Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 20;2015(2):CD004985. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004985.pub5

Rotter 1988.

Methods Cluster RCT.
 Power calculation: no.
 Follow‐up period: 3 weeks after discharge.
Participants 2953 patients undergoing elective clean surgery.
 Exclusion: patients with a temperature of 37.5oC on the day of or day before surgery, infection remote from operation site, antibiotics given within 7 days prior to surgery for infection, incarcerated inguinal hernia, radical mastectomy.
 Baseline comparability: age, sex, type of surgery, antibiotic prophylaxis, hair washed, hair removal method, wound drainage.
Interventions All patients had 2 showers;1 the day before surgery and 1 on the day of surgery.
 Group 1: used 50 ml of chlorhexidine 4% for each shower;
 Group 2: placebo.
 Special application instructions were provided to all participants.
Outcomes Primary outcome:
 Wound infection was defined in the report as "inflammation of the surgical wound with discharge of pus, spontaneous and/or after surgical intervention that occurs during hospitalisation or during routine follow‐up"
 Group 1: 37/1413 (2.6%);
 Group 2: 33/1400 (2.4%).
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation was carried out for each surgical unit by means of computer‐generated patient trial numbers.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Bottles of solution were contained in boxes of 10, each holding 5 chlorhexidine and 5 placebo in random sequence. Unless the code was broken, it was impossible to know which preparation the patient had used.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Investigator and participant Low risk Neither patients nor investigators were aware of group allocation.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Outcome assessor Low risk Outcome assessment was by routine surveillance methods employed by individual hospitals (infection control nurse or surgeon). They were unaware of group allocation.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 140 (4.7%) patients were withdrawn after randomisation either because the patient was not operated on (62 patients), had had 1 bath only (26), operation not stated 'clean' (14) or had a current infection (38). The withdrawals were evenly distributed between the chlorhexidine and placebo groups.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All data reported.
Other bias Low risk ICI supplied the bathing materials. However, as results favoured the placebo group, this is unlikely to have affected results.