Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 1;50:85–90. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.02.008

Table 2.

Operative data

Anaesthesia, n (%)
 GA 69 (96%)
 Spinal 3 (4)
Operator experience, n (%)
 Endourologist 60 (83)
 Consultant urologist 12 (17)
Preoperative infection, n (%) 15 (21)
URS approach, n (%)
 Retrograde 62 (86)
 Antegrade 8 (11)
 Simultaneous retrograde/antegrade URS 2 (3)
Side, n (%)
 Right/left 43 (60)/29 (40)
Bilateral URS, n (%) 15 (21)
Access sheath use during retrograde URS, n (%) 12 (17)
Successful cannulation of ureteric orifice, n (%)
 Yes 52 (82)
 No—not identified 7 (11)
 No—anastomotic stricture 4 (6)
 No—tumour at orifice 1 (1)
Successful access to renal unit, n (%)
 Overall 62 (86)
 Retrograde: 52 (82)
 Antegradea 8 (100)
 Simultaneous retrograde/antegradea URS 2 (100)
Overall success of intervention in single session, n (%) 59 (82)
Postoperative drainage, n (%)
 JJ stent 32 (44)
 Nephrostomy 20 (28)
 Nothing 20 (28)
Operative time (min), mean (range) 49 (11–126)
Hospital stay (d), mean (range) 1 (0–10)

GA = general anaesthesia; URS = ureteroscopy.

a

Success at accessing the level of pathology.