Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Gerontol. 2022 Oct 21;47(1):50–65. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2022.2137449

Table 3.

Feasibility and acceptability of the CuidaTEXT study and intervention (n=21)

Feasibility
  Study recruitment Recruitment duration 61 days
  Study enrollment Enrollment duration * 20 days
  Intervention enrollment Percentage of participants able to opt into CuidaTEXT* 100% (n=24)
  Retention rate Percentage of enrolled participants who completed the follow-up survey * 87.5% (n=21)
  Assessment feasibility Percentage of enrolled participants who completed the preliminary efficacy outcomes * 83.3% (n=20)
  Intervention delivery Percentage of participants who experienced technical issues
1) Sometimes had no internet to see videos, 2) lost text message history when phone stopped working
9.5% (n=2)
  Intervention engagement Percentage of participants who sent 0 text messages (no interaction) * 8.3% (n=2)
Percentage of participants who sent 1–9 text messages (low interaction) * 0.0% (n=0)
Percentage of participants who sent 10–49 text messages (intermediate interaction) * 37.5% (n=9)
Percentage of participants who sent 50–99 text messages (high interaction) * 29.2% (n=7)
Percentage of participants who sent more than 100 text messages (very high interaction) * 25.0% (n=6)
Mean percentage text messages that were keywords 44.1% (SD=30.6)
Percentage of participants who unsubscribed from CuidaTEXT * 0% (n=0)
Percentage of participants who reported reading most messages thoroughly 85.7% (18)
Acceptability
  Satisfaction Very or extremely satisfied with intervention a 100.0% (21)
Very or extremely satisfied with number of texts per day a 90.4% (19)
Very or extremely satisfied with keyword functionality a 100.0% (19)
Very or extremely satisfied with links to videos a 93.8% (15)
Very or extremely satisfied with numbers to resources a 75.0% (12)
Very or extremely satisfied with links to resources a 95.0% (19)
Very or extremely satisfied with length of the intervention a 85.0% (17)
Very or extremely satisfied with booklet a 100.0% (13)
Very or extremely satisfied with family participation a ** 100.0% (4)
  Helpfulness Helped a lot in caring for their care recipient b 71.4% (15)
Helped a lot in caring for themselves b 66.7% (14)
Helped a lot in understanding more about the disease b 85.7% (18)
  Usability System Usability Scale score (0–100) 95.8 (SD=9.7)
*

Metrics calculated for all participants (n=24)

**

Only four participants responded to this question, as all other participants enrolled alone with no other relative

a

Very and extremely satisfied have been collapsed vs not at all and somewhat satisfied

b

Helped a lot vs not at all, a little and somehow.