Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;89(2):641–658. doi: 10.3233/JAD-215728

Table 5.

bvAD compared to bvFTD (using peak clusters) and aAD (using subpeak clusters)

Hemisphere Region T. statistic X Y Z
bvAD versus bvFTD
Left Orbital part of inferior frontal gyrus 3.9745 −50 38 −15
Fusiform gyrus −3.6424 −42 −51 −18
Central operculum −3.6974 −45 −20 19
Right Superior temporal gyrus −3.6619 55 −36 10
bvAD versus aAD
Left Medial orbital gyrus −3.029 −14 23 −18
Gyrus rectus −4.277 9 30 −22
Planum polare −4.057 52 3 −4
Fusiform gyrus −3.765 38 −40 −22
Superior frontal gyrus medial segment −3.717 7 32 35
Right Middle temporal gyrus −3.711 58 1 −23
Middle temporal gyrus −3.673 48 −52 13
Middle temporal gyrus −3.523 69 −45 2
Anterior cingulate gyrus −3.436 3 46 3
Inferior temporal gyrus −3.401 55 −7 −43
Middle temporal gyrus −3.386 68 −26 −18

Results are based on a voxelwise statistical threshold of p < 0.001, uncorrected for multiple comparisons. Negative T-statistic values indicate regions where bvAD has cortical thinning relative to a comparison group.