Table 5. Effect of termination treatment on termination efficiency and biomass change for wheat and cereal rye^a.

		Wheat			Cereal rye
Treatment	Rate (ai g ha-1)	Visible termination (14 DAT)	Visible termination (28 DAT)	Biomass reduction (%)	Visible termination (14 DAT)	Visible termination (28 DAT)	Biomass reduction (%)
Clethodimb	275	35d	40d	9de	34d	38c	7c
Glufosinatec	657	77b	78b	16c	93a	96a	27a
Glyphosatec	1268	88ab	97a	26ab	94a	97a	28a
Glufosinate + Glyphosatec	1268 + 657	88ab	95a	26ab	93a	96a	27a
Paraquatd	700	93a	96a	24b	99a	99a	26a
Paraquat+metribuzind	560 + 262	89a	96a	29a	96a	98a	24a
Quizalofopd	233	48c	60c	16c	50bc	53bc	13bc
Saflufenacile	100	36d	41d	11d	61b	64b	17b
Sethoxydimd	425	34d	42d	6e	41cd	43c	9c
Rolling-crimpingf		34d	41d	10de	34d	61b	13bc

^aVisible termination and biomass reduction means with a column followed by the same letter are statistically similar to each other at 5% level of significance

^bNon-ionic surfactant applied at 0.25% v/v

^cAmmonium sulfate applied at 1% w/v

^d Crop oil concentrate applied at 1% v/v

^eMethylated seed oil applied at 1% v/v

^fV-bar roller crimper (I&J Manufacturing, Gordonville, PA) was hollow from inside, 2.4 m in length, 38 cm diameter, 9.5 mm thickness, fully filled with water weighing 1002 kg used for rolling-crimping treatment