Table 3.

Changes in confidence levels according to the reader’s previous experience

			Overall	Low experience	Intermediate experience	High experience
Local status	Confidence level	Mean confidence at standard imaging	2.48 [IQR. 2.0–3.0]	2.47 [IQR. 2.0–3.0]	2.47 [IQR. 2.0–3.0]	2.51 [IQR. 2.0–3.0]
		Mean confidence at standard + forced diuresis	2.72 [IQR. 3.0–3.0]	2.82 [IQR. 3.0–3.0]	2.68 [IQR. 3.0–3.0]	2.66 [IQR. 3.0–3.0]
		Number of positive differences	140	59	42	39
		Number of negative differences	25	6	11	8
		p value	< 0.0001	< 0.0001	< 0.0001	0.0006
	PSMA RADS	Mean confidence at standard imaging	2.23 [IQR. 2.0–3.0]	2.08 [IQR. 2.0–3.0]	2.32 [IQR. 2.0–3.0]	2.28 [IQR. 2.0–3.0]
		Mean confidence at standard + forced diuresis	2.32 [IQR. 2.0–3.0]	2.55 [IQR. 2.0–3.0]	2.25 [IQR. 2.0–3.0]	2.23 [IQR. 2.0–3.0]
		Number of positive differences	34	17	8	9
		Number of negative differences	15	1	8	6
		p value	0.0561	0.0002	0.8603	0.8904
Nodal status	Confidence level	Mean confidence at standard imaging	2.56 [IQR. 2.0–3.0]	2.58 [IQR. 2.0–3.0]	2.52 [IQR. 2.0–3.0]	2.58 [IQR. 2.0–3.0]
		Mean confidence at standard + forced diuresis	2.78 [IQR. 3.0–3.0]	2.83 [IQR. 3.0–3.0]	2.75 [IQR. 3.0–3.0]	2.77 [IQR. 3.0–3.0]
		Number of positive differences	123	43	44	36
		Number of negative differences	18	6	7	5
		p value	< 0.0001	< 0.0001	< 0.0001	< 0.0001
	PSMA RADS	Mean confidence at standard imaging	2.11 [IQR. 1.0–3.0]	2.04 [IQR. 1.0–3.0]	2.22 [IQR. 1.0–3.0]	2.11 [IQR. 1.0–3.0]
		Mean confidence at standard + forced diuresis	2.52 [IQR. 2.0–3.0]	2.57 [IQR. 2.5–3.0]	2.61 [IQR. 3.0–3.0]	2.42 [IQR. 1.0–3.0]
		Number of positive differences	40	16	12	12
		Number of negative differences	6	2	3	1
		p value	< 0.0001	0.0019	0.0103	0.0081