Table 3.
Feasibility | ||
Study recruitment | Recruitment duration | 61 days |
Study enrollment | Enrollment duration * | 20 days |
Intervention enrollment | Percentage of participants able to opt into CuidaTEXT* | 100% (n=24) |
Retention rate | Percentage of enrolled participants who completed the follow-up survey * | 87.5% (n=21) |
Assessment feasibility | Percentage of enrolled participants who completed the preliminary efficacy outcomes * | 83.3% (n=20) |
Intervention delivery | Percentage of participants who experienced technical issues 1) Sometimes had no internet to see videos, 2) lost text message history when phone stopped working |
9.5% (n=2) |
Intervention engagement | Percentage of participants who sent 0 text messages (no interaction) * | 8.3% (n=2) |
Percentage of participants who sent 1–9 text messages (low interaction) * | 0.0% (n=0) | |
Percentage of participants who sent 10–49 text messages (intermediate interaction) * | 37.5% (n=9) | |
Percentage of participants who sent 50–99 text messages (high interaction) * | 29.2% (n=7) | |
Percentage of participants who sent more than 100 text messages (very high interaction) * | 25.0% (n=6) | |
Mean percentage text messages that were keywords | 44.1% (SD=30.6) | |
Percentage of participants who unsubscribed from CuidaTEXT * | 0% (n=0) | |
Percentage of participants who reported reading most messages thoroughly | 85.7% (18) | |
Acceptability | ||
Satisfaction | Very or extremely satisfied with intervention a | 100.0% (21) |
Very or extremely satisfied with number of texts per day a | 90.4% (19) | |
Very or extremely satisfied with keyword functionality a | 100.0% (19) | |
Very or extremely satisfied with links to videos a | 93.8% (15) | |
Very or extremely satisfied with numbers to resources a | 75.0% (12) | |
Very or extremely satisfied with links to resources a | 95.0% (19) | |
Very or extremely satisfied with length of the intervention a | 85.0% (17) | |
Very or extremely satisfied with booklet a | 100.0% (13) | |
Very or extremely satisfied with family participation a ** | 100.0% (4) | |
Helpfulness | Helped a lot in caring for their care recipient b | 71.4% (15) |
Helped a lot in caring for themselves b | 66.7% (14) | |
Helped a lot in understanding more about the disease b | 85.7% (18) | |
Usability | System Usability Scale score (0–100) | 95.8 (SD=9.7) |
Metrics calculated for all participants (n=24)
Only four participants responded to this question, as all other participants enrolled alone with no other relative
Very and extremely satisfied have been collapsed vs not at all and somewhat satisfied
Helped a lot vs not at all, a little and somehow.