerging infectious disease that is a significant threat to public health in the Asia–Pacific region, including countries where the virus has already emerged and infected people: Bangladesh, India, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Singapore (Ang et al., 2018; Ambat et al., 2019; Sharma et al., 2019; Hauser et al., 2021). NiV diversity in bats and human is split between two genetic clades the Malaysia (NiV-MY) and Bangladesh (NiV-BD) strains (Rota and Lo 2012), and these strains exhibit potential differences in pathogenicity (DeBuysscher et al. 2013). There have been more than 634 cases of NiV reported in people from 1998 to 2021 (Skowron et al. 2022), including some short chains of human-to-human infection following spillover. NiV-MY was first discovered as an outbreak in pigs and humans in peninsular Malaysia and Singapore in 1998–1999. The virus caused encephalitis, with a 39% fatality rate among human cases in Malaysia (Chua 2003). Since 2001, in western and northwestern Bangladesh and the area bordering India, NiV-BD transmission from bats to humans has frequently been reported; limited chains of subsequent human-to-human transmission have been observed (Luby et al. 2009b). NiV-BD outbreaks are associated with significantly higher case fatality rates (43–100%) than are NiV-MY outbreaks (Hsu et al. 2004; Chadha et al. 2006; Gurley et al. 2007).
Fruit bats of the genus Pteropus have been identified as a natural reservoir of NiV-MY and NiV-BD, and in Thailand, Pteropus lylei (Lyle’s flying fox) serves as the primary natural NiV host (Wacharapluesadee et al. 2005; 2013; 2016). P. lylei is a member of the fruit bat family (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae); it is found in Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam (Bumrungsri et al. 2008; IUCN 2021). P. lylei is known to occur in lower central, western, and eastern Thailand, and about 30 roosting sites have been surveyed with a total population of 75,016 (Chaiyes et al. 2017). In Thailand and Cambodia, P. lylei travels distances of 2–23 and 6.88–105 km, respectively, from day roosts to foraging areas (Weber et al. 2015; Choden et al. 2019). P. lylei is an important reservoir of NiV, particularly in Thailand and Cambodia (Reynes et al. 2005; Wacharapluesadee et al. 2005; 2010). Wacharapluesadee et al. (2010), reporting on the prevalence of NiV among P. lylei in Thailand, found a seasonal pattern of viral shedding in seven of 30 bat roosting sites, and evidence of both the NiV-MY and NiV-BD strains present. All NiV surveillance sites (Wacharapluesadee et al. 2010), representing 36% of the total bat population in Thailand, were located within Buddhist temples found near densely residential areas (Chaiyes et al. 2017; Duengkae et al. 2019).
Spatial modeling approaches and risk mapping can be a valuable tools to predict zoonotic disease transmission (Ostfeld et al. 2005) and determine the distribution of suitable habitats for host reservoirs (Hahn et al. 2014a). Ecological niche modeling (ENM) approaches establish a relationship between occurrence records and environmental variables and can be used to predict the habitat suitability for a target species or vector (Peterson 2006; 2014; Peterson et al. 2011). ENM is a theoretical framework that considers biotic interactions (B), environmental conditions (A), and mobility (M) to understand species distributions (i.e., the BAM diagram; Soberón and Peterson 2005). ENM has been used to produce risk maps of potential NiV transmission to humans by Daszak et al. (2013), Hahn et al. (2014b), Peterson (2015), Walsh (2015), and Deka and Morshed (2018). However, previous research involving the mapping of NiV transmission from P. lylei has been based on expert opinions comprising a potential surface analysis approach in Thailand (Thanapongtharm et al. 2015). A more complete picture of the entire extent of P. lylei distribution and ecological requirements is needed to assess the pathways to zoonotic spillover, thus substantially improving the ability to predict or prevent spillover events (Plowright et al. 2017).
Thailand has a confluence of potential risk factors for NiV disease outbreaks to occur as NiV has relatively high prevalence in P. lylei, and the NiV-BD is dominant and is known to directly transmit to humans (Wacharapluesadee et al. 2021). Almost all of the known P. lylei populations are found in close proximity to human communities including highly urban areas like Bangkok (Chaiyes et al. 2017), and there is an abundance of pig and livestock farming in the foraging zone of P. lylei. In addition to direct transmission from flying foxes to humans, NiV transmission from flying foxes to livestock or via foodborne sources is also possible.
Livestock or foodborne infection of NiV to humans has occurred on multiple occasions (Luby et al. 2006, 2009a; Chattu et al. 2018). Thus, NiV transmission from flying foxes to humans is clearly possible in Thailand and understanding this risk requires improved models to evaluate spatial risk of spillover via different mechanisms and transmission routes.
Here we construct improved risk maps for NiV spillover and transmission for a critical, populated areas of mainland Southeast Asia. Our study has two primary objectives: (1) to evaluated the ecological niche of NiV based on the P. lylei reservoir host occurrence across Thailand, Cambodia, and Vietnam; (2) to quantify possible spatial risk zones of NiV transmission in Thailand via exposure routes from (i) bats to livestock to humans, (ii) bats to humans via indirect foodborne transmission, and (iii) directly from bats to humans.
Methods
Study Area
Models were run across two different scales, regionally (including the entire spatial distribution of P. lylei) and only within Thailand. First, a niche model for P. lylei was trained using data from an area encompassing Thailand and Cambodia, approximately 159,200 km2 (8–16°N, 98–108°E), to include the potential range of climatic conditions under which the species occurs (Fig. 1). Second, for NiV, risk was mapped in an area of approximately 97,759 km2 (10–15°N, 98–103°E), including 25 provinces in the western, central (including the capital and largest city, Bangkok), and eastern regions of Thailand (approximately 20% of Thailand’s total land area).
Figure 1.
Locations of Pteropus lylei roosting sites used to fit the model.
Reservoir Host Occurrence Data
We obtained 48 occurrence records corresponding to all known roosting sites of P. lylei (Supplementary Table 1). Thirty locations were from Thailand (Chaiyes et al. 2017), 14 locations were from Cambodia, and four locations were from Vietnam (Ravon et al. 2014; Chaiyes et al. 2020). The occurrence records were filtered to reduce the effects of sampling biases, enabling better estimation of niche characteristics (Fourcade et al. 2014). To reduce the inherent geographic biases associated with collection data, we removed occurrence data that were within 10 km of each other (Boria et al. 2014). We used the Geographic Distance Matrix Generator version 1.2.3 to calculate the geographic distance between each pair of occurrence data points (Ersts, 2021). For each cluster of occurrence records less than 10 km apart, we determined the minimum number of records that could be retained. There were 33 occurrence records after filtering; these were used to analyze the ecological niche model (see Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 1). We randomly split the occurrence dataset into two subsets, with 75% used for calibration and 25% used for evaluation during model calibration (Fig. 1).
Environmental Data
We used global bioclimatic variables from the WorldClim2 (Fick and Hijmans, 2017) dataset with the same spatial resolution (approximately 1 km2) in GeoTiff format (Supplementary Table 2) for the ecological niche of P. lylei. The bioclimatic variables represented current climates (averaged for 1950–2000), and estimates for the two future time periods of 2050 and 2070 were used as transfer layers. Future scenario layers were obtained for the representative concentration pathway (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios using CMIP5 general circulation models (MPI-ESM-LR). The performance and suitability of these modeled data across Southeast Asia regions has been previously evaluated (McSweeney et al. 2015). We excluded four data layers with artifactual values that were expressed as abrupt and unrealistic climatic changes between neighboring pixels (i.e., 8, 9, 18, and 19: Escobar et al. 2014).
Ecological Niche Modeling
To model the ecological niche of P. lylei, we used the maximum entropy algorithm (Maxent; Phillips et al. 2006) using Maxent 3.4.1 software (Phillips et al. 2018). The kuenm package (Cobos et al. 2019) in R 3.5.1 (R Core Team 2018) was used to select the model used to estimate the ecological niche at a regional scale.
Model Calibration
To obtain an acceptable model performance, model calibration areas should encompass the areas into which species can disperse (i.e., areas that can be colonized by a species or that are accessible to a species for periodic movement) (M: Soberón and Peterson 2005; Barve et al. 2011). We calibrated an ecological niche model based on species access via their dispersal potential, M (Poo-Muñoz et al. 2014; Cooper and Soberón 2018). We delineated M as the average distance between the recorded occurrences of P. lylei and generated a buffer of 870 km around known P. lylei occurrences in Thailand, Cambodia, and Vietnam (Fig. 1). Then, we clipped 15 bioclimatic variables of the current and future climate were clipped to the corresponding extent of M.
In total, 527 candidate models were built under 29 combinations of linear, quadratic, product, threshold, and hinge response types, with 17 regularization multiplier values (0.1, 0.2, 0.3…1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 10). The evaluated candidate model performance was based on the significance of a partial receiver operating characteristic (ROC) with 500 iterations; 50% of the data were used for bootstrapping (Peterson et al. 2008). A 5% training presence threshold was used to evaluate omissions (Peterson et al. 2011), and the Akaike information criterion corrected for small sample sizes (AICc) was used to evaluate model complexity (Hurvich and Tsai 1989). The selected models from among those determined to be significant were low-omission candidate models with minimum delta AICc units (see the complete detail of model evaluation results in Supplementary Table 3 and Supplementary Material 2).
Final Models
We created the final models using the selected parameter settings and model performance. The models were then applied to Thailand, Cambodia, and Vietnam; the extent of M was considered under current conditions and based on the two future climate scenarios of 2050 and 2070. The mobility-oriented parity metric (MOP) was used to analyze the degree of novelty of climate conditions under all future climate scenarios (2 RCPs × 2 time periods) relative to present-day conditions in the calibration area as per Owens et al. (2013).
Mapping Potential NiV Spillover Risk Areas Based on Host Distribution and Various Transmission Pathways
We developed specific spatial models based on NiV transmission risk factors (i.e., P. lylei, presence, spillover via livestock, spillover via foodborne sources like fruit orchards, and human population density) to broadly assess the potential risk of NiV transmission. Data regarding the four NiV transmission factors were obtained as follows:
P. lylei: P. lylei is strongly associated with the occurrence of NiV because the species is a key reservoir for the virus (Reynes et al. 2005; Wacharapluesadee et al. 2005; 2010; 2021). Ecological niche models have been widely used to describe the geography of disease transmission risk (Peterson 2014). The suitability of reservoir host habitats was used as a predictor of NiV risk (Hahn et al. 2014b; Walsh 2015).
Livestock: Direct contact with infected livestock (pigs, goats, and cattle) has been identified as an important mode of NiV transmission to humans (Luby et al. 2009a). Pigs specifically have served as an amplifying host in the initial emergence of NiV in Malaysia (CDC, 1999; Chua et al. 1999; Mohd Nor et al. 2000). Other data from Bangladesh suggest that other livestock species (cattle and goats) were also previously infected with NiV (Chowdhury et al. 2014). In the Philippines, horses were the intermediate reservoir for human NiV infection (Ching et al. 2014). Therefore, we used livestock data (e.g., pigs, cattle, and horse farm boundaries and locations from the land use types of each sub district), which were provided in vector format by the Thailand Land Development Department in 2016 (Supplementary Fig. 1A).
Foodborne sources: It is likely that humans have been infected via consumption of fruit contaminated with bat saliva (Luby et al. 2006; Chattu et al. 2018). The survival time of NiV in fruit pulp and fruit juices varies depending on the type of fruit and its pH (Fogarty et al. 2008). We used data from a detailed study mapping the foraging patterns of P. lylei in Thailand, and included spatial layers for 11 of the 34 most common plant species (Weber et al. 2015). The 11 types of P. lylei food provided a foodborne transfer route for NiV from P. lylei to humans; the food data were classified by the Thailand Land Development Department in 2016 (Supplementary Fig. 1B). Mango (Mangifera indica), banana (Musa sp.), tamarind (Tamarindus indica), earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), cashew (Anacardium occidentale), eucalyptus (Eucalyptus sp.), sapodilla (Manilkara zapota), Manila tamarind (Pithecellobium dulce), common guava (Psidium guajava), santol (Sandoricum koetjape), and Malabar plum (Syzygium jambos) were used as food by P. lylei, including the fruits, leaves, and flowers of these plants (Supplementary Fig. 1B).
Humans: Human population density and village locations have been associated with NiV spillover risk (Hahn et al. 2014a; b). We used village boundaries provided in vector format by the Thailand Land Development Department in 2016 (Supplementary Fig. 1C). The human density map in these 1 × 1-km pixels in 2018 was calculated using data from the National Statistical Office of Thailand (Supplementary Fig. 1C).
Risk maps for potential zoonotic spillover of NiV from P. lylei were created by overlapping human population density (people per km2) with the suitability of reservoir hosts and the spatial distribution of various transmission pathways of NiV (Fig. 2). First, we developed current suitability maps for the P. lylei reservoir host across Thailand, Cambodia, and Vietnam based on the ecological niche model (see the ENM section above). We then used the boundary of Thailand to mask the potential present suitability of P. lylei. This surface showed the areas suitable for P. lylei reservoir host occupancy, which was used as a predictor of NiV risk. The potential NiV risk in Thailand was reclassified into three categories (low, medium, and high) to represent the different levels of risk using the Jenks natural breaks classification method, with classes based on natural groupings inherent in the values of the data (Jenks 1967). We then quantified the possible spatial risk areas in Thailand for NiV transmission from (i) bats to livestock to humans, (ii) bats to humans via indirect foodborne transmission, and (iii) directly from bats to humans to humans. The spatial risk maps of the potential zoonotic spillover via each transmission pathway of NiV from P. lylei in Thailand were then determined by masking the area of livestock, foodborne sources, and village boundaries in ArcGIS (see above). Final outputs were produced by selecting the high transmission risk areas via pathways of NiV spillover from P. lylei to livestock, by foodborne sources, and by humans, then overlaying population density (people/km2) according to sub districts of Thailand where the presence of NiV was considered likely.
Figure 2.
Conceptual framework of the study.
RESULTS
Ecological Niche Modeling
Annual mean temperature (Bio1; importance 56.9%) was the climate variable that had the greatest importance in our P. lylei ecological niche model. The minimum temperature of the coldest month (Bio6; importance 9.5%), mean temperature of the warmest quarter (Bio10; importance 6.9%), mean temperature of coldest quarter (Bio11; importance 6.5%), and temperature seasonality (standard deviation × 100) (Bio4; importance 6.2%) were also retained as environmental predictors (Table 1).
Table 1.
Percentage (> 1%) Contributions and Sample Average Contribution of Variables Used in the Ecological Niche Model for Pteropus lylei Reservoir Host Distribution in Thailand, Cambodia, and Vietnam.
Variable | Percentage contribution | Sample average (± sd) |
---|---|---|
| ||
Annual mean temperature | 56.9 | 27.80 (± 0.26)°C |
Minimum temperature of coldest month | 9.5 | 29.45 (± 0.31)°C |
Mean temperature of warmest quarter | 6.9 | 20.07 (± 1.05)°C |
Mean temperature of coldest quarter | 6.5 | 141.13 (± 18.16) |
Temperature seasonality (standard deviation × 100) | 6.2 | 25.91 (± 0.42)°C |
Annual precipitation | 4.6 | 1,255.93 (± 214.06) mm |
Maximum temperature of warmest month | 3.6 | 35.07 (± 0.92)°C |
Precipitation of wettest quarter | 1.8 | 14.99 (± 1.87)°C |
The climate variables under present conditions were used to determine the suitability levels of the current geographic distribution of P. lylei in Thailand, Cambodia, and Vietnam (Fig. 3). Areas of high suitability for P. lylei were restricted to central, some eastern, and western regions of Thailand (15 provinces including Bangkok, the capital of Thailand), and the flat plain around Tonle Sap Lake of Cambodia (five provinces including Phnom Penh, the capital of Cambodia), with suitability declining toward the estuary of the Mekong river in southern Vietnam.
Figure 3.
Potential suitability revealed by ecological niche modeling of the geographic area currently occupied by Pteropus lylei in Thailand, Cambodia, and Vietnam.
Area of future (2050 and 2070) habitat suitability for P. lylei were conducted by considering two different emission scenarios (RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5). Our distribution models indicated a marked expansion of the species range as a result of climate change: particularly suitable areas for P. lylei included lower northern, northeastern, eastern, and upper southern Thailand; almost all of Cambodia; and lower southern Vietnam (Fig. 4A–D). Future areas of P. lylei habitat suitability increased over time in both Thailand and Cambodia (Fig. 4A–D, dark green). The MOP results indicated broad areas of high-risk extrapolation for P. lylei in all transfer scenarios (Fig. 4E–H); light blue values represent high-risk extrapolation areas and dark blue values represent levels of similarity between the calibration area and the different future conditions (2050 and 2070) under the RCP scenarios used in the projections.
Figure 4.
Predicted future climatic suitability for Pteropus lylei asc reservoir hosts of NiV (A–D) and the results of a MOP analysis for extrapolating risk from the calibration area under current conditions to the whole study area under future conditions (E–H).
Mapping the Potential for NiV Spillover from P. lylei
The central-western region of Thailand was an area with high suitability for P. lylei occurrence (high = 38,904 km2, medium = 24,432 km2, low = 38,904 km2; Fig. 5). A risk map based on habitat suitability for P. lylei combined with land use layers for various transmission pathway of NiV (e.g., from P. lylei to livestock, then to humans) identified high-risk areas covering a total human population of 244,640 in 22 provinces, 127 districts, and 670 sub districts (1522 km2, 57% of the total livestock area); these areas were largely in the upper central, western, and eastern regions of the country (Fig. 6A). The high-risk areas for the transmission of NiV from P. lylei via foodborne sources to humans covered a total human population of 718,982; these areas were distributed in 23 provinces, 165 districts, and 1071 sub districts in the upper and western, central and eastern areas (11,844 km2, 35% of the total foodborne source areas; Fig. 6B). High-risk areas for the direct transmission of NiV from P. lylei to humans were identified in areas with a high human population density (approximate total population of 2,244,636); the areas were concentrated in 23 provinces, 197 districts, and 1336 sub districts in central and eastern areas of Thailand (20,055 km2, 68% of the total village area; Fig. 6C). Furthermore, we found that a total population of 227,582 in 22 provinces, 126 districts, and 687 sub districts was at a high risk of the combination of all three routes of NiV transmission (Fig. 6D and Supplementary Table 4).
Figure 5.
Map of Nipah virus spillover risk (high, medium, low) from Pteropus lylei reservoir hosts in Thailand. Protected areas denoted with hatching.
Figure 6.
Risk map based on transmission routes for Nipah virus in Thailand from Pteropus lylei to livestock (A), via foodborne sources (B), and including human-to-human transmission (C).
Discussion
This study mapped the risk of Nipah virus transmission from bats to humans through the intersection of suitable habitat for the P. lylei bat reservoir and spatial data for other risk factors related to specific transmission pathways for NiV. We show that the current and future areas of NiV spillover risk from P. lylei in Thailand, Cambodia, and Vietnam are extensive and will increase over time under various climate change scenarios.
The climatic variable that best explained the ecological niche for P. lylei was the annual mean temperature. This finding is supported in nature by a strong correlation between the annual number of P. lylei deaths and the mean ambient temperature (Hengjan et al. 2018). An estimated 29% of anomalous bat mortality is caused by warming; 49% of such mortality is caused by the El Nino/Southern Oscillation (Thirumalai et al. 2017). Hengjan et al. (2018) reported that the highest number of P. lylei deaths occurred during March and April, which is the period with the highest temperature in Thailand. This is similar to the effects of temperature extremes on Australian flying foxes in Australia, where bioclimatic variables are likely drivers of the spatial patterns of Hendra virus spillover from P. alecto and P. conspicillatus into horses, then humans (Welbergen et al. 2008; Martin et al. 2016). Regular population surveys for P. lylei in Thailand, Cambodia, and Vietnam will be critical to validate our model of this species’ occurrence and project range expansion in 2050 and beyond. Our ENMs and risk map can be used to prioritize regions for future pandemic preparedness (i.e., increased and targeted human and animal surveillance for NiV), but also to understand the potential conservation impact of bat dieoffs in the context of future climatic changes.
Our findings support the results of previous studies that have used ENM to demonstrate a much broader regional and countrywide risk for potential NiV outbreaks. Hahn et al. (2014b), Peterson (2015), Walsh (2015), and Deka and Morshed (2018) developed ecological niche models based on human populations and Pteropus roosting sites in South and Southeast Asia. Daszak et al. (2013) used an ensemble modeling approach to predict the impacts of climate change on the potential distribution of henipavirus hosts across the world. In contrast, Thanapongtharm et al. (2015) employed a landscape variable approach across central Thailand based on P. lylei roosting sites; they used a potential surface analysis application to map the current NiV risk areas. Our broad-scale analysis, strengthened by data from our research team’s P. lylei roosting survey data, was in broadly in concordance with findings by Daszak et al. (2013), Hahn et al. (2014b), Peterson (2015), and Deka and Morshed (2018). However, we added sub-analyses of spatial risk through a mechanistic understanding of various NiV transmission pathways. Targeting transmission pathways between reservoir hosts and humans is an effective prevention and control strategy for zoonotic emerging infectious diseases that has the benefit of moving beyond disease-specific prevention approaches (Loh et al. 2015). Our study adds to this important base of knowledge using a more detailed analysis to identify the potential NiV spillover risk under three different routes of transmission in Thailand. These analyses identified high-risk areas that were suitable for NiV transmission from P. lylei to humans: (i) indirectly via livestock—primarily in a small area around upper central and eastern Thailand with a low human population density; (ii) indirectly via foodborne sources—primarily in a large area of western and eastern Thailand, with medium levels of population density; and (iii) directly to humans in a large metropolitan area in central Thailand with high human population density. Our analysis provides insights into which NiV transmission pathways are important in Thailand and where variable drivers of emerging infectious diseases are present. Thus, our findings can facilitate more targeted prevention measures, surveillance efforts at a sub-national and sub-province level, and development of early warning systems.
In Thailand, livestock and orchard fruit products are in high demand in the domestic and export markets (International Trade Centre, 2020). Smallholder agriculture systems and free-range livestock are possible risk factors for disease transmission through contact between animals and humans. NiV has been shown to infect livestock, including pigs, cattle, and goats (Luby et al. 2009a). We demonstrated that the overlap of livestock, orchards, and the centers of human communities varied across the study area (Fig. S1A–C). In Thailand, traditional pig farms and cattle farms are interspersed among orchards that grow a variety of fruit crops. These farms normally have fruit trees around the animal pens, and the seasonal activity of P. lylei in these locations has been reported by Weber et al. (2015). In Malaysia, farms served as the zoonotic transmission route for NiV emergence through pigs as an intermediate host (Field et al. 2001). NiV-BD transmission from bats to humans has occurred through the consumption of contaminated date palm sap by P. medius (formerly named P. giganteus) (Luby et al. 2006). We found that 22 provinces, 126 districts, and 687 sub districts were potential high-risk contact zones for NiV transmission via the combined P. lylei, livestock, foodborne, and human population routes; these locations should be prioritized for NiV surveillance.
One potential limitation of our study was that we only used the locations of P. lylei roosting sites to indicate their presence, whereas NiV spillovers can occur in locations where flying foxes forage or visit. There may be a spatial difference between areas used by flying foxes as roosting sites and areas where NiV is transmitted to livestock or becomes foodborne and then transfers to humans, as suggested in Malaysia, Bangladesh, and India (Field et al. 2001; Chua et al. 2002; Luby et al. 2006; Chattu et al. 2018). We considered dispersal distance in our ENM using the best available data from GPS tracking (Weber et al. 2015), but future efforts should consider long-distance or long-term bat movement, more detailed knowledge of foraging behavior (Giles et al. 2018), and the potential interactions between humans and bats to improve regional risk mapping efforts.
In summary, our study used ecological niche models to identify the current and future range of P. lylei, a key bat reservoir host species for NiV, in Thailand, Cambodia, and Vietnam. We overlaid habitat suitability maps with high-resolution, in-country data from Thailand to identify potential sites for NiV spillover based on three different transmission pathways. Together, these data will help to improve our understanding of the ecological influences on NiV presence and transmission. The risk maps produced in this study will also provide an important baseline for guiding active NiV surveillance and can be used to shape policy decisions for surveillance, depending on the primary transmission pathway in each region. Our analyses and research approach can inform NiV awareness and prevention programs aimed at reducing disease outbreaks and their associated economic losses across Southeast Asia and beyond.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a Research Chair Grant (P-13-01091) “Zoonotic diseases: role of reservoirs and vectors, diagnosis, mechanism and therapeutic”, by the Cluster and Program Management Office (CPMO) (P-15-50535); the “Wildlife Habitat restoration for prey species of tiger in Dong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex” (P-18-51249) of the National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA); the Centre for Advanced Studies in Tropical Natural Resources, National Research University, Kasetsart University, (CASTNAR, NRU-KU), Bangkok, Thailand; the EID-SEARCH project under the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (U01AI151797); and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Emerging Pandemic Threats PREDICT program.
Footnotes
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-022-01588-6.
REFERENCES
- Ambat AS, Zubair SM, Prasad N, Pundir P, Rajwar E, Patil DS, Mangad P (2019) Nipah virus: a review on epidemiological characteristics and outbreaks to inform public health decision making. Journal of Infection and Public Health 12:634–639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ang B, Lim T, Wang L (2018) Nipah virus infection. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 56:1875–1817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barve N, Barve V, Jiménez-Valverde A, Lira-Noriega A, Maher SP, Peterson AT, Soberón J, Villalobos F (2011) The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Ecological Modelling 222:1810–1819 [Google Scholar]
- Boria RA, Olson LE, Goodman SM, Anderson RP (2014) Spatial filtering to reduce sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models. Ecological Modelling 275:73–77 [Google Scholar]
- Bumrungsri S, Suyanto A, Francis C (2008) Pteropus lylei IUCN Red List of 525 Threatened Species Version 2014.1. Available: www.iucnredlist.org [accessed March 16, 2020] [Google Scholar]
- CDC (1999) Outbreak of Hendra-Like Virus — Malaysia and Singapore, 1998–1999. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 48(13):265–269 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chadha MS, Comer JA, Lowe L, Rota PA, Rollin PE, Bellini WJ, Ksiazek TG, Mishra AC (2006) Nipah virus-associated encephalitis outbreak, Siliguri. India. Emerging Infectious Diseases 12(2):235–240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chaiyes A, Duengkae P, Wacharapluesadee S, Pongpattananurak N, Olival KJ, Hemachudha T (2017) Assessing the distribution, roosting site characteristics, and population of Pteropus lylei in Thailand. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 65:670–680 [Google Scholar]
- Chaiyes A, Escobar LE, Willcox EV, Duengkae P, Suksavate W, Watcharaanantapong P, Pongpattananurak P, Wacharapluesadee S, Hemachudha T (2020) An assessment of the niche centroid hypothesis: Pteropus lylei (Chiroptera). Ecosphere;. 10.1002/ecs2.3134[OnlineMay30,2020] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chattu VK, Kumar R, Kumary S, Kajal F, David JK (2018) Nipah virus epidemic in southern India and emphasizing “One Health” approach to ensure global health security. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 7(2):275–283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ching PK (2014) de los Reyes VC, Sucaldito MN, Tayag E, Columna-Vingno AB, Malbas FF Jr, Bolo GC Jr, Sejvar JJ, g D, Playford G, Dueger E, Kaku, Morikawa, Kuroda M, Marsh GA, McCullough S, Foxwell AR (2015) Outbreak of henipavirus infection, Philippines. Emerging Infectious Diseases 21(2):328–331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choden K, Ravon S, Epstein JH, Hoem T, Furey N, Gely M, Jolivot A, Hul V, Neung C, Tran A, Cappelle J (2019) Pteropus lylei primarily forages in residential areas in Kandal, Cambodia. Ecology and Evolution 9:4181–4191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chowdhury S, Khan SU, Crameri G, Epstein JH, Broder CC, Islam A, Peel AJ, Barr J, Daszak P, Wang LF, Luby SP (2014) Serological Evidence of Henipavirus Exposure in Cattle, Goats and Pigs in Bangladesh. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 8(11):e3302. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003302[OnlineNovember20,2014] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chua KB (2003) Nipah virus outbreak in Malaysia. Journal of Clinical Virology 26:265–275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chua KB, Goh KJ, Wong KT, Kamarulzaman A, Tan PS, Ksiazek TG, Zaki SR, Paul G, Lam SK, Tan CT (1999) Fatal encephalitis due to Nipah virus among pig-farmers in Malaysia. The Lancet 354:1257–1259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chua KB, Koh CL, Hooi PS, Wee KF, Khong JH, Chua BH, Chan YP, Lim ME, Lam SK (2002) Isolation of Nipah virus from Malaysian Island flying-foxes. Microbes and Infection 4:145–151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cobos ME, Peterson AT, Barve N, Osorio-Olvera L (2019) kuenm: An R package for detailed development of ecological niche models using Maxent. PeerJ 7:e6281. 10.7717/peerj.6281[OnlineFebruary6,2019] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cooper JC, Soberón J (2018) Creating individual accessible area hypotheses improves stacked species distribution model performance. Global Ecology and Biogeography 27:156–165 [Google Scholar]
- Daszak P, Zambrana-Torrelio C, Bogich TL, Fernandez M, Epstein JH, Murray KA, Hamilton H (2013) Interdisciplinary approaches to understanding disease emergence: The past, present, and future drivers of Nipah virus emergence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110:3681–3688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeBuysscher BL, de Wit E, Munster VJ, Scott D, Feldmann H, Prescott J (2013) Comparison of the pathogenicity of Nipah virus isolates from Bangladesh and Malaysia in the Syrian hamster. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 7(1):e2024; DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002024 [Online Jan 17, 2013] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deka MA, Morshed N (2018) Mapping disease transmission risk of Nipah virus in South and Southeast Asia. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 3(2):57; DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed3020057 [Online May 30, 2018] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duengkae P, Srikhunmuang P, Chaiyes A, Suksavate W, Pongpattananurak N, Wacharapluesadee S, Hemachudha T (2019) Patch metrics of roosting site selection by Lyle’s flying fox (Pteropus lylei Andersen, 1908) in a human-dominated landscape in Thailand. Folia Oecologica 46:63–73 [Google Scholar]
- Ersts PJ (2021) Geographic Distance Matrix Generator (version 1.2.3). American Museum of Natural History. Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, Available: http://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/opensource/gdmg [accessed October 12, 2021] [Google Scholar]
- Escobar LE, Lira-Noriega A, Medina-Vogel G, Peterson AT (2014) Potential for spread of White-nose fungus (Pseudogymnoascus destructans) in the Americas: Using Maxent and NicheA to assure strict model transference. Geospatial Health 11:221–229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fick SE, Hijmans RJ (2017) Worldclim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 10.1002/joc.5086[OnlineMay15,2017] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Field H, Young P, Yob JM, Mills J, Hall L, Mackenzie J (2001) The natural history of Hendra and Nipah viruses. Microbes and Infection 3:307–314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fogarty R, Halpin K, Hyatt AD, Daszak P, Mungall BA (2008) Henipavirus susceptibility to environmental variables. Virus Research 132(1–2):140–144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fourcade Y, Engler JO, Rödder D, Secondi J (2014) Mapping species distributions with MAXENT using a geographically biased sample of presence data: a performance assessment of methods for correcting sampling bias. PloS One 9(5):e97122. 10.1371/journal.pone.0097122[OnlineMay12,2014] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giles JR, Eby P, Parry H, Peel AJ, Plowright RK, Westcott DA, McCallum H (2018) Environmental drivers of spatiotemporal foraging intensity in fruit bats and implications for Hendra virus ecology. Scientific Reports 8:9555. 10.1038/s41598-018-27859-3[OnlineJune22,2018] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gurley ES, Montgomery JM, Hossain MJ, Islam MR, Molla MA, Shamsuzzaman SM (2007) Risk of nosocomial transmission of Nipah virus in a Bangladesh hospital. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 28:740–742 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hahn MB, Gurley ES, Epstein JH, Islam MS, Patz JA, Daszak P, Luby SP (2014) The role of landscape composition and configuration on Pteropus giganteus roosting ecology and Nipah virus spillover risk in Bangladesh. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 90(2):247–255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hauser N, Gushiken AC, Narayanan S, Kottilil S, Chua JV (2021) Evolution of Nipah virus infection: past, present, and future considerations. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 6(1):24; DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed6010024. [Online February 14,2021] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hengjan Y, Sae-Koo N, Phichitrasilp T, Ohmori Y, Fujinami H, Hondo E (2018) Seasonal variation in the number of deaths in Pteropus lylei at Wat Pho Bang Khla temple, Thailand. The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 80(8):1364–1367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hsu VP, Hossain MJ, Parashar UD, Ali MM, Ksiazek TG, Kuzmin IV, Niezgoda M, Rupprecht CE, Bresee J, Breiman RF (2004) Nipah virus encephalitis reemergence, Bangladesh. Emerging Infectious Diseases 10(12):2082–2087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hurvich CM, Tsai C-L (1989) Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76:297–307 [Google Scholar]
- International Trade Centre (2020) Country Profile Thailand. Available: http://www.intracen.org/exporters/organic-products/country-focus/Country-Profile-Thailand/ [accessed April 9, 2020]
- IUCN (2021) Pteropus Lylei. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Available: www.iucnredlist.org. [accessed February 3, 2021] [Google Scholar]
- Jenks GF (1967) The data model concept in statistical mapping. International Yearbook of Cartography 7:186–190 [Google Scholar]
- Loh EH, Zambrana-Torrelio C, Olival KJ, Bogich TL, Johnson CK, Mazet JAK, Karesh W, Daszak P (2015) Targeting Transmission Pathways for Emerging Zoonotic Disease Surveillance and Control. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 15(7):432–437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luby SP, Rahman M, Hossain J, Blum LS, Husain MM, Gurley E (2006) Foodborne transmission of Nipah virus, Bangladesh. Emerging Infectious Diseases 12(12):1888–1894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luby SP, Gurley ES, Hossain MJ (2009) Transmission of Human Infection with Nipah Virus. Clinical Infectious Diseases 49(11):1743–1748 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luby SP, Hossain MJ, Gurley ES, Ahmed BN, Banu S, Khan SU, Homaira N, Rota PA, Rollin PE, Comer JA, Kenah E, Ksiazek TG, Rahman M (2009) Recurrent zoonotic transmission of Nipah virus into humans, Bangladesh, 2001–2007. Emerging Infectious Diseases 15(8):1229–1235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin GA, Yañez-Arenas C, Roberts BJ, Chen C, Plowright RK, Webb RJ, Skerratt LF (2016) Climatic suitability influences species specific abundance patterns of Australian flying foxes and risk of Hendra virus spillover. One Health 2:115–121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McSweeney CF, Jones RG, Lee RW, Rowell DP (2015) Selecting CMIP5 GCMs for downscaling over multiple regions. Climate Dynamics 44:3237–3260 [Google Scholar]
- Mohd Nor MN, Gan CH, Ong BL (2000) Nipah virus infection of pigs in peninsular Malaysia. Revue Scientifique Et Technique 19(1):160–165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ostfeld RS, Glass GE, Keesing F (2005) Spatial epidemiology: an emerging (or re-emerging) discipline. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20(6):328–336. 10.1016/j.tree.2005.03.009.[OnlineMarch25,2005] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Owens HL, Campbell LP, Dornak LL, Saupe EE, Barve N, Soberón J, Ingenloff K, Lira-Noriega A, Hensz CM, Myers CE, Peterson AT (2013) Constraints on interpretation of ecological niche models by limited environmental ranges on calibration areas. Ecological Modelling 263:10–18 [Google Scholar]
- Peterson AT (2006) Ecological niche modelling and understanding the geography of disease transmission. Veterinaria Italiana 43(3):393–400 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peterson AT (2014) Mapping disease transmission risk, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press [Google Scholar]
- Peterson AT (2015) Mapping risk of Nipah virus transmission across Asia and across Bangladesh. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health 27(2):824–832 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peterson AT, Papeş M, Soberón J (2008) Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling. Ecological Modelling 213:63–72 [Google Scholar]
- Peterson AT, Soberón J, Pearson RG, Anderson RP, Martínez-Meyer E, Nakamura M, Araújo MB (2011) Ecological niches and geographic distributions, Princeton: Princeton University Press [Google Scholar]
- Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190:231–259 [Google Scholar]
- Phillips SJ, Dudík M, Schapire RE (2018) Maxent software for modeling species niches and distributions (Version 3.4.1) Available: http://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/maxent/ [accessed August 5, 2018] [Google Scholar]
- Plowright RK, Parrish CR, McCallum H, Hudson PJ, Ko AI, Graham AL, Lloyd-Smith JO (2017) Pathways to zoonotic spillover. Nature Reviews Microbiology 15:502–510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poo-Muñoz DA, Escobar LE, Peterson AT, Astorga F, Organ JF, Medina-Vogel G (2014) Galictis cuja (Mammalia): An update of current knowledge and geographic distribution. Iheringia, Série Zoologia 104:341–346 [Google Scholar]
- R Core Team (2018) R: a language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing [Google Scholar]
- Ravon S, Furey NM, Hul V, Cappelle J (2014) A rapid assessment of flying fox (Pteropus spp.) colonies in Cambodia. Cambodian Journal of Natural History 1:14–18 [Google Scholar]
- Reynes J, Counor D, Ong S, Faure C, Seng V, Molia S, Walston J, Georges-Courbot MC, Deubel V, Sarthou J (2005) Nipah virus in Lyle’s flying foxes, Cambodia. Emerging Infectious Diseases 11(7):1042–1047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rota PA, Lo MK (2012) Molecular Virology of the Henipaviruses. In: Henipavirus: Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, Lee B, Rota P (editors), Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Press, pp 41–58 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharma V, Kaushik S, Kumar R, Yadav JP, Kaushik S (2019) Emerging trends of Nipah virus: a review. Reviews in medical virology 29:e2010; DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2010 [Online September 24,2018] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skowron K, Justyna BK, Katarzyna GB, Natalia WK, Maciej Z, Zuzanna B, Eugenia GK (2022) Nipah Virus-Another Threat From the World of Zoonotic Viruses. Frontiers in Microbiology. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.811157[OnlineJanuary22,2022] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soberón J, Peterson AT (2005) Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species’ distributional areas. Biodiversity Informatics 2:1–10 [Google Scholar]
- Thanapongtharm W, Linard C, Wiriyarat W, Chinsorn P, Kanchanasaka B, Xiao X, Biradar C, Wallace RG, Gilbert M (2015) Spatial characterization of colonies of the flying fox bat, a carrier of Nipah virus in Thailand. BMC Veterinary Research 11:81–94 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thirumalai K, DiNezio P, Okumura Y, Deser C (2017) Extreme temperatures in Southeast Asia caused by El Niño and worsened by global warming. Nature Communication 8:15531, 10.1038/ncomms15531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wacharapluesadee S, Lumlertdacha B, Boongird K, Wanghongsa S, Chanhome L, Rollin P, Stockton P, Rupprecht CE, Ksiazek TG, Hemachudha T (2005) Bat Nipah virus, Thailand. Emerging Infectious Diseases 11:1949–1951 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wacharapluesadee S, Boongird K, Wanghongsa S, Ratanasetyuth N, Supavonwong P, Saengsen D, Gongal GN, Hemachudha T (2010) A longitudinal study of the prevalence of Nipah virus in Pteropus lylei bats in Thailand: evidence for seasonal preference in disease transmission. Vector Borne Zoonotic Diseases 10:183–190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wacharapluesadee S, Ngamprasertwong T, Kaewpom T, Kattong P, Rodpan A, Wanghongsa S, Hemachudha T (2013) Genetic characterization of Nipah virus from Thai fruit bats (Pteropus lylei). Asian Biomedicine 7:813–819 [Google Scholar]
- Wacharapluesadee S, Samseeneam P, Phermpool M, Kaewpom T, Rodpan A, Maneeorn P, Srongmongkol P, Kanchanasaka B, Hemachudha T (2016) Molecular characterization of Nipah virus from Pteropus hypomelanus in Southern Thailand. Virology Journal 13:53; DOI: 10.1186/s12985-016-0510-x [Online March 25, 2016] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wacharapluesadee S, Ghai S, Duengkae P, Manee-Orn P, Thanapongtharm W, Saraya AW, Yingsakmongkon S, Joyjinda Y, Suradhat S, Ampoot W, Nuansrichay B, Kaewpom T, Tantilertcharoen R, Rodpan A, Wongsathapornchai K, Ponpinit T, Buathong R, Bunprakob S, Damrongwatanapokin S, Ruchiseesarod C, Petcharat S, Kalpravidh W, Olival KJ, Stokes MM, Hemachudha T (2021) Two decades of one health surveillance of Nipah virus in Thailand. One Health Outlook. 5;3(1):12;DOI: 10.1186/s42522-021-00044-9 [Online July 5, 2021] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walsh MG (2015) Mapping the risk of Nipah virus spillover into human populations in South and Southeast Asia. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine & Hygiene 109:563–571 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weber N, Duengkae P, Fahr J, Dechmann DKN, Phengsakul P, Khumbucha W, Siriaroonrat B, Wacharapluesadee S, Maneeorn P, WikelskiNewman MS (2015) High-resolution GPS tracking of Lyle’s flying fox between temples and orchards in central Thailand. The Journal of Wildlife Management 79(6):957–968 [Google Scholar]
- Welbergen JA, Klose SM, Markus N, Eby P (2008) Climate change and the effects of temperature extremes on Australian flying-foxes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 275:419–425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.