Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 21;23:74. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02166-8

Table 3.

The AUC comparison of XGB model and nomogram (based on multivariable logistic regression analysis) in different sets

ML models AUC S. E 95% CI Z statistic p
Train set
 XGB 0.907 0.00528 0.896—0.918 77.248  < 0.0001
 nomogram 0.802 0.0232 0.782—0.822 13.029  < 0.0001
Test set
 XGB 0.827 0.0299 0.796—0.855 10.910  < 0.0001
 nomogram 0.838 0.0346 0.808—0.865 9.764  < 0.0001
External validation set
 XGB 0.754 0.0517 0.663—0.831 4.915  < 0.0001
 nomogram 0.706 0.0579 0.611—0.789 3.556 0.0004