Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 22;14(5):675–685. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13997

Table 3.

Odds ratios of diabetic retinopathy by different status of DHEA

No. of participants No. of cases Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value
Quartile 1 380 113 Reference Reference Reference
Quartile 2 380 83 0.66 (0.48, 0.92) 0.013 0.68 (0.49, 0.95) 0.022 0.56 (0.37, 0.85) 0.006
Quartile 3 379 88 0.72 (0.52, 0.99) 0.042 0.74 (0.52, 1.03) 0.076 0.70 (0.46, 1.07) 0.102
Quartile 4 380 62 0.46 (0.33, 0.65) <0.001 0.47 (0.32, 0.69) <0.001 0.51 (0.32, 0.81) 0.005
P for trend <0.001 0.001 0.012
As a continuous variable 1,519 346 0.66 (0.54, 0.81) <0.001 0.67 (0.53, 0.83) <0.001 0.71 (0.54, 0.94) 0.015

DHEA was log‐transformed with base natural constant.

Model 1: unadjusted. Model 2: adjusts for age and insurance type. Model 3: model 2 + BMI, duration of diabetes mellitus, SBP, DBP, DKD, HDL‐C, FBG, HbA1c, and use of metformin, α‐glucosidase inhibitors, and insulin.

BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DHEA, dehydroepiandrosterone; DKD, diabetic kidney disease; DR, diabetic retinopathy; FBG, fasting blood glucose; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; HDL‐C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; OR, odds ratio; SBP, systolic blood pressure.