Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 22;61(4):e01626-22. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01626-22

TABLE 3.

Efficacy of macrolide resistance prediction by MGIT-seq in comparison of drug susceptibility testsa

Species (n = 103) Genotype with rrl position at:
Data for erm(41)
Predicted macrolide susceptibility No. (%) Drug susceptibility test No. (%)
2058 2059 State Genotype at position 28
M. abscessus isolates (n = 8) A A Complete T R 3 (3.0) R 3 (3.0)
A A Truncated T S 5 (4.9) S 5 (4.9)
MAC isolates (n = 95) A A None S 77 (74.7) S 75 (72.8)
I 1 (1.0)
R 1 (1.0)
G A None R 3 (3.0) R 3 (3.0)
C A None R 6 (5.8) R 6 (5.8)
T A None R 2 (1.9) R 1 (1.0)
S 1 (1.0)
A G None R 3 (3.0) R 2 (1.9)
S 1 (1.0)
A C None R 4 (3.9) R 4 (3.9)
a

MGIT-seq, direct sequence of positive mycobacterial growth indicator tube broth; MAC, Mycobacterium avium complex; R, resistant; I, intermediate; S, susceptible.