Abstract
Although several ribosomal protein paralogs are expressed in a tissue-specific manner, how these proteins affect translation and why they are required only in certain tissues have remained unclear. Here we show that RPL3L, a paralog of RPL3 specifically expressed in heart and skeletal muscle, influences translation elongation dynamics. Deficiency of RPL3L-containing ribosomes in RPL3L knockout male mice resulted in impaired cardiac contractility. Ribosome occupancy at mRNA codons was found to be altered in the RPL3L-deficient heart, and the changes were negatively correlated with those observed in myoblasts overexpressing RPL3L. RPL3L-containing ribosomes were less prone to collisions compared with RPL3-containing canonical ribosomes. Although the loss of RPL3L-containing ribosomes altered translation elongation dynamics for the entire transcriptome, its effects were most pronounced for transcripts related to cardiac muscle contraction and dilated cardiomyopathy, with the abundance of the encoded proteins being correspondingly decreased. Our results provide further insight into the mechanisms and physiological relevance of tissue-specific translational regulation.
Subject terms: Ribosomal proteins, Heart failure, Ribosome
RPL3L is a paralog of the ribosomal protein RPL3 and specifically expressed in heart and skeletal muscle. Here, the authors show that RPL3L-containing ribosomes regulate translation elongation dynamics especially for the transcripts related to cardiac muscle contraction.
Introduction
Information encoded by an mRNA is translated by ribosomes for production of the corresponding protein. The ribosome is a ribonucleoprotein complex that in eukaryotes consists of a small 40S subunit composed of 33 ribosomal proteins (RPs) and 18S rRNA as well as a large 60S subunit composed of 47 RPs and 5S, 5.8S, and 28S rRNAs1. Although ribosomes have generally been considered to be homogeneous with regard to their structure and organization, recent studies have revealed the existence of differences in ribosome organization and posttranslational modifications and have led to the proposal of concepts such as “ribosome heterogeneity” and a “ribosome code” analogous to the histone code hypothesis2–6. Such concepts are based on the notion that this heterogeneity gives rise to specific translational regulation that adds additional complexity to the control of gene expression and which is important for a variety of physiological processes. For example, ribosomes in mouse embryonic stem cells show a heterogeneous RP composition, with those containing RPS25/eS25 or RPL10A/uL1 preferentially translating specific subsets of mRNAs that contribute to metabolism, the cell cycle, and development7. Phosphorylation of the Ser38 residue of RPL12/uL11 is also more prevalent in monosomes than in polysomes and affects cell cycle progression by regulating the translation of a specific subset of mitosis-related mRNAs8.
Many RP paralogs have been identified in eukaryotes, some of which are expressed in a tissue-specific manner9. In mammals, RPL10L/uL16L and RPL39L/eL39L show testis-specific expression, and expression of RPL3L is restricted to heart and skeletal muscle10–14. Male meiotic cells inactivate both X and Y chromosomes, a process termed meiotic sex chromosome inactivation15, and expression of RPL10L and RPL39L (which are encoded by somatic chromosomes) may compensate for the deficiency of RPL10 and RPL39 (which are encoded by the X chromosome) during this process16,17. In contrast to the situation for the testis-specific RP paralogs, expression of RPL3/uL3 is maintained in skeletal and cardiac muscle, albeit at a lower level than in other tissues, suggesting that expression of RPL3L might in part serve to complement this low level of RPL3 expression in these tissues14. Although their amino acid sequences are similar overall and the proteins likely occupy the same position in the ribosome, RPL3L and RPL3 may have different functions to some extent given that they differ at about one-quarter of their amino acid positions18. RPL3L expression is downregulated during induction of skeletal muscle hypertrophy in mice19. Forced expression of RPL3L in C2C12 myogenic cells inhibits myoblast fusion and myotube growth19, whereas loss of RPL3L increases ribosome-mitochondrion interactions in mouse cardiomyocytes20. Furthermore, mutations of the human RPL3L gene have been detected in individuals with atrial fibrillation or neonatal dilated cardiomyopathy21–25.
RPL3 is evolutionarily conserved and is the RP located closest to the peptidyl transferase center (PTC) of the ribosome26. It folds as a globular domain and possesses three fingerlike structures that are positioned near the A-site tRNA (A-tRNA) binding pocket of the PTC and are known as the NH2-terminal extension, the Trp finger (W finger), and the basic thumb, with both the W finger and the basic thumb being part of a central loop26. A W255C mutation in the W finger of yeast Rpl3 affects the conformation of the A-tRNA binding pocket of the PTC, resulting in reduced peptidyl transferase activity26,27. In addition, His245 of human RPL3 is methylated by the methyltransferase METTL18, and defective methylation results in an increased rate of elongation at Tyr codons and aggregation of Tyr-rich proteins28,29.
In the present study, we generated RPL3L-deficient mice and found that loss of RPL3L results in impaired cardiac contractility. Translation elongation dynamics were shown to be altered and the frequency of ribosome collisions to be increased in the RPL3L-null heart, resulting in reduced expression of proteins that contribute to cardiac function. Our data indicate that RPL3L-containing ribosomes (RPL3L-ribosomes) are required for proper cardiac function as a result of their regulation of translation elongation dynamics.
Results
Expression pattern and predicted 3D structure of RPL3L
RPL3L was previously shown to be expressed specifically in heart and skeletal muscle18, and we validated this finding by analysis of RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data for a wider range of human tissues from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) database. We thus found that RPL3L was indeed highly expressed only in heart and skeletal muscle, whereas RPL3 was ubiquitously expressed, although its expression level in heart and skeletal muscle was lower than that in other tissues (Fig. 1a). RNA-seq data for mouse tissues confirmed a similar expression pattern for Rpl3l and Rpl3 (Supplementary Fig. 1a)30,31. Further analysis of publicly available single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) data for the human heart revealed that RPL3L expression was largely restricted to cardiomyocytes (Fig. 1b, c), with many cardiomyocytes expressing both RPL3L and RPL3 (Fig. 1d, e)32. Similar results were obtained with publicly available scRNA-seq data for the mouse heart (Supplementary Fig. 1b–e)33.
The binding mode of RPL3 was investigated with the three-dimensional (3D) structural model of the human 80S ribosome determined by single-particle cryo‐electron microscopy (cryo-EM) (PDB ID: 6IP5)34. The COOH-terminal region of RPL3 engages in several interactions with RNA helices exposed to the solvent, whereas the NH2-terminal region of the protein is extended toward the core region of the 60S subunit (Fig. 1f, g). The NH2-terminal tip of RPL3 is exposed to the intersubunit cavity and is situated in the vicinity of helix 92 of 28S rRNA, which may affect the amino acid moieties of aminoacyl-tRNAs during their accommodation to the A-site. To compare the structures of RPL3L and RPL3, we obtained a predicted model of RPL3L from the AlphaFold protein structure database and superimposed it on RPL3 in the 80S ribosome (Fig. 1g)35,36. The COOH-terminus of RPL3L is extended by four amino acid residues compared with RPL3, as shown previously20. Although the structural organization of the three fingerlike projections of RPL3 and of RPL3L was similar, several amino acids of RPL3L in these regions differ from those of RPL3 and these amino acids of RPL3L are well conserved among vertebrates (Fig. 1h), suggesting that these local differences between RPL3 and RPL3L may affect the A-tRNA binding pocket of the PTC. However, this issue warrants verification by cryo-EM analysis of RPL3L-ribosomes, given that the structure of RPL3L is only a prediction by AlphaFold.
Impaired cardiac contractility in mice lacking RPL3L-ribosomes
To clarify the physiological role of RPL3L, we generated mice deficient in RPL3 or RPL3L with the use of the CRISPR-Cas9 system, with deletion of exon 2 giving rise to a frameshift mutation in both types of mutant mice (Supplementary Fig. 2a, b). Mating of corresponding heterozygous mutant mice yielded weaned mice with homozygous mutation of Rpl3l (Rpl3l−/−) in approximately the expected Mendelian ratio but no Rpl3 homozygous mutant (Rpl3−/−) mice, suggesting that loss of RPL3 results in embryonic death (Fig. 2a). Reverse transcription (RT) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis of the heart and skeletal muscle confirmed that Rpl3l mRNA was either undetectable for the deleted region or reduced in abundance for the 3’ untranslated region (3’UTR), likely as a result of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (Fig. 2b). Of note, ablation of RPL3L resulted in upregulation of Rpl3 mRNA, suggestive of a compensatory response to the loss of RPL3L function, with similar compensatory expression having previously been described for RPL22 and RPL22L137 . We further confirmed the absence of RPL3L protein in the heart of Rpl3l−/− mice by mass spectrometry (MS)–based multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) (Fig. 2c)38. Given that MRM analysis can measure absolute amounts of proteins, we determined the amounts of individual RPs and normalized them by the average of the amounts of all RPs in order to calculate the number of RP molecules per 80S ribosome. This analysis revealed that RPL3L-ribosomes and RPL3-containing canonical ribosomes were present at a ratio of ~2:1 in the heart of Rpl3l+/+ mice. Loss of RPL3L resulted in an increased protein level for RPL3 in ribosomes, with no significant difference in that for other RPs (Supplementary Fig. 2c). Although RPS15 abundance tended to be increased in the RPL3L-deficient heart relative to the control heart, this difference was not statistically significant. It is also unlikely that the loss of RPL3L would affect the amount of RPS15, given the distance between the two proteins in the 3D structure of the ribosome.
Rpl3l−/− mice manifested no significant difference in body weight or in the weight of the heart or skeletal muscle—including the tibialis anterior (TA), extensor digitorum longus (EDL), gastrocnemius (GC), and soleus (Sol)—compared with Rpl3l+/+ mice (Fig. 2d, e). Histopathologic analysis revealed no obvious changes in myofiber size as determined by wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) staining or in the extent of cardiac fibrosis as visualized by Masson’s trichrome staining in the heart of Rpl3l−/− mice compared with that of control mice (Fig. 2f, g). However, echocardiographic profiles revealed that left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS) and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), both of which are key indicators of cardiac contractility, were significantly reduced by the loss of RPL3L, whereas the left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVDs) was increased and left ventricular wall thickness (LVWT) and the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVDd) were unchanged (Fig. 2h, i, Supplementary Data 1, and Supplementary Movie 1). These results suggested that loss of RPL3L-ribosomes results in reduced cardiac contractility.
We also examined the effects of cardiac pressure overload-induced by angiotensin (Ang) II infusion with a micro–osmotic pump. Cardiac hypertrophy, especially of the left ventricle, was apparent after Ang II infusion, confirming the induction of cardiac pressure overload, but there was no significant difference in the change in heart or LV weight observed in response to Ang II treatment between RPL3L-deficient and control mice (Supplementary Fig. 3a). In addition, whereas LVEF and LVFS were significantly reduced in RPL3L-deficient mice compared with Rpl3l+/+ mice treated with saline, these differences were no longer significant for the mice treated with Ang II (Supplementary Fig. 3b, c, and Supplementary Data 1). These results indicated that the reduced cardiac contractility of mice lacking RPL3L was not exacerbated by pressure overload-induced by Ang II stimulation.
Altered translation elongation dynamics in the RPL3L-deficient heart
To explore the specific role of RPL3L-ribosomes in translation, we performed Ribo-seq analysis with heart lysates from Rpl3l+/+ and Rpl3l−/− mice39. The results revealed high 3–nucleotide (nt) periodicity scores for the Ribo-seq libraries prepared from each genotype (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b)40. No transcripts manifested a significant change in translation efficiency (TE: Ribo-seq reads normalized by RNA-seq reads) in response to the loss of RPL3L (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Data 2). Although the number of ribosome footprints derived from Rpl3l transcripts was reduced, the corresponding RNA abundance was also reduced by almost the same extent, with TE thus remaining unchanged (Fig. 3b).
Despite the lack of significant changes in TE, the RPL3L-ribosome–deficient heart showed delayed translational elongation at codons for Pro and Ala and a slightly increased rate of elongation at codons for Asn and Lys, as indicated by increased ribosomal occupancy for Pro and Ala codons at the A-site and by reduced ribosomal occupancy for Asn and Lys codons at this site, respectively (Fig. 3c, d). Ribosomal occupancy showed similar trends, but to a lesser extent, at the P- and E-sites (Supplementary Fig. 4c, d). At the A-site, ribosome occupancy was increased for all Pro and Ala codons and decreased for all Lys and Asn codons (Fig. 3e). Further analysis with the use of RUST, which reduces the impact of data heterogeneity by a simple normalization method41, confirmed an increase in ribosome occupancy at all Pro and Ala codons, but failed to show a decrease in ribosome occupancy at Lys and Asn codons (Fig. 3f), suggesting that the delayed translational elongation at Pro and Ala codons is a more robust abnormality in the RPL3L-deficient heart.
The rate of translation elongation is not constant even under normal translation conditions, with ribosomes undergoing local acceleration or deceleration to ensure proper translation. An abnormal delay in elongation results in a reduced level of protein synthesis and in ribosome collision, whereas an aberrantly increased rate of elongation prevents proper folding of the nascent protein and results in the formation of protein aggregates29,42,43. We next analyzed the coefficient of variation (CV) for ribosome occupancy to determine whether RPL3L deficiency affects overall translation elongation dynamics. An increased or decreased rate of translation elongation at certain positions would increase the CV of ribosome occupancy at the A-site (Fig. 3g). In contrast, the CV of ribosome occupancy was shown to be decreased in the cerebrum of FMR1-null mice as a result of a widespread reduction in translational pauses44. We observed a significant increase in the CV of ribosome occupancy at the A-site in association with the loss of RPL3L in the heart (Fig. 3h), indicating that RPL3L-ribosomes affect translation elongation dynamics.
Negative correlation of changes in ribosome occupancy induced by loss or overexpression of RPL3L
To further validate the contribution of RPL3L to translation elongation dynamics, we infected mouse C2C12 myoblasts with a retrovirus encoding mouse RPL3 or RPL3L (RPL3 OE and RPL3L OE cells, respectively). Rpl3l mRNA was virtually undetectable in C2C12 cells, and overexpression of RPL3L resulted in downregulation of Rpl3 mRNA (Fig. 4a), an effect opposite to the upregulation apparent in the RPL3L-deficient heart (Fig. 2b). With the use of a primer set targeting the 3’UTR of Rpl3 mRNA, we found that the abundance of endogenous Rpl3 mRNA was also reduced by overexpression of RPL3 (Fig. 4a). In addition, a luciferase reporter assay revealed that Rpl3 promoter activity was suppressed to similar extents in both RPL3 OE and RPL3L OE cells (Supplementary Fig. 5a). These results indicated that RPL3L suppresses the expression level of Rpl3 mRNA, but that this activity is identical for RPL3L and RPL3.
MRM analysis revealed that RPL3L-ribosomes and RPL3-containing canonical ribosomes were present at a ratio of ~3:2 in RPL3L OE cells (Fig. 4b). Ribo-seq analysis of these infected cells revealed marked changes in TE for many transcripts in RPL3L OE cells, whereas the changes were much less pronounced in RPL3 OE cells (Supplementary Fig. 5b and Supplementary Data 3). We also found that overexpression of RPL3L resulted in reduced ribosome occupancy for Pro and Ala codons and increased ribosome occupancy for Lys codons at the A-site (Fig. 4c, d, and Supplementary Fig. 5c), which are opposite changes to those apparent for the RPL3L-deficient heart (Fig. 3c, d). Again, the changes in ribosome occupancy induced by overexpression of RPL3 were much smaller than those resulting from overexpression of RPL3L (Fig. 4c, d, and Supplementary Fig. 5d). The changes in ribosome occupancy at the E- and P-sites were also small for both RPL3 OE and RPL3L OE cells (Supplementary Fig. 5e, f). Of note, the changes in ribosome occupancy at the A-site in RPL3L OE cells showed a marked negative correlation with those in the RPL3L-deficient heart, with no or a less pronounced negative correlation being apparent for the P- and E-sites, respectively (Fig. 4e). Furthermore, no correlation was detected for the changes in ribosome occupancy between RPL3 OE cells and the RPL3L-deficient heart at A-, P-, or E-sites (Fig. 4f). Although overexpression of RPL3 reduced the CV of ribosome occupancy at the A-site relative to that for control cells, overexpression of RPL3L led to a greater such reduction (Fig. 4g). These results thus further confirmed that RPL3L-ribosomes are required for regulation of translation elongation dynamics in the heart.
Whereas forced expression of RPL3L in C2C12 myogenic cells was previously shown to inhibit myoblast fusion and myotube growth19, our Ribo-seq analysis of C2C12 myoblasts was performed under the proliferative condition rather than the differentiation condition. To examine further the effects of RPL3 or RPL3L overexpression under the proliferative condition, we performed gene ontology (GO) analysis of genes upregulated in RPL3L OE cells compared with RPL3 OE cells with the use of RNA-seq data. We found that genes for “regulation of muscle contraction” and “skeletal muscle contraction” were upregulated in RPL3L OE cells relative to RPL3 OE cells (Supplementary Fig. 6a), consistent with the echocardiography results obtained for the RPL3L-deficient heart (Fig. 2i). Of note, genes for “skeletal muscle cell differentiation” were also upregulated in RPL3L OE cells compared with RPL3 OE cells (Supplementary Fig. 6a), which appears inconsistent with the previous finding that overexpression of RPL3L in C2C12 myoblasts inhibited myoblast fusion and myotube growth19. Indeed, we observed significant attenuation of myoblast fusion and myotube growth in RPL3 OE cells compared with control cells, but not in RPL3L OE cells (Supplementary Fig. 6b, c). These results indicated that overexpression of RPL3, but not that of RPL3L, suppresses myoblast differentiation. Overall, our findings with C2C12 myoblasts further corroborated those with RPL3L-deficient mice.
Reduced protein expression associated with aberrant translation elongation dynamics
Although elongation dynamics for the overall transcriptome were affected by the loss of RPL3L, the extent of the effect might vary among transcripts. We therefore analyzed further the fold change in ribosome occupancy at the A-site in the RPL3L-deficient heart. Ribosome occupancy for the 41 Pro codons in 28 genes and the 51 Ala codons in 20 genes was significantly increased compared with the control heart (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Fig. 7, and Supplementary Data 4). Metagene plot analysis of the Ribo-seq data confirmed the accumulation of footprint reads around Pro and Ala codons for genes with significantly increased ribosome occupancy at the A-site for such codons (Fig. 5b).
To clarify the function of such genes, we performed GO terminology analysis, which revealed enrichment of terms related to cardiac muscle contraction and mitochondrial ATP synthesis (Fig. 5c). For example, both Myl4 (which encodes a myosin light chain) and Atp5o (which encodes a subunit of the mitochondrial F1 complex for ATP synthesis) showed altered translation elongation dynamics in response to the loss of RPL3L (Fig. 5d). We therefore performed quantitative proteomics analysis by MS with data-independent acquisition (DIA) to investigate whether the abnormal elongation dynamics for the identified genes affected the abundance of the corresponding proteins. The RPL3L-deficient heart showed reduced protein levels for genes with delayed translation elongation at Pro/Ala codons (Fig. 5e and Supplementary Data 5). These results suggested that certain genes are susceptible to regulation of translational dynamics by RPL3L-ribosomes and that the encoded proteins are more efficiently produced by such ribosomes.
Abundance and charge status of tRNAs and m6A status of mRNAs in the RPL3L-deficient heart
Given that tRNA status is also a key determinant of translation elongation, we next analyzed the abundance and aminoacylation status of tRNAs by Charged DM-tRNA-seq45. We detected a decrease in the amount of tRNA-Pro-CGG and an increase in that of tRNA-Pro-TGG, whereas the amounts of other tRNAs remained unchanged, in the RPL3L-deficient heart compared with the control heart (Fig. 6a, b, and Supplementary Data 6). The rate of aminoacylation of all tRNAs, as well as the protein levels of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, were not altered in the RPL3L-deficient heart (Fig. 6c, d, and Supplementary Data 6). These results suggested that the delay in translation elongation at the CCG codon induced by the loss of RPL3L was attributable in part to a decrease in the abundance of tRNA-Pro-CGG, whereas the delay at other Pro and Ala codons was independent of the amount or aminoacylation status of tRNAs.
Given that N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification in the coding region alters the secondary structure of certain mRNAs and reduces ribosomal pausing46, we also performed m6A-seq for the RPL3L-deficient and control heart. No significant change in the ratio of m6A for all transcripts (Fig. 6e, f, and Supplementary Data 7) or in the abundance of proteins encoded by m6A-positive mRNAs (Fig. 6g) was apparent for the RPL3L-deficient heart compared with the control heart, suggesting that m6A status is not likely a major determinant of the altered translation dynamics induced by the loss of RPL3L in the heart.
RPL3L-ribosomes are less prone to collisions
Prolonged translational pausing gives rise to ribosome collision and the accumulation of truncated nascent proteins, which are toxic and therefore degraded by the ribosome-associated quality control (RQC) pathway47,48. The collision of stalled ribosomes with subsequent ribosomes results in the formation of diribosomes (disomes), which are recognized by the RQC pathway, resulting in their dissociation and degradation of the truncated nascent proteins. Given that loss of RPL3L was found to affect translation elongation dynamics, we next evaluated collisions of RPL3L-ribosomes by disome profiling (Disome-seq) of the RPL3L-deficient and control mouse heart49,50. A total of 722 disome peaks was identified in the RPL3L-deficient and control heart, with most of these peaks (652 peaks) being commonly detected and 25 and 45 peaks detected specifically in the control and RPL3L-deficient heart, respectively (Fig. 7a). Of the 92 Pro/Ala codons that showed delayed translation elongation in the RPL3L-deficient heart, 39 codons were associated with disome peaks (Fig. 7b).
Given the large number of disome peaks in addition to those associated with the 39 Pro/Ala codons (Fig. 7b), we next examined the contribution of RPL3L-ribosomes to overall collisions. In the region of disome peaks, an increase in disome footprint reads was observed in association with the loss of RPL3L-ribosomes (Fig. 7c and Supplementary Data 8). GO term analysis revealed that the genes with the disome peaks also showed enrichment for terms related to mitochondrial ATP synthesis and cardiac muscle contraction (Fig. 7d). In addition, protein expression for such genes was reduced in the RPL3L-deficient heart compared with the control heart (Fig. 7e). These results indicated that RPL3L-ribosomes influence translation elongation dynamics not only at Pro/Ala codons but also at collision-prone sites in the heart.
Decreased expression of proteins related to cardiac muscle contraction in the RPL3L-deficient heart
Given the defects in cardiac contractility in RPL3L-defiient mice (Fig. 2), we focused genes related to cardiac muscle contraction. The group of genes with the GO term “cardiac muscle contraction” (n = 46) was further explored together with those for the categories of “dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM)−related genes”51 (n = 33), “genes with differential ribosome occupancy at Pro/Ala codons in the heart of Rpl3l+/+ or Rpl3l−/− mice (Pro/Ala)” (n = 44), and “genes with disome peaks in the heart of Rpl3l+/+ or Rpl3l−/− mice (disome-positive)” (n = 198). A Venn diagram shows the overlap of these four groups of genes (Fig. 8a). About one-third of the genes in the “cardiac muscle contraction” group were included in the “disome-positive” group (n = 14), with these overlapping genes also including genes in the “Pro/Ala” group (n = 5). These 14 genes included those for cardiac α-actin (ACTC1) and cardiac myosins (MYH6, MYH7, MYL2, MYL3, and MYL4), which align to form sarcomeres; the tropomyosin α1 chain (TPM1); the three troponin subunits (TNNC1, TNNI3, and TNNT2); MYBPC3, a protein that binds to actin and myosin and enhances cardiac contractility52; TCAP, a protein that cross-links Titin, a filamentous protein with springlike properties in the I-band region, to the Z-disc53; CSRP3, a scaffold protein involved in multiple protein-protein interactions within the Z-disc54; and CASQ2, a calcium-binding protein that localizes to the sarcoplasmic reticulum to store calcium55. In addition, the overlap between DCM-related and disome-positive genes included LDB3, which encodes a PDZ-LIM domain–binding factor that provides structural stability to the Z-disc56. The cumulative fraction for the fold change in protein abundance in the Rpl3l−/− mouse heart compared with the control mouse heart (Fig. 8b) revealed that the abundance of proteins encoded by these 15 genes (enclosed by the red boundaries in Fig. 8a, although only 12 of the proteins were detected by MS) was significantly (P = 3.03 × 10−5) reduced in the heart of Rpl3l−/− mice relative to that of all proteins (n = 3376). These results suggested that downregulation of these gene products is likely responsible for the cardiac contraction defect in Rpl3l−/− mice.
A similar analysis was performed for nuclear genes that encode components of the oxidative phosphorylation complexes in the inner mitochondrial membrane that are responsible for ATP production (n = 91). The protein subunits of these complexes are encoded by the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes, with the corresponding transcripts being translated by cytoplasmic ribosomes (including RPL3L-ribosomes) and mitochondrial ribosomes, respectively. Many of these genes in the nuclear genome were also associated with delayed translation elongation at Pro/Ala codons or disome peaks (Fig. 8c). Although the encoded proteins did not show a significant decrease in expression in the RPL3L-deficient heart relative to all proteins, they showed a slightly decreased abundance (Fig. 8d).
Collectively, these results suggested that a reduced abundance of proteins related to cardiac muscle contraction, rather than of proteins in the mitochondrial respiratory chain, is likely responsible for the impaired cardiac contractility observed in RPL3L-deficient mice.
Discussion
We have here characterized the function of RPL3L, a striated muscle−specific RP paralog whose overall structure is similar to that of the canonical, ubiquitously expressed RPL3. We now show that RPL3L-ribosomes contribute to the regulation of translation elongation dynamics, in particular at Ala/Pro codons and at collision-prone sites. RPL3L-ribosomes appear to influence translation of the overall transcriptome, but they especially affect that of transcripts of genes related to cardiac muscle contraction and dilated cardiomyopathy. These properties of RPL3L-ribosomes result in increased production of proteins from these transcripts and thereby play a key role in the regulation of cardiac function. Of note, although all analyses of the heart were performed with male mice, C2C12 myoblasts are derived from a female mouse, suggesting that the effect of RPL3L-ribosomes on translation elongation is independent of sex.
Recent studies have shown that protein quantity and quality are perturbed not only by defects in translation initiation, but also by aberrant dynamics of translation elongation42. For example, ribosome collisions have been found to increase with age and to contribute to age-associated proteostasis defects in Caenorhabditis elegans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae57. In addition, polyglutamine expansion in the protein huntingtin inhibits ribosomal translocation during translation elongation, leading to increased ribosome collisions and decreased protein synthesis58. Furthermore, RPL39L, which is specifically expressed in sperm, was recently shown to contribute to cell type‐specific regulation of translation elongation59. RPL39L is located in the exit tunnel for nascent proteins, and the exit tunnel of RPL39L-containing ribosomes differs from that of RPL39-containing ribosomes in both size and charge state. RPL39L-containing ribosomes influence the cotranslational folding of a subset of male germ cell‐specific proteins essential for spermatogenesis, and ablation of RPL39L resulted in increased protein aggregation associated with the abnormal folding of such proteins, rendering male mice infertile. These various observations indicate that translation elongation is key to maintenance of protein quantity and quality. The present study of RPL3L-ribosomes also shows the physiological importance of the regulation of translation elongation. However, given the importance of translation initiation to the global translation level, it is possible that the loss of RPL3L also affects translation initiation by some unknown mechanism, a possibility that needs to be examined in future studies.
The NH2-terminal extension, W finger, and basic thumb of RPL3 and RPL3L are located close to the A-tRNA binding pocket of the PTC. In S. cerevisiae, mutations in these regions of Rpl3 affect peptidyl transferase activity27. Crystallographic analysis has shown that the W255C mutation disrupts the 25S rRNA region comprising nucleotides A2872 to U2875, which forms the A-tRNA binding pocket of the PTC26. Whereas increased flexibility of this region conferred by this mutation would be expected to facilitate aminoacyl-tRNA entry into the PTC, it also reduces the precision of amino acid positioning at the A-site, resulting in a reduced efficiency of peptidyl transfer. In addition, His243 of Rpl3 is methylated by Hpm1 in S. cerevisiae, and loss of this methylation affects translation elongation and fidelity60,61. METTL18, an ortholog of Hpm1, methylates His245 (the equivalent residue of His243 in yeast Rpl3) of RPL3 in humans28. This methylation delays translation elongation at Tyr codons, with this delay being required for the proper folding of nascent proteins, and defective methylation results in an increased rate of elongation and in aggregation of Tyr-rich proteins29. Given that RPL3L differs from RPL3 at some amino acid positions near the A-tRNA binding pocket and that these amino acid differences are evolutionarily conserved among RPL3L proteins, the change in translation elongation dynamics induced by RPL3L loss may be attributable to structural differences around the A-tRNA binding pocket between RPL3L-ribosomes and canonical ribosomes. In addition, given the difference in elongation efficiency depending on the incorporated amino acid in the RPL3L-deficient heart, RPL3L may also affect the tunnel entrance for the nascent peptide. Further detailed biochemical and structural analyses are warranted to characterize the actual structure of RPL3L-ribosomes and to determine how such structural differences affect translation elongation dynamics.
A recent study of RPL3L-deficient mice by Milenkovic and coauthors have reported results that differ substantially from ours20. This previous study thus did not reveal impaired cardiac contractility in the mutant mice. We analyzed the echocardiographic profiles of 18 to 21-week-old mice as well as of 20 to 27-week-old mice in the case of the pressure overload experiments, whereas 8-week-old mice were subjected to such analysis in the previous study, suggesting that a difference in age may explain the difference in results. In addition, Grimes and coauthors have recently generated RPL3L-deficient mice and found that the heart of 18-month-old mutant mice is significantly smaller than that of controls without apparent defects in cardiac contraction62. The C57BL/6NTac substrain was used in the analysis by Grimes et al., whereas the C57BL/6 J substrain was applied in the analysis by Milenkovic et al. as well as by us, suggesting that this genetic difference may be responsible for the differences in cardiac phenotypes. Milenkovic et al. showed that loss of RPL3L increased ribosome-mitochondria interactions with elevated mitochondrial activity, but Grimes et al. failed to detect any defects in ribosome localization, ultrastructure, or mitochondrial function in the cardiac muscle of RPL3L-deficient mice.
Milenkovic and coauthors also performed Ribo-seq analysis for the heart of 8-week-old RPL3L-deficient mice without finding a difference in ribosome occupancy at the A-site, whereas we did find such a difference in the heart of RPL3L-deficient mice at 10 weeks of age. The age difference between the two studies in this case was negligible, leaving the reason for the difference in the results unclear. Although ribosomes are highly sensitive to stress during tissue extraction and high-quality data are required for ribosome occupancy analysis, our Ribo-seq data showed high 3-nt periodicity. Delayed translation elongation at Pro/Ala codons in the RPL3L-deficient heart was also reproducibly observed with both our algorithm and the RUST algorithm, and the translation dynamics in C2C12 cells stably expressing RPL3L were highly inversely correlated with those in the RPL3L-deficient heart, whereas no substantial change in ribosome occupancy at Pro/Ala codons was apparent in C2C12 cells overexpressing RPL3. Moreover, we detected reduced protein levels in the RPL3L-deficient heart for genes with delayed elongation at Pro/Ala codons and for genes prone to ribosome collisions. This consistency of our results is indicative of their reliability.
Although mutations in the RPL3L gene have been identified in patients with atrial fibrillation or pediatric dilated cardiomyopathy21–25, our analysis of RPL3L-deficient mice did not reveal such pronounced abnormalities even under the pressure overload condition, possibly because of other species differences or interactions with other genes. Elucidation of the specific functions of RPL3L-ribosomes may lead to the development of therapeutic interventions for such diseases.
Methods
Animals
All animal experiments were approved by the animal ethics committee of Kyushu University (A20-169-0, A21-271-0, and A22-013-0) and were conducted in compliance with the university guidelines and regulations for animal experimentation. For generation of Rpl3–/– and Rpl3l–/– mice, ribonucleoprotein was prepared by mixing the CRISPR RNA (crRNA) and transactivating crRNA (tracrRNA) with recombinant Cas9 protein (Integrated DNA Technologies) (Supplementary Data 9). Mouse zygotes of the C57BL/6 J strain were subjected to electroporation with each ribonucleoprotein complex. All mice were housed in the specific pathogen-free animal facility at Kyushu University in accordance with institutional guidelines under the following conditions: ambient temperature of 22 °C, 50% to 60% humidity, 12 h-dark/12 h-light cycle, and free access to water and rodent chow CA-1 (CLEA Japan). Male mice were used for all experiments, given that male mice are commonly used for cardiac analysis. Mice were euthanized in a CO2 chamber for experiments.
Cell lines and culture conditions
HEK293T (CRL-11268) and C2C12 (CRL-1772) cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection and were checked for mycoplasma contamination with the use of MycoAlert (Lonza). The cells were cultured under an atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies) and antibiotics.
Retrovirus expression system
Mouse RPL3 and RPL3L cDNAs were subcloned into pCX4/puro (kindly provided by T. Akagi), and the resulting constructs together with pGP (Takara) and pE-eco (Takara) were introduced into HEK293T cells with the use of the FuGENE6 reagent (Roche). Culture supernatants containing recombinant ecotropic retroviruses were harvested and used to infect C2C12 cells by incubation for 24 h in the presence of polybrene (2 μg/ml). The cells were then subjected to selection for 48 h in medium containing puromycin (2.5 μg/ml) and were maintained at low confluence.
RT-qPCR analysis
Total RNA was extracted from tissue or cell lysates with the use of a PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and was subjected to RT with the use of a QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen). The resulting cDNA was subjected to real-time PCR analysis with specific primers (Supplementary Data 9) and with the use of Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix (New England BioLabs) and a StepOnePlus Real-Time system (Applied Biosystems). The amount of target mRNAs was normalized by that of β-actin mRNA.
Luciferase reporter assay
A DNA sequence encoding the promoter region of mouse Rpl3 (from the transcription start site to 1.2 kbp upstream) was cloned into the pGL2-basic vector (Promega), and the resulting construct together with pRL CMV (Promega) was introduced into C2C12 cells with the use of the FuGENE HD Transfection Reagent (Promega). After transfection for 2 days, luciferase activities were assayed with the use of a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) and Lumat LB 9510 Tube Luminometer (Berthold Technologies).
Induction of myoblast differentiation into myotubes
C2C12 cells were transferred to 24-well plates and cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum to full confluence. The medium was then replaced with DMEM supplemented with 2% horse serum, and the cells were cultured for 4 days to induce myoblast to myotube differentiation. The cells were fixed with 4% formalin, incubated for 1 h at room temperature with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 0.2% Triton X-100, and then incubated overnight at 4 °C with a monoclonal antibody to myosin (skeletal, fast) (clone MY-32, M7246, Sigma, 1:250 dilution) in IF buffer (PBS containing 1% BSA and 0.3% Triton X-100). They were washed three times with PBS, incubated for 1 h at room temperature with Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated secondary antibodies (A-11029, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 1:1000 dilution) in IF buffer, and mounted with the use of Vectashield Hard Set Mounting Medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories) for observation with a Zeiss LSM700 microscope. Quantification of myotube diameter and myogenic fusion was performed with the use of ImageJ. The fusion index was calculated as the number of nuclei in myosin-positive myotubes divided by the total number of nuclei.
Histopathologic analysis
Tissue was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned with a cryostat at a thickness of 3 µm. For analysis of fibrosis, sections were subjected to Masson’s trichrome staining and examined with a BZ-X700 microscope (Keyence). For analysis of myofiber size, sections were stained with 5 µg/mL Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated WGA (Thermo Fisher Scientific), mounted with the use of Vectashield Hard Set Mounting Medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories), and observed with a BZ-X700 microscope.
Echocardiography
Mice at 18 to 21 weeks of age were subjected to light anesthesia with 1% to 2% isoflurane before echocardiography. For pressure overload experiments, Ang II (1.44 mg/kg per day, Sigma Aldrich) or saline was continuously infused into mice at 20 to 27 weeks of age with the use of a micro–osmotic pump (model 1007D, Alzet) for 1 week. Two-dimensional targeted M-mode images were obtained from the short-axis view at the papillary muscle level with a Vevo 2100 ultrasonography system (Visual Sonics). LVEF was calculated according to the formula: LVEF=[(diastolic LV volume – systolic LV volume)/diastolic LV volume] ×100, where LV volume=[7.0/(2.4 + LV diameter)] × (LV diameter)3. LVWT was calculated as the average of interventricular septum thickness and posterior wall thickness. E, A, the E/A ratio, and deceleration time (DcT) were determined by measurement of flow velocities across the mitral valve by pulsed Doppler imaging. Tissue Doppler was used to measure the mitral annular plane velocity (E’ and A’). After echocardiography, mice were euthanized and their tissues weighed.
Measurement of blood pressure and heart rate
Blood pressure and heart rate were measured in mice with a noninvasive tail-cuff system (model MK-1030 NIBP Monitor for Rats & Mice) as previously described63.
Structure prediction
Models of the human 80S ribosome (PDB ID: 6IP5) and A-tRNA (PDB ID: 4V5D) were obtained from the Protein Data Bank34. The RPL3-highlighted graphical representation (Fig. 1f) was produced with the use of UCSF ChimeraX software64. The predicted model of human RPL3L was obtained from the AlphaFold protein structure database (Identifier: AF-Q92910-F1) and was superimposed onto RPL3 in the 80S ribosome with the use of UCSF ChimeraX.
Sample preparation for DIA and MRM analysis as well as for Ribo-seq and Disome-seq
C2C12 cells were lysed with a lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1% Triton X-100, and EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma Aldrich)) supplemented with cycloheximide (100 μg/ml). The heart of Rpl3l–/– or Rpl3l+/+ mice at 10 weeks of age was flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and lysed in the same solution with the use of a Multi Beads Shocker device (Yasui Kikai). The cell and tissue lysates were centrifuged at 20,380 × g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the resulting supernatants were collected for DIA-based MS analysis as well as for Ribo-seq and Disome-seq, or were loaded on a 1 M sucrose cushion (containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and cycloheximide (100 μg/ml)) for preparation of a polysome fraction. The gradient was centrifuged at 100,000 rpm (417,200 × g) for 1 h at 4 °C in a Beckman TLA110 rotor, and the resulting pellet (polysome fraction) was suspended in Triton lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, 4 mM sodium orthovanadate, 4 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaF, 100 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and subjected to MRM analysis.
DIA analysis
Protein concentration of the lysate supernatants was adjusted to 1 mg/ml, and cysteine residues were reduced with 2.5 mM tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 30 min at 37 °C and alkylated with 5 mM 2-iodoacetamide (Sigma Aldrich) for 30 min at room temperature. Proteins were precipitated with acetone, dispersed by ultrasonic treatment in 25 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate, and digested with trypsin (Laurus Bio). The resulting peptides were purified with the use of an SDB-XC-StageTip (3 M), injected (200 ng/sample) into a pre-column (L-column2 micro, CERI), and fractionated on an in-house–fabricated 20 cm column packed with 2 µm octadecyl silane particles (CERI). Elution was performed with a linear gradient of 5% to 35% solvent B over 70 min at a flow rate of 200 nl/min (solvent A = 0.1% formic acid; solvent B = 0.1% formic acid and 99.9% acetonitrile) and with the use of a Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Eluted peptides were sprayed with a nano-electrospray source and with a column oven set at 42 °C (AMR). The Q Exactive Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was operated in DIA mode. All data were acquired in profile mode with positive polarity. MS1 spectra were collected in the mass/charge (m/z) ratio range of 430 to 860 at a resolution of 35,000 with an automated gain control (AGC) target value of 1 × 106 and a maximum injection time of 50 ms. MS2 spectra were collected in the m/z range of >200 at a resolution of 17,500 with an AGC target value of 1 × 106 and with the automatic maximum ion injection time. Twenty-one DIA windows of 20 units were set from an m/z of 430 to 850 with an overlap of 1 unit. Normalized collision energy was set to 25%. All DIA raw data were processed with DIA-NN (version 1.8.1) in the library-free search mode with reference to mouse UniProt sequences with the addition of RPL3L (UniProt accession: E9PWZ3)65.
MRM analysis
For production of internal standard peptides for MRM analysis, pENTR2B vectors (Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing target peptide sequences, which were concatenated into several synthetic artificial protein sequences, were produced by Eurofins Genomics (Supplementary Data 10) and were then subjected to recombination with the pET21b-QcodeAA-DEST vector with the use of Gateway LR Clonase II Enzyme Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Recombinant proteins were expressed in an Escherichia coli expression strain that was auxotrophic for arginine and lysine and grown in the presence of [13C6/15N4]Arg and [13C6/15N2]Lys, and were subsequently purified with the use of Ni-resin (Probond, Invitrogen). The protein concentration of the samples and internal standard peptides was determined with the BCA assay (Bio-Rad). Cysteine residues were blocked by incubation of the samples with 2 mM tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride for 30 min at 37 °C and then alkylated with 10 mM 2-iodoacetamide for 30 min at room temperature. The samples were then digested with trypsin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 5 μg/ml for 14 h at 37 °C. MRM analysis was performed with a QTRAP5500 instrument (SCIEX) operated in positive-ion mode. Typical parameters were set as follows: spray voltage of 2300 V, curtain gas setting of 10, collision gas setting of high, ion source gas 1 setting of 30, and interface heater temperature of 160 °C. Collision energy (CE) was calculated with the following formulas: CE = (0.044 × m/z1) + 5.5 and CE = (0.051 × m/z1) + 0.5 for doubly and triply charged precursor ions, respectively, and where m/z1 is the mass/charge ratio for the precursor ion. The collision cell exit potential (CXP) was calculated according to the formula: CXP = (0.0391 × m/z2)– 2.2334, where m/z2 is the mass/charge ratio for the fragment ion. The declustering potential (DP) was set to 50, and the entrance potential (EP) was set to 10. Resolution for Q1 and Q3 was set to “unit” (half-maximal peak width of 0.7 Da). The scheduled MRM option was adopted for all data acquisition, with a target scan time of 6.7s and MRM detection windows of 300s for verification of MRM assays. Raw data were analyzed by iMPAQT-Quant with the corresponding spectral library. Peak groups were scored on the basis of cosine similarity with the MS/MS spectra obtained in data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode, a peak coelution of at least three fragment ions for each peptide, the presence or absence of interfering ions, and intensity. Finally, all traces were manually checked to eliminate inadequate transitions. Artificial protein sequences and corresponding MRM assays are listed in Supplementary Data 11.
Ribo-seq and Disome-seq
Cell and tissue lysate supernatants were assayed for RNA concentration with a Qubit RNA BR Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), incubated with RNase I (20 U per 10 μg of RNA, Epicentre) for 45 min at 25 °C, and placed on ice before the addition of SUPERase•In RNase inhibitor (Invitrogen) to a concentration of 20 U/ml. The samples were then loaded on a 1 M sucrose cushion (containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, SUPERase•In (10 U/ml), 1 mM dithiothreitol, and cycloheximide (100 μg/ml)), and the gradients were centrifuged at 100,000 rpm (417,200 × g) for 1 h at 4 °C in a Beckman TLA110 rotor. The resulting pellets were suspended in ribosome splitting buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 300 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, SUPERase•In (10 U/ml), 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1% Triton X-100) and subjected to purification with the use of an Amicon Ultra filtration device (100-kDa cutoff, Millipore) to deplete rRNAs. The purified RNA was subjected to selection on the basis of a size range of 17 to 34 nt for Ribo-seq and 50 to 80 nt for Disome-seq by electrophoresis through a 15% polyacrylamide and Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE)–urea gel (SuperSep RNA, Fujifilm). The footprint fragments were treated with T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England BioLabs) to repair 2’−3’ cyclic phosphates, and a DNA linker including barcode sequences (NI-810 to NI-817) (Supplementary Data 9) was ligated with the use of T4 RNA ligase 2, truncated K227Q (New England BioLabs). The resulting products were purified on a 15% polyacrylamide and TBE-urea gel, and rRNAs were further depleted with the use of RiboZero Gold (Illumina). RT was performed with the NI-802 primer (Supplementary Data 9), and the resulting products were purified on a 15% polyacrylamide and TBE-urea gel. The purified cDNAs were circularized with circLigase II (Lucigen), and index sequences were then added by PCR amplification with the common primer NI-798 and primers including index sequences (NI-799 and NI-822 to NI-826).(Supplementary Data 9). Products of the desired size were purified on a 15% polyacrylamide nondenaturing gel (SuperSep DNA, Fujifilm), and the libraries were sequenced with a NovaSeq 6000 system (Illumina).
RNA-seq
Total RNA was extracted from tissue or cell lysates with the use of a PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and the quality of the purified RNA was assessed with a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent). After mRNA selection with the use of a NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (New England BioLabs), libraries were prepared with the use of a NEBNext Ultra Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England BioLabs). The cDNAs were sequenced with a NovaSeq 6000 system.
Charged DM-tRNA-seq
Charged DM-tRNA-seq was performed as previously described45. Periodic oxidation of 10 μg of total RNA extracted from mouse heart was performed for 30 min at room temperature in a solution containing 100 mM acetic acid/sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.8) and 50 mM NaIO4. Glucose (1 M solution) was then added to a final concentration of 100 mM, the mixture was incubated for 5 min at room temperature, and RNA was purified with the use of a Micro Bio-Spin P-6 Column (Bio-Rad). The RNA was treated with 60 mM sodium borate (pH 9.5) for 90 min at 45 °C for deacylation and purified again with a Micro Bio-Spin P-6 Column. The purified RNA was selected according to size in the range of 70 to 90 nt by electrophoresis through a 15% polyacrylamide and TBE-urea gel, and then demethylated with the demethylase supplied with an rtStar tRNA-Optimized First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Filgen). The resulting sample was subjected to dephosphorylation, DNA linker ligation, and rRNA depletion with RiboZero Gold as described for the Ribo-seq protocol. RT was performed with the SI-019 primer, and the resulting products were purified on a 15% polyacrylamide and TBE-urea gel. The second linker (SI-018) was ligated by incubation overnight at 25 °C with T4 RNA Ligase 1 (ssRNA Ligase), High Concentration (New England BioLabs). The products were then amplified by PCR with the same primers as used for the Ribo-seq protocol, and those of the desired size were purified by electrophoresis through a 15% polyacrylamide nondenaturing gel. The libraries were sequenced with a NovaSeq 6000 system (Illumina).
m6A-seq
m6A-seq libraries were prepared with the use of an EpiNext CUT&RUN RNA m6A-Seq Kit (EpiGentek). In brief, total RNA (5 µg) extracted from mouse heart was subjected to immunoprecipitation with the m6A antibody (P-9016, EpiGentek, 1:100 dilution) and cleaved on beads. The beads were then washed, RNA was purified from the beads and subjected to RT, and the resulting cDNA was amplified by PCR. The libraries were sequenced with a NovaSeq 6000 system (Illumina).
Read processing and analysis for Ribo-seq and Disome-seq
Adaptor sequences were trimmed from raw reads with the use of cutadapt. Reads of low quality were discarded with the use of fastq_quality_trimmer and fastq_quality_filter of the FASTX-Toolkit. Ribosomal RNA reads were removed by alignment with mouse rRNA sequences with the use of STAR, and the remaining reads were aligned with the mouse transcriptome (GRCm38.p6) and mouse genome (mm10) also with the use of STAR. Multiple mappings were allowed. Aligned reads were sorted and indexed with the use of Samtools. UMI deduplication was performed with the use of UMI-tools. The A-site was defined as the position located 15 nt from the start of reads for 28- to 30-nt reads that showed 3-nt periodicity. Three-nucleotide periodicity was analyzed with RiboCode and RibORF, and footprints with a score of ≥0.5 were applied to the analysis. Although Ribo-seq libraries were prepared with footprints of 17 to 34 nt, given that footprints derived from ribosomes with open A-sites are 20 to 22 nt in length66, 20- to 22-nt footprints were excluded from the analysis because most of them failed to show 3-nt periodicity in the libraries generated in this study. Reads mapped to the mouse transcriptome were counted with the use of featureCounts (Subread package). The first and last five codons were excluded from the analysis to avoid the atypical footprint counts observed around start and stop codons67,68. Ribosome occupancy was calculated as the average of the normalized read counts (RPM) corresponding to the positions of the E-, P-, and A-sites, and was further corrected by the average of the total codon RPMs to obtain the relative ribosome occupancy. Codon-specific dwell times were also calculated with the use of RUST41.
Read processing and analysis for charged DM-tRNA-seq
Adaptor sequences were trimmed from raw reads with the use of cutadapt. The remaining reads were aligned to the reference tRNA sequences obtained from GtRNAdb with the use of the python script “Reference Sequence Alignment.py,” and read count and aminoacylation ratios were determined with the use of the python script “creating output from sequence_alignments.py.” These python scripts were downloaded from https://github.com/Jessica-Pan/DM-tRNA-seq-ref-genomes.
Read processing and analysis for m6A-seq
Adaptor trimming, quality filtering, depletion of rRNA reads, and read mapping were performed as described for Ribo-seq and Disome-seq. Multiple mappings were allowed. Peak calling was performed with the use of HOMER findPeaks. The number of reads was determined with the use of bedtools for the peak on the coding region commonly identified in three replicates for each of the Rpl3l+/+ and Rpl3l–/– samples.
scRNA-seq analysis
Analysis of published scRNA-seq data was performed with the use of the R package Seurat or Scanpy (v1.9.1). For analysis of scRNA-seq data from human heart, the processed R object file was downloaded from GSE183852. For analysis of scRNA-seq data from mouse heart, the gene expression matrix data were downloaded from Tabula Muris.
Statistical analysis
DESeq2 was applied to analyze differential expression based on RNA-seq and Ribo-seq reads69, and the generalized linear model in RiboDiff was used to analyze differential TE70. GO analysis and EASE score calculation were performed by DAVID. Spearman’s correlation with associated P value was calculated in Python 3.6.8 with the use of Pandas (v0.25.3). Student’s t test and the Mann-Whitney U test were performed in Python 3.6.8 with the use of Scipy (v1.2.1). The Steel-Dwass test was performed in scikit-posthocs (v0.6.7). Welch’s t test was performed with the use of Microsoft Excel, and Dunnett’s test and the Tukey-Kramer test with JMP16. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. For extraction of differentially expressed genes, we used an adjusted P value (false discovery rate (FDR) q value) of <0.05.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank L. Cui and the Research Promotion Unit of the Medical Institute of Bioregulation at Kyushu University for technical assistance, C. Kikutake for advice on statistical analysis, as well as A. Ohta for help with preparation of the manuscript. Computations were performed in part on the NIG supercomputer at ROIS National Institute of Genetics. This research was supported in part by KAKENHI grants from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan to A.M. (JP20H05928) and to K.I.N. (JP18H05215), as well as by a grant from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (21wm0425002) to K.I.N.
Source data
Author contributions
C.S. performed experiments and wrote the manuscript. A.M. conceived and designed the project, performed experiments, and wrote the manuscript. K.I. performed computational analysis and wrote the manuscript. T.Ya. performed echocardiography experiments. T.Y. performed structure analysis. T.M. performed library preparation. A.H. and M.M. performed MS experiments. Y.T., E.M.-S., S.I., S.M., and H.T. supervised experimental design. K.I.N. coordinated the study and wrote the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Pavel Baranov and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Data availability
All sequence data have been deposited in GEO under the accession number GSE203072. The MS data have been deposited with the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the JPOST partner repository under the data set identifiers PXD034018 and PXD034019. Structural data for human 80S ribosome (PDB ID: 6IP5 and A-tRNA (PDB ID: 4V5D were obtained from the Protein Data Bank. The predicted model of human RPL3L was obtained from the AlphaFold protein structure database (Identifier: AF-Q92910-F1). Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
All custom Python scripts used in the analyses of this paper are available on request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Chisa Shiraishi, Akinobu Matsumoto.
Contributor Information
Akinobu Matsumoto, Email: akinobu@bioreg.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
Keiichi I. Nakayama, Email: nakayak1@bioreg.kyushu-u.ac.jp
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-023-37838-6.
References
- 1.Thomson E, Ferreira-Cerca S, Hurt E. Eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2013;126:4815–4821. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Genuth NR, Barna M. The discovery of ribosome heterogeneity and its implications for gene regulation and organismal life. Mol. Cell. 2018;71:364–374. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.07.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Li D, Wang JL. Ribosome heterogeneity in stem cells and development. J. Cell Biol. 2020;219:e202001108. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202001108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Norris K, Hopes T, Aspden JL. Ribosome heterogeneity and specialization in development. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Rna. 2021;12:e1644. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gay DM, Lund AH, Jansson MD. Translational control through ribosome heterogeneity and functional specialization. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2022;47:66–81. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2021.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Komili S, Farny NG, Roth FP, Silver PA. Functional specificity among ribosomal proteins regulates gene expression. Cell. 2007;131:557–571. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shi Z, et al. Heterogeneous ribosomes preferentially translate distinct subpools of mRNAs genome-wide. Mol. Cell. 2017;67:71–83. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Imami K, et al. Phosphorylation of the ribosomal protein RPL12/uL11 affects translation during mitosis. Mol. Cell. 2018;72:84–98. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gerst JE. Pimp my ribosome: Ribosomal protein paralogs specify translational control. Trends Genet. 2018;34:832–845. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2018.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lopes AM, et al. The human RPS4 paralogue on Yq11.223 encodes a structurally conserved ribosomal protein and is preferentially expressed during spermatogenesis. BMC Mol. Biol. 2010;11:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-11-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nadano D, Notsu T, Matsuda T, Sato TA. A human gene encoding a protein homologous to ribosomal protein L39 is normally expressed in the testis and derepressed in multiple cancer cells. Biochim. Biophy. Acta. 2002;1577:430–436. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4781(02)00445-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sugihara Y, et al. Proteomic analysis of rodent ribosomes revealed heterogeneity including ribosomal proteins L10-like, L22-like 1, and L39-like. J. Proteome Res. 2010;9:1351–1366. doi: 10.1021/pr9008964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Guimaraes JC, Zavolan M. Patterns of ribosomal protein expression specify normal and malignant human cells. Genome Biol. 2016;17:236. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1104-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gupta V, Warner JR. Ribosome-omics of the human ribosome. RNA. 2014;20:1004–1013. doi: 10.1261/rna.043653.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Turner JMA. Meiotic silencing in mammals. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2015;49:395–412. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-112414-055145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jiang L, et al. RPL10L Is Required for male meiotic division by compensating for RPL10 during meiotic sex chromosome inactivation in mice. Curr. Biol. 2017;27:1498–1505. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zou QX, et al. Proteostasis regulated by testis-specific ribosomal protein RPL39L maintains mouse spermatogenesis. iScience. 2021;24:103396. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.VanRaay TJ, Connors TD, Klinger KW, Landes GM, Burn TC. A novel ribosomal protein L3-like gene (RPL3L) maps to the autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease gene region. Genomics. 1996;37:172–176. doi: 10.1006/geno.1996.0538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chaillou T, Zhang XP, McCarthy JJ. Expression of muscle-specific ribosomal protein L3-like impairs myotube growth. J. Cell. Physiol. 2016;231:1894–1902. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Milenkovic, I. et al. Dynamic interplay between RPL3- and RPL3L-containing ribosomes modulates mitochondrial activity in the mammalian heart. Nucleic Acids Res. gkad121, 10.1093/nar/gkad121, (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 21.Thorolfsdottir RB, et al. Coding variants in RPL3L and MYZAP increase risk of atrial fibrillation. Commun. Biol. 2018;1:68. doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0068-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Weng LC, et al. Genetic determinants of electrocardiographic P-wave duration and relation to atrial fibrillation. Circ. Genom. Precis. Med. 2020;13:387–395. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.119.002874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ganapathi M, et al. Bi-allelic missense disease-causing variants in RPL3L associate neonatal dilated cardiomyopathy with muscle-specific ribosome biogenesis. Hum. Genet. 2020;139:1443–1454. doi: 10.1007/s00439-020-02188-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Al-Hassnan ZN, et al. Categorized genetic analysis in childhood-onset cardiomyopathy. Circ. Genom. Precis. Med. 2020;13:504–514. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.120.002969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nannapaneni H, et al. Further evidence of autosomal recessive inheritance of RPL3L pathogenic variants with rapidly progressive neonatal dilated cardiomyopathy. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022;9:65. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9030065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mailliot J, et al. Crystal structures of the uL3 mutant ribosome: Illustration of the importance of ribosomal proteins for translation efficiency. J. Mol. Biol. 2016;428:2195–2202. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Meskauskas A, Petrov AN, Dinman JD. Identification of functionally important amino acids of ribosomal protein L3 by saturation mutagenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005;25:10863–10874. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.24.10863-10874.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Malecki JM, et al. Human METTL18 is a histidine-specific methyltransferase that targets RPL3 and affects ribosome biogenesis and function. Nucl. Acids Res. 2021;49:3185–3203. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Matsuura-Suzuki E, et al. METTL18-mediated histidine methylation on RPL3 modulates translation elongation for proteostasis maintenance. Elife. 2022;11:e72780. doi: 10.7554/eLife.72780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kapushesky M, et al. Gene expression atlas at the european bioinformatics institute. Nucl. Acids Res. 2010;38:D690–D698. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Brawand D, et al. The evolution of gene expression levels in mammalian organs. Nature. 2011;478:343–348. doi: 10.1038/nature10532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Koenig AL, et al. Single-cell transcriptomics reveals cell-type-specific diversification in human heart failure. Nat. Cardiovasc. Res. 2022;1:263–280. doi: 10.1038/s44161-022-00028-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Schaum N, et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of 20 mouse organs creates a Tabula Muris. Nature. 2018;562:367–372. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0590-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yokoyama T, et al. HCV IRES captures an actively translating 80S ribosome. Mol. Cell. 2019;74:1205–1214. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jumper J, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021;596:583–589. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Varadi M, et al. AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucl. Acids Res. 2022;50:D439–D444. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.O’Leary MN, et al. The ribosomal protein Rpl22 controls ribosome composition by directly repressing expression of its own paralog, Rpl22l1. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nita A, et al. A ubiquitin-like protein encoded by the “noncoding” RNA TINCR promotes keratinocyte proliferation and wound healing. PLoS Genet. 2021;17:e1009686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ingolia NT, Ghaemmaghami S, Newman JRS, Weissman JS. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science. 2009;324:218–223. doi: 10.1126/science.1168978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ji Z. RibORF: Identifying genome-wide translated open reading frames using ribosome profiling. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2018;124:e67. doi: 10.1002/cpmb.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.O’Connor PBF, Andreev DE, Baranov PV. Comparative survey of the relative impact of mRNA features on local ribosome profiling read density. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:12915. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Stein KC, Frydman J. The stop-and-go traffic regulating protein biogenesis: How translation kinetics controls proteostasis. J. Biol. Chem. 2019;294:2076–2084. doi: 10.1074/jbc.REV118.002814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Collart MA, Weiss B. Ribosome pausing, a dangerous necessity for co-translational events. Nucl. Acids Res. 2020;48:1043–1055. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Das Sharma S, et al. Widespread alterations in translation elongation in the brain of juvenile Fmr1 knockout mice. Cell Rep. 2019;26:3313–3322. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.02.086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Evans ME, Clark WC, Zheng GQ, Pan T. Determination of tRNA aminoacylation levels by high-throughput sequencing. Nucl. Acids Res. 2017;45:e133. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mao Y, et al. m(6)A in mRNA coding regions promotes translation via the RNA helicase-containing YTHDC2. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:5332. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13317-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ikeuchi K, Izawa T, Inada T. Recent progress on the molecular mechanism of quality controls induced by ribosome stalling. Front. Genet. 2019;9:743. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Joazeiro CAP. Mechanisms and functions of ribosome-associated protein quality control. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019;20:368–383. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0118-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Han PX, et al. Genome-wide survey of ribosome collision. Cell Rep. 2020;31:107610. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Meydan S, Guydosh NR. Disome and trisome profiling reveal genome-wide targets of ribosome quality control. Mol. Cell. 2020;79:588–602. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Dellefave L, McNally EM. The genetics of dilated cardiomyopathy. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2010;25:198–204. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e328337ba52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Previs MJ, et al. Myosin-binding protein C corrects an intrinsic inhomogeneity in cardiac excitation-contraction coupling. Sci. Adv. 2015;1:e1400205. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1400205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zou PJ, et al. Palindromic assembly of the giant muscle protein titin in the sarcomeric Z-disk. Nature. 2006;439:229–233. doi: 10.1038/nature04343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Chauhan PK, Sowdhamini R. LIM domain-wide comprehensive virtual mutagenesis provides structural rationale for cardiomyopathy mutations in CSRP3. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:3562. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07553-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Rossi D, et al. Calsequestrin, a key protein in striated muscle health and disease. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 2021;42:267–279. doi: 10.1007/s10974-020-09583-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Von Nandelstadh P, et al. A class III PDZ binding motif in the myotilin and FATZ families binds enigma family proteins: a common link for Z-disc myopathies. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009;29:822–834. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01454-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Stein KC, Morales-Polanco F, van der Lienden J, Rainbolt TK, Frydman J. Ageing exacerbates ribosome pausing to disrupt cotranslational proteostasis. Nature. 2022;601:637–642. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04295-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Eshraghi M, et al. Mutant Huntingtin stalls ribosomes and represses protein synthesis in a cellular model of Huntington disease. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:1461. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21637-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Li H, et al. A male germ-cell-specific ribosome controls male fertility. Nature. 2022;612:725–731. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05508-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Webb KJ, et al. A novel 3-methylhistidine modification of yeast ribosomal protein Rpl3 is dependent upon the YIL110W methyltransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:37598–37606. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.170787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Al-Hadid Q, Roy K, Chanfreau G, Clarke SG. Methylation of yeast ribosomal protein Rpl3 promotes translational elongation fidelity. RNA. 2016;22:489–498. doi: 10.1261/rna.054569.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Grimes KM, et al. Rpl3l gene deletion in mice reduces heart weight over time. Front. Physiol. 2023;14:1054169. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1054169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Okabe K, et al. DPP (dipeptidyl peptidase)-4 inhibitor attenuates Ang II (angiotensin ii)-induced cardiac hypertrophy via GLP (glucagon-like peptide)-1-dependent suppression of Nox (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase) 4-HDAC (histone deacetylase) 4 pathway. Hypertension. 2020;75:991–1001. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Goddard TD, et al. UCSF ChimeraX: Meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 2018;27:14–25. doi: 10.1002/pro.3235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Demichev V, Messner CB, Vernardis SI, Lilley KS, Ralser M. DIA-NN: neural networks and interference correction enable deep proteome coverage in high throughput. Nat. Methods. 2020;17:41–44. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0638-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Wu CCC, Zinshteyn B, Wehner KA, Green R. High-resolution ribosome profiling defines discrete ribosome elongation states and translational regulation during cellular stress. Mol. Cell. 2019;73:959–970. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.12.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Iwasaki S, Floor SN, Ingolia NT. Rocaglates convert DEAD-box protein eIF4A into a sequence-selective translational repressor. Nature. 2016;534:558–561. doi: 10.1038/nature17978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Tunney R, et al. Accurate design of translational output by a neural network model of ribosome distribution. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2018;25:577–582. doi: 10.1038/s41594-018-0080-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Zhong Y, et al. RiboDiff: detecting changes of mRNA translation efficiency from ribosome footprints. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:139–141. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All sequence data have been deposited in GEO under the accession number GSE203072. The MS data have been deposited with the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the JPOST partner repository under the data set identifiers PXD034018 and PXD034019. Structural data for human 80S ribosome (PDB ID: 6IP5 and A-tRNA (PDB ID: 4V5D were obtained from the Protein Data Bank. The predicted model of human RPL3L was obtained from the AlphaFold protein structure database (Identifier: AF-Q92910-F1). Source data are provided with this paper.
All custom Python scripts used in the analyses of this paper are available on request.