Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 7;11:1150764. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1150764

TABLE 2.

Guidelines for co-culture design and features to include when reporting; a check-list. A summary of the three key aspects identified for co-culture model construction and a fourth key aspect describing model evaluation for validation. Each key aspect is itemized with pertinent considerations for co-culture model design as well as a designation on features that need reported to contextualize co-culture findings.

Key aspects Considerations Report
i) Cell Types and interactions Cancer cell Species and tissue background
Confirm cell-specific characteristics
Confirm cell culture purity (no contamination)
Stromal cell type(s) Species (if different, xeno-co-culture), tissue background and cell type
Confirm cell-specific characteristics
Confirm cell culture purity (no contamination)
Juxtacrine/Paracrine Interactions Direct or indirect co-culture
How to identify cell types later, if required? Any cell modifications performed, markers used
ii) Physical arrangement and ECM context for each cell type Dimensionality Whether 2D, 3D or a combination
Physical cell context; Mechanotransduction Description of co-culture architecture. Culture plastic, membrane, spheroid/tumor organoid, Scaffold (free) details
ECM biochemical context Description of chemical background of the co-culture; Inert or active?
iii) Media Does the media support the cells? Effect of co-culture media selection on mono-cultured cell types included
Does the media influence relevant signaling? Appropriate control conditions; consider different media for comparison—is effect dependent on particular medium?
Media exchange (Microfluidics) Static or dynamic media regimen; description
Physical characteristics (Such as pressure, flow rate)
Body-on-a-chip; serial chambers and order, potential conditioned media effects of preceding chamber
iv) Validation How well does the model perform? How do adapted models compare to existing in vitro models?
For models with no existing in vitro comparison; assess by comparison to in vivo situation
Predictive capacity and translation Do model results make predictions that can be assessed in vivo? How do these compare?