Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 8;27:181–199. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.03.024

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Hierarchical characterization and composition analysis of BLBs mineralized at various times. (A) The SEM images and elemental mapping of EDS throughout the cross-section of BLBs. (B) (a) The micro-CT image of cross-section of BLBs. (b) Schematic diagram illustrating selected region of construct measuring HU value. Region 1 indicated the surface one-third region of construct. Region 2 indicated the internal third region of construct. (c) HU value of different region of construct. The statistically significant difference p was set as 0.05. a indicated a statistically significant difference between region 1 and 2 in the same construct. b indicated that there was a statistically significant difference in the same region compared with BCM. c indicated that there was a statistically significant difference in the same region compared with BLB6d. d indicated that there was a statistically significant difference in the same region compared with BLB9d.