Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 22;61(4):e01626-22. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01626-22

TABLE 2.

Identification results by different identification methods of all 116 patientsa

Identification method and species No. (%) identified
MGIT-seq, cgMLST
M. avium subsp. hominissuis 68 (58.6)
M. intracellulare subsp. intracellulare 25 (21.6)
M. intracellulare subsp. chimaera 2 (1.7)
M. abscessus subsp. abscessus 3 (2.6)
M. abscessus subsp. massiliense 5 (4.3)
M. kansasii 1 (0.9)
M. lentiflavum 2 (1.7)
M. peregrinum 2 (1.7)
M. fortuitum subsp. fortuitum 1 (0.9)
M. porcinum 1 (0.9)
M. paragordonae 3 (2.6)
M. gordonae 1 (0.9)
M. chelonae 1 (0.9)
M. szulgai 1 (0.9)
TRC
M. avium 67 (57.9)
M. intracellulare 27 (23.3)
MALDI-TOF MS
M. avium 68 (58.6)
M. intracellulare 27 (23.3)
M. abscessus 8 (6.9)
M. kansasii 1 (0.9)
M. lentiflavum 2 (1.7)
M. peregrinum 2 (1.7)
M. fortuitum complex 2 (1.8)
M. paragordonae 1 (0.9)
M. gordonae 1 (0.9)
M. chelonae 1 (0.9)
 Unidentified 3 (2.6)
Multiplex PCR and chromatographic detection
M. abscessus subsp. abscessus/M. abscessus subsp. bolletii 3 (2.6)
M. abscessus subsp. massiliense 5 (4.3)
a

MGIT-seq, direct sequence of positive mycobacterial growth indicator tube broth; cgMLST, core genome multilocus sequence typing; TRC, transcription-reverse transcription concerted reaction; MALDI-TOF MS, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry.